MILO
&
GABBY LLC
v.
AMAZON
.
COM
,
INC
. 2
P
HILIP
P.
M
ANN
, Mann Law Group, Seattle, WA, ar-gued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by J
OHN
W
HITAKER
, Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA. J
OHN
H
UGHES
, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Denver, CO, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by J
OSEPH
D
OMAN
,
K
ATHERINE
H
ACKER
;
G
REGORY
G.
G
ARRE
,
J
ONATHAN
Y.
E
LLIS
, Latham & Wat-kins LLP, Washington, DC. M
ARK
P.
W
INE
, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Irvine, CA, for amicus curiae eBay, Inc. Also represented by M
ATTHEW
H
ERMAN
P
OPPE
, Menlo Park, CA.
______________________
Before O’M
ALLEY
,
W
ALLACH
,
and T
ARANTO
,
Circuit Judges.
O’M
ALLEY
, Circuit Judge.
Milo & Gabby LLC and Karen Keller (collectively, “Milo & Gabby”) appeal from decisions of the Western District of Washington finding that Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), through its provision of an online market-place for third parties and its “Fulfillment by Amazon” services, does not infringe the patents, copyrights, and trademark of Milo & Gabby. Because the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on Milo & Gabby’s copyright and trademark allegations, and be-cause Milo & Gabby failed to preserve its patent in-fringement arguments, we
affirm
. I.
B
ACKGROUND
A. The Parties’ Relevant Products and Services Milo & Gabby designs and sells a line of “Cozy Com-panion” pillowcases. The Cozy Companion pillowcase line includes animal-shaped pillowcases for children that turn a child’s pillowcase into a stuffed animal. Milo & Gabby