123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627281
3697-9
DANIEL MASTERSON’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
that on September 4, 2020, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as this matter may be heard, in Department 57 of the above-entitled Court, located at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Defendant Daniel Masterson (“Masterson”) will, and hereby does, demur to Plaintiffs Chrissie Carnell Bixler, Cedric Bixler-Zavala, Jane Doe #1, Marie Bobette Riales, and Jane Doe #2’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) in its entirety, including causes of action One through Five. As set forth in the concurrently-filed Declaration of Andrew B. Brettler (“Brettler Decl.”), Plaintiffs’ counsel failed and/or refused to meet and confer as required by California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(a)(1)-(3) regarding the Demurrer before the original response deadline. Accordingly, on March 30, 2020, Martin F. Hirshland filed a declaration regarding the meet and confer obligations, thereby extending, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(a)(2), Masterson’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to Friday, May 1, 2020. On March 31, 2020, as also set forth in the Brettler Decl., counsel for the parties attempted to meet and confer telephonically, as required by the Code. Notwithstanding Masterson’s counsel’s efforts to address Plaintiffs’ pleading deficiencies in the Complaint, Plaintiffs’ counsel refused to engage in a substantive discussion of those issues and prematurely terminated the meet and confer conference, thereby necessitating this filing. This Demurrer is made pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10(b), 430.10(d) and 430.10(e), upon the grounds that (1) Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 lack legal capacity to bring their causes of action as anonymous “Jane Doe” parties; (2) there is a defect, or misjoinder, of parties and claims, causing prejudice to Masterson; and (3) all Plaintiffs’ claims fail to state facts sufficient to constitute any cause of action against Masterson. // // //