123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE § 128.7
68062320v1
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
that on a date and time to be determined
1
or as soon thereafter as this matter may be heard in Department 37 of the above-entitled Court, located at 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, Defendants Religious Technology Center (“RTC”) and Church of Scientology International (“CSI” and collectively with RTC, the “Defendants”) will and hereby do move the Court for an Order imposing monetary sanctions jointly and severally on Plaintiff Valerie Haney, her counsel Robert M. Thompson, and Mr. Thompson’s law firm, Thompson Law Offices, P.C.,
2
pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7 in the amount of $160,220 for (1) reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred and anticipated to be incurred by Defendants in connection with opposing Plaintiff’s meritless motion for reconsideration; and (2) reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred and anticipated to be incurred by Defendants for filing and arguing this motion to address Plaintiff’s violation of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7. This motion is based upon the following grounds: on March 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed in this action a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 30, 2020 ruling granting the motions of Defendants to compel religious arbitration. The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions made in Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration are not warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7(b)(2). Moreover, the allegations and other factual contentions of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration do not have evidentiary support. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7(b)(3). In addition, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration violates the requirements of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1008 for motions for reconsideration and is therefore sanctionable under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1008(d).
1
Due to the COVID-19 orders in place, it is not currently possible for Defendants to reserve a hearing date for this motion. Defendants understand that the Court will select a hearing date and request that this motion be set for August 11, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. to be heard concurrently with Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration.
2
Sanctions may be awarded against Plaintiff Valerie Haney if this Court finds a violation of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7(b)(3). If the Court finds only a violation of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 128.7(b)(2), then sanctions should be awarded against Plaintiff’s counsel.
Seeid.
§ 128.7(d)(1).
January 14, 2021, at 8:30 a.m.