LAMAR
ALEXANDER TENNESSEE
CHAIRMAN
MICHAEL
B.
ENZ
I
WYOM
I
NG
RICHARD BURR NORTH
CAROLINA JOHNNY
ISAKSON GEORGIA
RAND
PAUL KENTUCKY
SUSAN
M.
CO
LLINS
MAINE
LISA
MURKOWSKI ALASKA MARK
KIRK ILLINOIS
TIM
SCOTT
SOUTH
CAROLINA ORRIN HATCH UTAH PAT ROBERTS
KANSAS
BILL CASSIDY M.D. LOUI
SIANA
P
ATTY MUR
RAY
WASHINGTON BARBARA
A. MIKULSKI
MARYLAND
BERNARD
SAN
D
ERS
I
,
VERMONT
ROBERT P. CASEY JR.
PENNSYLVANIA AL
FRANKEN MI
NNESOTA MICHAEL
F.
BENNET COLORADO SHELDON WHITEHOUSE RHODE I
SLAND
TAMMY
BAL
DW
IN WISCONSIN CHRISTOPHER
S.
MUR
PH
Y
CONNECTICUT ELIZABETH WARREN
MASSACHUSETTS
DAVID
P.
CLEARY STAFF DIRECTOR EVAN SCHATZ DEMOCRATIC STAFF DIRECTOR
http
://help.senate.gov
The Honorable Lamar Alexander Chairman Senate HELP Committee 428 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Chairman Alexander:
tinitr
~t trs
~rn tr
CO
MMI
TTEE
ON HEAL
TH
EDUCATION LABOR AND PENSIONS
WAS
HINGTON
DC
20510-6300
January 23, 2017 We were extremely disappointed at what happened at the hearing last week for Elisabeth Betsy De Vos, President Trump's nominee to be Secretary
of
Education. We believe it is our
job
as Senators to question nominees, fully explore their records, and understand, on behalf
of
our constituents, the positions they will take at the agencies. Last week, however, instead
of
anything approaching an appropriate and reasonable level
of
robust scrutiny, Democrats were cut
off
from asking additional questions beyond a single round, which is unprecedented in the Committee. Education is too important an issue, and the Secretary
of
Education is too important a position for the country and for this Committee, to
jam
a nominee through without sufficient questioning and scrutiny. This is not about politics, it should not be about partisanship--it should be about doing the work we were elected
by
our states to do to ask questions
of
nominees on behalf
of
the people we represent.
ow
that we have received all
of
the paperwork from the Office
of
Government Ethics (OGE), we request Ms. De Vos appear for a second day
of
hearings before the HELP Committee prior to the Committee scheduling a mark-up on Ms. De Vos' nomination. We would like to ask Ms. De Vos additional questions we were prevented from asking this week given we did not know all
of
the financial and ethical information that has now been shared with us, as well as address additional questions that have arisen from the OGE paperwork. In particular, we believe it is important to ask her questions around companies she will continue to own that are directly impacted by the Department
of
Education and this administration's education agenda. We believe the opportunity to ask such questions is consistent with the responsibilities and practices
of
this committee. We appreciate your consideration
of
this request and look forward to the opportunity to more fully understand Ms. De Vos' views and positions.