Tesla's Flying Machine
Description
Nikola Tesla's "flying machine", contrarily to what many have been lead to believe by his misleading late VTOLpatent, was not an aerodynamically based one, but electropropulsive. While his VTOL patent was far ahead of histime, it was of aerodynamic design with wings and propeller - this was *not* his "flying machine". There are severalreferences to his "ideal flying machine" in his interviews and articles. Most have been put together in a pdf withfootnotes in the files area for everyone that is interested in researching this occulted but prime moving life objective.It would be also appropriate to straighten out some facts regarding Tesla's life.These facts are:- UFOs are real, Man-made electropropulsive crafts based on Tesla Technology- The alien scenario is a misleading "charade" to get people "hooked"- Nikola Tesla was never "contacted" by any alien entity!- He "worked out" his Dynamic Theory of Gravity by 1893-4- The US government refused his offer to build and develop this machine, so he most probably turned to theGermans *prior* to WWII as he already had sold them a generator system.- All other saucer shaped projects, information and data (AVRO, Schauberger repulsine, jet aerodynes etc) havebeen most probably released for misdirection and to arrange confusion.- The undeniable occultation of Tesla's name and accomplishments from mainstream media and academia underlinean unexplainable gesture - why else go to such great lengths than to hide something so important?Excerpt from the New York Herald Tribune Oct 15, 1911:“And it makes the aeroplane practical,” I suggested.“Not the aeroplane, the flying machine,” responded Dr. Tesla. “Now you have struck the point in which I am mostdeeply interested — the object toward which I have been devoting my energies for more than twenty years — thedream of my life. It was in seeking the means of making the perfect flying machine that I developed this engine.
9Dracozny,"lifter" technology is only half of the game - it really won'tyield practical results so to speak. The thrust is only a few gramsand can only displace so little in that setup. The complete setup isTesla's "p2" system, involving HV HF AC currents and a HV DCnegative brush discharge *together*, electrifying a hull. The lifteris an "open" setup, only utilizing DC. A hint is given when "pulsed"DC is used on the lifter, as the performance is enhanced, but thesetup does not take advantage due to a missing hull or cage withwhich "tubes of force" can be manipulated/synthesized.I would suggest anyone who wants to try this to use a sphere orwhatever "empty" metal object, preferably with a small openingthrough which a HV source can be fed through an umbilical cord withenough isolation. My first attempt utilized a pseudo saucer shapediron object, a small Tesla coil and a color TV output. Incredibly Igot better results with the DC output of the TV set: the hull wassuspended with rubber bands from the ceiling and it would wobble andoscillate when the discharges were fed to the hull. Sometimes itwould oscillate from side to side and the next disharge would makeit halt instantly, or it would increase the oscillation. If youthink of it, any discharge to the hull would create a virtual LCcircuit with ground through the atmosphere (as with a TC) and itwill ring at a very high frequency. It is clear that 27KV arenowhere near the necessary "Voltage pressure" to see things happen,as over 200KV are needed to probably just get things going. Size isnot an issue, the bigger actually the better. Only corona leakage isand must be considered when upscaling. Tesla also used "Ultraviolet"sources to ionize the atmosphere and make it conduct better which Ibelieve he also used to "bring in" more tubes of force and enhancethe effect.I don't think just a TC would fly, you need a hull to encase it.Consider also that the "standard TC" was only a brief part of Tesla's "evolution" line where he was searching for the mostappropriate "power source". The next step was his Pancake Coil whichwas more ideal and could handle high voltages in less space whenencased and isolated well due to it's flat spiral configuration.Everything he actually developed was for a purpose, and the flatpancake coil was for this type of power source. Infact, fromthe "method of signalling" and "system of signalling" patents youcan see that from one single HF alternator he could energize 2coils, one tuned to an AC 1/2 wave and the other to a DC brush 1/4or 3/4 wave output, hence the name "p2", 2 potentials. He putthis "method" to good work, not only to just send "signals"evidently.RegardsLuke12Dracozny,let me re-iterate what I meant: not one bifilar coil but 2seperate pancake coils, one for AC and the other for the DC brushpowered by the same HF alternator. The coils would be attached to
the hull in a "real" scenario with proper isolation. The DC brush isresponsible for "bringing in" tubes of force, or what Tesla callsthe "veritable rope" which is what keeps or holds the ship inposition or propels it to any desired destination ("a greatpropelling force"). To augment this "veritable rope" Tesla developeda bulb, first in vacuum, then only encapsulated in glass - analuminum hemisphere. This is what he used to "conduct" also power tohis remote devices, and was one of the devices in his "death ray" orTeleforce machine, depending on how it was set up and focused. Thecritical part is electrifying the hull with AC and contemporarilyfeeding it a DC brush - but this can be overcome by using "pressurecontrolled" brush discharges towards the hull to control the brush.The "bulbs" are positioned above (for bouyancy) and in the desireddirection of travel. A completely "inertia free" hull will be solelyelectrified using HV HF AC currents. It will be free to "tumble",rotate or flip so to speak in any direction - good evidence is theheavy precession problem the early saucers were afflicted with.Stability seems to have been reached using microwaves in the IRspectrum around the rim to counter act precession.I think a good testbed is the suspended hull powered by only HVHF AC with such a pancake coil. If there is a good "interaction" thehull will lift being pulled up by the rubber bands as it will "weighless" or even go weightless.RegardsLuke14Yes that is what I meant: the best setup would be to have a largeenough hull to contain a small pancake coil suspended by isolatedrubber bands - only the HF pilot voltage could be fed from theoutside. There are ground problems though which I did not mention.Considering a large hull, there would be another internal hull,isolated and with enough dielectric to avoid breakdown between theexternal and internal hull which is the ship's "floating" ground. Bothcoils' ground are connected to this internal hull. Ideally the coilswould be located between the internal shielded hull and the externalhull away from operators.Luke17Jeff,as you have seen unfortunately it is difficult with all thebrainwashing propaganda to keep the term "UFO" dissociatedfrom "Alien". Normally, when people think of a UFO, they think of ET.When you tell them there's really no ET other than the "BIG LIES" andthat Nikola Tesla is the man behind this occulted flying machine allsorts of wierd ideas start popping up. Cut these out, and you are leftwith a handful of people that really see the picture. This is obviousto me, having researched Tesla's documents, articles and lectures foryears, but not so obvious to others who seem to depend on "webinfo". Itis also obvious to me that these crafts are no regular aerodynamicones, as some still try to describe them (I have been lucky enough alsoto see them in action).I am glad you wish to get the information out, this is what I have