INVESTIGATION OF THE
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
U.S. D
EPARTMENT OF
J
USTICE
C
IVIL
R
IGHTS
D
IVISION
August 10, 2016
TABLE OF CONTEN
TS
Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………3
I. Background...............................................................................................................................................................12
A.
Baltimore, Maryl
and............
.................
.....................
....................
..................
....................
.................
...............
12
B.
The
Baltimore
Police
Department
................
....................
..................
....................
..................
....................
...
15
C.
BPD’s
Enforcement
Priorities
and
Relationship
with
the
Baltimore
Community.............
.................
.....
16
D.
Federal
Involvemen
t.............................
.....................
....................
..................
....................
.................
..............
19
II.
BPD Engag
es in a
Pattern or
Practice of
Conduct
that Viol
ates the Un
ited State
s Constitu
tion and
Laws,
and
Conduct
that
Raises
Serious
Concerns ....
.................
.....................
.................
.....................
....................
..............21
A.
BPD Makes
Unconstitution
al Stops, Searche
s, and Arrests
................
....................
.................
...................24
1.
BPD’s U
nconstitution
al Sto
ps, Searches,
and
Arrests
Result
in Part
from I
ts “Zer
o To
lerance”
Enforcement
Strategy
...............
....................
..................
....................
..................
....................
....................
..........
24
2.
BPD
Unconstitutio
nally
Stops
and
Searches
Pedestrians.........................
.....................
.................
.........
27
3.
BPD
Makes
Unconstituti
onal
Arrests..........................
.....................
....................
..................
....................34
4.
BPD’s
Unconstitutio
nal S
tops, Se
arches, an
d A
rrests Re
sult from
a Lo
ngstanding
Practice
of
Overly Aggressive Street Enforcement with Deficient Oversight
and Policy Guidance.........................
....
40
B.
BPD
Discriminates
Against
African
Americans
in i
ts E
nforcement
Activities.......................
.................47
1.
BPD’s
Enforcement
Activiti
es
Disproportion
ately
Impact
African
Americans..........................
........
48
2.
Racial
Disparities
in
BPD’s
Enforcement,
Along
with
Evidence
Suggesting
Intentional
Discrimination Ag
ainst Afric
an Americans, Exac
erbates
Community Dist
rust
.................
.....................
.....
62
C.
BPD
Uses
Unreasonable
Force
..................
....................
..................
....................
.................
.....................
......
74
1.
BPD’s
Overly
Aggressive
Tactics
Unnecessarily
Escalate
Encounters
and
Result i
n E
xcessive
Force
.................
....................
..................
....................
..................
....................
....................
..................
...................76
2.
BPD Uses
Unreasonable
Force Ag
ainst Indi
viduals
with
a Mental
Health Di
sability a
nd Tho
se in
Crisis and Fails to
Make Reasonable Modificatio
ns When Interacting with Individuals with Mental
Health
Disabilities.........
..................
....................
.....................
.................
....................
..................
....................
.....
80
3.
BPD Use
s Unreas
onable
Force
Against
Juveniles
And
Ignores
Widely
Accepted
Strategies
For
Police
Interactions
With
Youth.....................
.....................
.................
....................
.....................
.................
........
85
–
1
–
4.
BPD
Uses
Unreasonable
Force
Against
People
Who
Are
Not
a
Threat
to
Officers
or
the
Public
.
88
5.
BPD’s De
ficient
Policies,
Training,
Crisis
Intervention
Program,
and La
ck of
Oversight
Underlie
The Pattern O
r Practice Of
Excessive Fo
rce and Viola
tions of th
e Americans W
ith Disabili
ties Act.....
98
6.
BPD’s
Transport
Practices
Create
a
Significant
Risk
of
Harm
.................
....................
..................
......112
D.
BPD
Unlawfully
Restricts
Protected
Speech...............................
.....................
....................
.................
.......116
1.
BPD
Unlawfully
Detains
and
Arrests
Members
of
the
Public
for
Protected
Speech
.................
......116
2.
BPD
Retaliates
by U
sing
Force
Against
Individuals
Who
Engage
in Prot
ected
Speech..................118
3.
Concerns
that
BPD
Interferes
with
the
Right
to
Record
Public
Police
Activity
...............
................119
E.
BPD’s H
andling
of Sex
ual Assaul
t Inve
stigations
Raises Serio
us Conce
rns of
Gender-Biased
Policing........
.................
.....................
.................
....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.................
..........122
1.
Evidence
of
Gender
Bias
in
BPD’s
Response
to
Sexual
Assault............
.................
....................
.........122
2.
BPD
Fails
to
Adequately
Investigate
Reports
of
Sexual
Assault...................................
.................
......123
III.
