2
COMPLAINT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiffs Osho International Foundation and Michael Hilow hereby allege as follows:
Jurisdiction & Venue
1.
This action arises under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101,
et seq.
2.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and (b), & 1367(a). 3.
Venue in this judicial district is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (c) and § 1400(a).
The Parties
4.
Plaintiff Osho International Foundation is a Swiss corporation. 5.
Plaintiff Michael Hilow is an individual residing in Los Angeles, California. 6.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereupon allege, that Defendant Chapman Way is an individual residing in Los Angeles, California. 7.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereupon allege, that Defendant Maclain Way is an individual residing in Thousand Oaks, California. 8.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereupon allege, that Defendant Duplass Brothers Productions is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business located at 199 E. Oakridge Park, Metairie, LA 70005, and is doing business in and with California. 9.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant Netflix, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located at 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032. 10.
Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have infringed Plaintiffs’ copyrights, have contributed to the infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights, or have engaged in one or more of the wrongful practices alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual or otherwise, of Defendants 1 through 10, inclusive, are presently unknown to Plaintiff, which
Case 2:19-cv-00753 Document 1 Filed 01/31/19 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:2