March 20,
2 15
U)
Our objective was to determine
whether
DoO
policies
and
procedures
for
using
DoD
UAS
and
associated
processing, exploitation,
and
dissemination
activities
comply
with applicab
le
Jaws,
regu
lations,
and
national
policies for
providing
support
to domestic
civil
authorities. (U)
DoD
Is
fully
compliant
with
laws,
regulations,
and
nationa
l policies
for
UA
S
support
to domestic civil authorities.
• (U) Units
operating
UASs
told
us
that,
while
the
y
understand
the
American publl
c sl
egitimate
co
ncerns abo
ut civil
libenties
and
privacy
rights,
they
do
not operate
UASs
any
di
ffe
rently
from
manned
platforms
with
sim
il
ar
capabilities.
t;lr
n
U)
nda
i
·
• (FOUO) We
recomm
e
nd
that
USO
(P)
establ
ish a
standardized
formal
approva
l
proc
ess
for
UAS
support to
domesti
c
civil
authorities. • (FOUO)
We recommend
that
USO
(P)
add
r
ess
the
concerns
of
Military
Service/
Nati
ona
l Guard
Bure
au
UAS
experts
that
policy
ambiguity is potentially d
egrading
UA
S training
and operat
ional readiness. •
FOUO)
We also
recomm
e
nd
that
the
USD
(P) formally c
harter
the Dom
estic
Ima
gery
Wo
rking
Group.
U, Management Comments and Our
lt
011
(U) The Assistant
Secre
t
ary
of
Defense for Policy, Homeland Defense
Gl
oba
l Security
concurred
with
our
recommendations.
nd
no
further
comments
are
required. Please see the
Re
commendations
Table
onthe
next page.
tl~
I
Visit
u
t
www.dodlg.mil
fOR
OFflCI
AL
USB
ONLY