2 with process through its registered agent for service of process C T Corporation System (C0168406).
Jurisdiction and Venue
3.
This is a complaint for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,
et seq
. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. 4.
The court has personal jurisdiction over Apple, and venue under 28 U.S.C. §§1391(a)(1) and 1400(b) is proper in this district, because Apple has two regular and established places of business in this district and because Apple offers for sale and sells infringing Apple Watches in this district at those locations.
The Patents-in-Suit
5.
On May 16, 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,651,533 (“the ‘533 patent”) (Exhibit A) to Dr. Mohammed N. Islam. 6.
On September 12, 2017, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,757,040 (“the ‘040 patent”) (Exhibit B) to Dr. Mohammed N. Islam. 7.
On January 9, 2018, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,861,286 (“the ‘286 patent”) (Exhibit C) to Dr. Mohammed N. Islam. 8.
On February 6, 2018, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,885,698 (“the ‘698 patent”) (Exhibit D) to Dr. Mohammed N. Islam. 9.
The ‘533 patent, the ‘040 patent, the ‘286 patent, and the ‘698 patent are, collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit.” 10.
Omni MedSci has been, and remains, the owner by assignment of the Patents-in-Suit.
Case 2:18-cv-00134-RWS Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 2