1
against
us
the Federal Government will have
to
rationally explain before a
jury
of
my
peers why 2 the Federal Government refused
to
allow
the
states
of
the
Northwest Territories
to
come in
on
3 the equal footing doctrine,
of
the
original
3
states.
It
needs
to
be documented here
that
in
4
order
to
make a similar living on
what
is
considered a homestead, in most
of
the
arid regions in
5
the original Northwest Territories,
it
takes several thousands
of
acres instead
of
the
160 acres. 6 At the
time
we took
Hostile Adverse Possession
of
the
Malheur
it
was being closed
7
down
for
the winter.
At no
time
did I
or
anyone else interfere
with
any public employees 8 working on the
Malheur
in fact we encouraged them
to
come
to
work
as
we
wanted
to
discuss 9 the ownership problem
with
them and get
as
much information we could
from
them.
If
10
anything,
it
was
their
choice
to
not
come
to
work,
out
of
guilt. The evidence
will
show
that
11
maintenance individuals came
to
conduct routine maintenance on
the
Malheur while
we were
12
there, and we helped
them
conduct
their
maintenance duties. I never knowingly
or
13
intentionally broke any laws.
14
Furthermore
the
evidence will show
that
federal employees were determined
to
15
secretly extend
the
boundaries
ofthe
Malheur. The individuals
who
we allegedly interfered
16
with
were directly involved in subversive activities
to
secretly extend
the
boundaries
of
the
17
Malheur,
and
take taxpayers (ranchers) lives, liberties and properties. Evidence
will
show
BLM
18
employees (who
we
were supposedly interfering
with)
were caught shredding papers in
the
19
BLM
office in Bums. Evidence will show
that
Harney County's Judge Grasity's
brother
is
a
BLM
20
official
that
was involved in secretly extending
the
boundaries
of
he
Malheur, and
as
such
21
Judge Grasity was aware
of
the
effort, acted in omission, and acted
to
cover-up
for
his brother's
22
subversive activities. Evidence will show Judge Grasity was in a position
to
block access
to
the
23
Harney County Jury roll call index, (the people) and did
just
that to
cover-up his personal
24
involvement in
the
corruption.
25
Evidence
will
also show
that
Judge Ann Aiken was related
to
the
person
who
authorized
26
the
Appeal
that
lead
to
the
re-sentencing
of
the
Hammonds and
as
such she had a direct
27
conflict
of
nterest involved. Evidence will also show
that
Judge Ann Aiken's siblings were
28
directly involved in rallying up opposition
to
forcibly remove us
from the Malheur
instead
of
29
properly civilly litigating
our
Hostile Adverse Possession
of
it
un-clouding
the
land titles in
the
3
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 162 Filed 02/17/16 Page 3 of 8