12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NATURE OF THE ACTION ............................................................................................................ 1
JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........................................................................................................ 2
INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT .................................................................................................. 3
PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................... 3
SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................................... 4 The History of Apple Inc. and the App Store ....................................................................... 4
The Rise of Mobile Gaming .................................................................................................. 5
The Rise of Mobile Gaming Subscription Services .............................................................. 7
The Relevant Market ............................................................................................................. 9
Apple’s Monopoly Power in the iOS Subscription-Based Mobile Gaming Services Market ................................................................................................................................. 10
Apple’s Anticompetitive Conduct in the iOS Mobile Gaming Subscription Services Market ................................................................................................................................. 12
A.
Apple Imposes Technical Restrictions on iOS Devices. ......................................... 12
B.
Apple Imposes Contractual Restrictions on Developers. ........................................ 12
C.
Apple Abuses its App Store Review Guidelines in order to Protect its Monopoly in the Market for iOS Subscription-Based Mobile Gaming Services. .................................................................................................................. 14
D.
Apple Outright Rejected Competing Subscription-Based Mobile Gaming Services. .................................................................................................................. 17
There are no Procompetitive Justifications for Apple’s Misconduct .................................. 18
Anticompetitive Effects in the iOS Subscription-Based Mobile Gaming Services Market ................................................................................................................................. 21
Apple’s History of Monopolistic Abuse ............................................................................. 23
ANTITRUST INJURY ................................................................................................................... 26
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................................ 27
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF .................................................................................................................. 29
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF ............................................................................................. 29
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF ........................................................................................ 30
Case 5:20-cv-07034-NC Document 1 Filed 10/08/20 Page 2 of 39