PRESS CONTACT:
Maria Simon, (703) 652-4365, MSimon@thegellerlawgroup.com Rebecca Geller, (703) 679-7067, RGeller@thegellerlawgroup.com Mackenzie Long, (916) 524-3197, mlong@wearerally.com
Woman Fired for Giving President Trump the “Middle Finger” Files Lawsuit Against Employer
Government Contractor firing employee out of fear of Trump retaliation violates Virginia employment law
April 4, 2018
(Fairfax, Virginia) – Juli Briskman filed suit in Virginia court today alleging that when Akima LLC forced her to resign, it violated Virginia employment law. Ms. Briskman lost her job in November 2017 after an image of her giving the President’s motorcade the “middle finger” went viral. Akima, a government contractor in Herndon, VA, did not want to be associated with opposition to the President. A resident of Sterling, VA, Ms. Briskman is the 50 year-old single mom of two teenage children. In October 2017, she was out for her weekend bike ride. President Trump’s motorcade drove past Ms. Briskman as she was riding. Ms. Briskman responded by raising the middle finger of her left hand to show her opposition to the President. Journalists accompanying the President photographed her message to the President and shared the images online. They went viral. Stephen Colbert, host of
The Late Show
, said “No one has summed up the mood of the country better
…
Long may she wave.” Ms. Briskman disclosed the incident to her bosses at Akima after the image went viral. They forced her to resign, claiming that Ms. Briskman’s posting of a photograph of the incident on her Facebook page—which nowhere mentioned her association with Akima—violated Akima’s social media policy. But earlier in 2017, a Senior Director of Operations at Akima injected “You’re a fucking Libtard asshole” into a Facebook discussion about Black Lives Matter. And even though the Senior Director’s Facebook profile identified himself as an Akima employee, he was allowed to delete the offensive comment and keep his job. Ms. Briskman’s suit states that it violates Virginia employment law for a government contractor to fire an employee out of fear of unlawful government retaliation. Ms. Briskman’s suit uses the contrast between her treatment and the Senior Director’s treatment to establish that she was forced to resign because of concerns about upsetting the federal government--not the supposed obscenity of the middle finger. It then underscores the suit’s critical importance by explaining why permitting business to fire