Systemic Deficienci
es in BPD’s Practi
ces Contribute to C
onstitutional V
iolations, E
rode Community
Trust, and Inh
ibit Effe
ctive Policing
...............
.....................
.................
.....................
.................
....................
............128
A.
BPD Fails to
Adequately Su
pervise Its Of
ficers’ Enforce
ment Activi
ties .
.................
.....................
.......129
1.
BPD Doe
s Not
Provide A
dequate Po
licy Guidan
ce and
Training
to its
Officers
................
............129
2.
BPD
Does
Not
Adeq
uate
ly
Super
vise
Offi
cers
or
Coll
ect
and
Anal
yze
Data
on
thei
r
Acti
viti
es
..134
B.
BPD
Fails
to
Adequately
Support
its
Officers
.................
.....................
.................
.....................
.................137
C.
BPD Fai
ls to
Hold
Officers
Accountable
for M
isconduct........
.................
.....................
.................
..........139
1.
BPD
Lacks A
dequate
Systems
to
Investigate
Complaints
and Imp
ose Di
scipline
................
...........140
2.
BPD’s
Internal
Culture
is
Resistant
to
Effectiv
e
Discipline................
....................
..................
............149
D.
BPD Do
es Not
Coordinate
with O
ther A
gencies
Appropriatel
y
.................
.....................
.................
......154
E.
BPD Fails
to Engag
e in
Effective
Community
Policing......
.................
.....................
.................
................156
1.
The
Relationship
Between
the
Police
and
the
Community
in
Baltimore
Is
Broken
................
.........157
2.
BPD
Has
Failed
to
Implement
Community
Policing
Principles
.................
.....................
.................
...
158
3.
BPD Reco
gnizes
that It
Must Imp
rove Its
Relationship
with
the Com
munities
It Serves,
But M
uch
Work Remain
s
................
....................
..................
....................
.................
.....................
....................
..................
..
159
Conclusion
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
163
–
2
–
View on Scribd
Back to document
Westminster and state officials cut the ribbon on downtown sidewalk retrofit project
Growth Opportunity Project
Carroll for Ehrlich Early Voting Rally with Bob Ehrlich Saturday October 23rd at 1pm
Fundraiser scheduled for fallen Baltimore Co. police officer Jason Schneider this Sunday
General Assembly of Maryland Dates of Interest 2011 Session
Sandy's projected path
Number 2 Most read stories in 2010 on explorecarroll
Fire in the 200 block of E. Main St. in Westminster on Sunday evening September 13, 2015
Explore Carroll
Unofficial Polling Place turnout for Carroll County on September 14, 2010
December 1, 2010 Commissioner Minnich statement about the employee terminations
20101201 Zimmer Press Release
November 2, 2010 Maryland General Election Ballot Questions Gubernatorial Election
Junction to merge with Youth Services Bureau to meet a community need
Carroll County Maryland government
Junction will be closing its doors on June 17, 2011
Tax Foundation
The sample ballot for the November 6, 2012 presidential election in Carroll County Maryland
Capitolbeat the Association of Capitol Reporters and Editors, annual conference
An article about Phil Grout’s critically acclaimed show appeared in the Carroll Eagle on November 7, 2010
MD St. Fire Marshal
The Supreme Court transcript of the Oct. 6, 2010 oral arguments Snyder v. Phelps
2005 Maryland Elected Officials Guide booklet from Constellation Energy
The Carroll County Maryland Christmas Tree
Carroll's 59th Board of County Commissioners sworn into office
FY 2001 Compensation Survey of Maryland Local Governments
General election certain to bring change for Carroll County MD
GAO Report on FED Actions Bailing Out Banks Including Foreign Banks
Phil Grout art exhibition ends at Birdie's Cafe Gallery in Westminster Maryland
2002 Carroll County Maryland Facts Book
LSKS Letter Re
Glenn Beck attorney letter
Lebron-Encarnacion Complaint
Brockton Drones
Judge Decision re
Rupee Marya v Warner Chappell Music Inc judgment
Happy Birthday fee order
2016-08-17 CEG to Office of Senate Securit - Clinton Investigation File
Ziff Davis Gawker asset purchase agreement
Univision's Gawker asset sale agreement
Kim Dotcom Opinion 08-12-16
St. Paul’s School Partial Objection to Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonyms
Brendan Dassey Order 8/12/2016
08-05-16 Hogan Motion for Sanctions With Exhibits OCR
08-09-16 AJ Daulerio Affidavit With Exhibits OCR
Bagwell v. WWE complaint
Fields Creach v. Twitter Order
APIC Right to Rise Complaint 8-10-16
GlennBeck Court Order
21 Windstream et al Motion to Dismiss
18 Bell South Appellate Brief
17 Hamilton County Appellate Brief
Smith and Woods v Clinton Complaint
Andrea Constand reply to Bill Cosby motion to intervene