1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. 3:15-cv-00154-JD
 
A
PPLE
S
EPLY
B
RIEF
ISO
 
S
UMMARY
J
UDGMENT OF
I
 NVALIDITY
U
 NDER
35
 
U.S.C.
 
§
 
101
WILLIAM F. LEE (admitted
 pro hac vice
) william.lee@wilmerhale.com JOSEPH J. MUELLER (admitted
 pro hac vice
)  joseph.mueller@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (CA SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com CHRISTINE E. DUH (CA SBN 228544) christine.duh@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
APPLE INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, a Swedish Corporation, and ERICSSON, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Case No. 3:15-cv-00154-JD
APPLE’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF ASSERTED CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,445,917 AND 8,023,990
 
UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101
Hon. James Donato Hearing Date: November 18, 2015 Time: 10:00am Courtroom: 11 (19th Floor) TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, a Swedish Corporation, and ERICSSON, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., a California Corporation, Counterclaim-Defendant.
Case 3:15-cv-00154-JD Document 141 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 19
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. 3:15-cv-00154-JD i
 
A
PPLE
S
EPLY
B
RIEF
ISO
 
S
UMMARY
J
UDGMENT OF
I
 NVALIDITY
U
 NDER
35
 
U.S.C.
 
§
 
101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1
 
ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................2
 
I.
 
The ’917 Patent Claims Fail Both Steps Of The
 Alice
Test. ...............................................2
 
A.
 
 Alice Step 1:
The Essence of the Alleged ’917 Invention Is The Concept Of Event-Based Reporting.........................................................................2
 
B.
 
 Alice Step 2:
Ericsson Relies on Non-Existent and Generic Claim Limitations To Attempt to Manufacture an Inventive Concept Where  None Exists. .............................................................................................................5
 
II.
 
The ’990 Patent Claims Fail Both Steps Of The
 Alice
Test. .............................................10
 
A.
 
 Alice Step 1:
The Essence of the Alleged ’990 Invention Is The Concept Of Following Commands To An Individual While Ignoring Commands To A Group. ........................................................................................10
 
B.
 
 Alice Step 2:
Ericsson Relies on Non-Existent and Generic Claim Limitations To Attempt To Manufacture an Inventive Concept Where  None Exists ............................................................................................................12
 
CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................................14
 
Case 3:15-cv-00154-JD Document 141 Filed 11/04/15 Page 2 of 19
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. 3:15-cv-00154-JD ii
 
A
PPLE
S
EPLY
B
RIEF
ISO
 
S
UMMARY
J
UDGMENT OF
I
 NVALIDITY
U
 NDER
35
 
U.S.C.
 
§
 
101
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases
 Accenture Global Svcs., GmbH v. Guidewire Software, Inc.
, 728 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2013)..........................................................................................2, 5, 6
 Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
,  No. 6:15-v-0029, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77411 (June 12, 2015 W.D. Tex.) ...........................4
 Affinity Labs of Tex., LLC v. DirecTV, LLC 
,  No. W:15-CV-030, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92889 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2015) ........................11
 Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l
, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014) .....................................................................................................
 passim
 
Cloud Satchel, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
, 76 F. Supp. 3d 553 (D. Del. 2014) ...........................................................................................13
Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC v. Sprint Commc’ns Co.
, 55 F. Supp. 3d 544 (D. Del. 2014) .............................................................................................5
Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo
, 776 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2015)................................................................................................10
 DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P.
, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)..................................................................................................5
 Eclipse IP LLC v. McKinley Equip. Corp.,
  No. SACV 14-742-GW, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125529 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2014) ........................................................................................................10
 Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
, 56 F. Supp. 3d 1167 (C.D. Cal. 2014) .......................................................................................3
 In re TLI Commc’ns LLC Patent Litig.
, 87 F. Supp. 3d 773 (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2015) ..............................................................................2
 Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA)
, 792 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2015)..................................................................................................4
 Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Fin. Corp.
,  No. PWG-14-11, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116740 (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2015) ................................7
 Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indem. Co
.,  No. 1:14-CV-00220, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129153 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 25, 2015) ..........................................................................................................6
Case 3:15-cv-00154-JD Document 141 Filed 11/04/15 Page 3 of 19
View on Scribd