REDACTEDVERSIONOFDOCUMENT(S)SOUGHTTOBESEALED
Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1625-4 Filed 04/08/16 Page 1 of 10
O
RACLE
’
S
R
ESPONSE TO
G
OOGLE
’
S
M
OTION
T
O
S
TRIKE
T
ESTIMONY OF
J
AMES
R.K
EARL
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728ORRICK, HERRINGTON &SUTCLIFFE LLPKAREN G. JOHNSON-MCKEWAN (SBN 121570)kjohnson-mckewan@orrick.comANNETTE L. HURST (SBN 148738)ahurst@orrick.comGABRIEL M. RAMSEY (SBN 209218)gramsey@orrick.com405 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105Tel: 1.415.773.5700 / Fax: 1.415.773.5759PETER A. BICKS (
pro hac vice
) pbicks@orrick.comLISA T. SIMPSON (
pro hac vice
)lsimpson@orrick.com51 West 52
nd
Street, New York, NY 10019Tel: 1.212.506.5000 / Fax: 1.212.506.5151BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLPDAVID BOIES (
pro hac vice
)dboies@bsfllp.com333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504Tel: 1.914.749.8200 / Fax: 1.914.749.8300STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)sholtzman@bsfllp.com1999 Harrison St., Ste. 900, Oakland, CA 94612Tel: 1.510.874.1000 / Fax: 1.510.874.1460ORACLE CORPORATIONDORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)dorian.daley@oracle.comDEBORAH K. MILLER (SBN 95527)deborah.miller@oracle.comMATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (SBN 211600)matthew.sarboraria@oracle.comRUCHIKA AGRAWAL (SBN 246058)ruchika.agrawal@oracle.com500 Oracle Parkway,Redwood City, CA 94065Tel: 650.506.5200 / Fax: 650.506.7117
ttorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONORACLE AMERICA, INC.,Plaintiff,v.GOOGLE INC.,Defendant.Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA
ORACLE’SRESPONSETO GOOGLE’S MOTION TO STRIKETESTIMONYOF JAMES R. KEARL
Date: April27, 2016at 8:00 amDept.:Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Judge:Honorable William H. Alsup
Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1625-4 Filed 04/08/16 Page 2 of 10
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
-i-12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................2I.BOTH SIDES AGREE PROF. KEARL’S THIRD WAY SHOULD BE EXCLUDED........................................................................................................................2II.GOOGLE’S CHERRY-PICKING IS IMPROPER AND MISLEADING.........................5CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
Case 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document 1625-4 Filed 04/08/16 Page 3 of 10