As you read my translations, please be aware that I no longer have my original notes. I'm looking at the messages after 15 years, and doing the best I can.If you follow along one line at a time, especially in the first message, you should be able to easily see how the message is constructed. Following messages after the first get progressively more difficult.It would help to be familiar with counting in other bases besides base 10 (the normal counting system we are all used to). Instead of base 10 counting like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, etc, the message generally uses base 6 counting, which looks like this: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, etc. In base 6, the right-most digit represents the “ones” column, as it does in base 10. But the next-to-right-most digit represents the “sixes” column, instead of the “tens” column. So the number 325 in base 10 is (3 x 100) + (2 x 10) + (5 x 1). But 325 would be written in base 6 as 1301, which is (1 x 216) + (3 x 36) + (0 x 6) + (1 x 1). As you move left in the digits, each one represent another power of 6. So, reading from right to left, the position columns are 6^0 = 1, 6^1 = 6, 6^2 = 36, 6^3 = 216, 6^4 = 1296, and so on. In base 10, they are 10^0 = 1, 10^1 = 10, 10^2 = 100, 10^3 = 1000, 10^4 = 10000, and so on. Fractions and “decimals” are also possible in base 6. Instead of the positions after the decimal point representing a tenth, a hundredth, a thousandth, and so on, they represent negative powers of 6: one-sixth, one-thirty-sixth, and so on.Also note that in general, while the first message is more or less self-contained, to understand each subsequent message relies on the information in the previous messages. In some cases it even relies on data in the subsequent messages! The reason for that is that a symbol may be introduced in one message that doesn't have enough examples of its usage to really understand. Once you see additional messages, that symbol may have additional examples of use and may be easier to understand. On the Contact Project message board, you actually see that in the discussion a lot – where a later message makes some symbol in an earlier message clear. I think that you'll especially see that in the third message enclosed here. I provide translations, especially for the last 13 lines or so that really could not be understood with just the data provided in the message itself. In fact, they were some of the most difficult symbols in the entire sequence of messages to understand.This document only contains translations for the first three messages, if only because this is so time consuming. By checking the archived message board from 1995 on the Contact Project website, you should be able to translate the remaining messages if you so desire. If I ever feel like it, I may update this document to include further translations... but don't count on it.The following is a translation of the first message.
•
Rows 1 through 6 show a simple unary count. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unary_numeral_system
•
Rows 7 through 12 demonstrate addition – notice that the numbers being summed occur on the outside of the statement and the total occurs in the center of the statement. The message also demonstrates the symmetry, where the order of the two outside values does not matter.
•
Rows 13 through 18 demonstrate subtraction. Because the alien grammar reads from the outside to the inside (rather than left-to-right or right-to-left), I had to assign specific positions to the minuend and subtrahend. But this seemed to go against the powerful symmetry I wanted to be a part of the grammar. So instead I chose to use two different subtraction operators – one in which the larger number is the minuend, and one in which the smaller number is the