E
PIC
’
S
R
EPLY
M
EMORANDUM
C
ASE
N
O
.
4:20-
CV
-05640-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Paul J. Riehle (SBN 115199) paul.riehle@faegredrinker.com
FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
Four Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Christine A. Varney (
pro hac vice
) cvarney@cravath.com Katherine B. Forrest (
pro hac vice
) kforrest@cravath.com Gary A. Bornstein (
pro hac vice
) gbornstein@cravath.com Yonatan Even (
pro hac vice
) yeven@cravath.com Lauren A. Moskowitz (
pro hac vice
) lmoskowitz@cravath.com M. Brent Byars (
pro hac vice
) mbyars@cravath.com
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
825 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
Attorneys for Plaintiff Epic Games, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
EPIC GAMES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. APPLE INC., Defendant
.
Case No. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF EPIC GAMES, INC.’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Date: September 28, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. (via Zoom Platform) Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 90 Filed 09/18/20 Page 1 of 21
E
PIC
’
S
R
EPLY
M
EMORANDUM
ii C
ASE
N
O
.
4:20-
CV
-05640-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Under the rule of reason, Apple’s conduct has anti-competitive effects. ..........................................................................................................9
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 90 Filed 09/18/20 Page 2 of 21
E
PIC
’
S
R
EPLY
M
EMORANDUM
iii C
ASE
N
O
.
4:20-
CV
-05640-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page(s)
Acquaire v. Canada Dry Bottling Co.
, 24 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 1994) ..................................................................................... 11, 12
FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.
, 969 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2020) ........................................................................................ 14
Germon v. Times Mirror Co.
, 520 F.2d 786 (9th Cir. 1975) ........................................................................................ 12
Milsen Co. v. Southland Corp.
, 454 F.2d 363 (7th Cir. 1971) ........................................................................................ 12
Newcal Indus., Inc. v. Ikon Office Sols.
, 513 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2008) ........................................................................................ 5
Ohio v. American Express Co.
, 138 S. Ct. 2274 (2018) ................................................................................................... 8
S. Glazer’s Distribs. of Ohio, LLC v. Great Lakes Brewing Co.
, 860 F.3d 844 (6th Cir. 2017) ........................................................................................ 14
Teradata Corp. v. SAP SE
, 2018 WL 6528009 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2018) ............................................................... 5
Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News Am. Mktg. FSI
, 546 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2008) .......................................................................................... 4
trueEX, LLC v. MarkitSERV Ltd.
, 266 F. Supp. 3d 705 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) .......................................................................... 14
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ......................................................................................... 9
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 90 Filed 09/18/20 Page 3 of 21