TheHonorableZoeLofgrenPage2
c.DidICEinvestigatewhethertheownersoftheseizeddomainscompliedwiththeDMCA-specifically,whethertheyreceivedanytakedownnoticesfromcopyrightownersfortheallegedly-infringingcontent,whethertheyrespondedtothosenotices,andwhethertheyqualifiedforanyofthesafeharborsfrominfringementliabilityestablishedby17U.S.C.
§
512?
Incertaincircumstances,theissuanceandcomplianceoftheDigitalMillenniumCopyrightAct(DMCA)takedownnoticeswaspartofinvestigations.However,criminalviolationsunder18U.S.C.
§§
2319and2320,aswellastheforfeituresectioncontainedin18U.S.C.
§
2323,areprovisionsCongressenactedseparatefromthetakedownprocessprovidedforundertheDMCA.
d.DidICEinvestigatewhethertheownersoftheseizeddomainswerelocatedintheUnitedStatesandwhethertheallegedlyinfringingcontentwashostedonserverslocatedwithintheUnitedStates?
Yes,ICEdidinvestigatewhethertheownersoftheseizeddomainswerelocatedintheUnitedStates.IfanarrestcanbemadeofanindividualintheUnitedStatesviolatingcriminaltrademarkorcopyrightlaw,ICEwillworkwiththeDepartmentofJustice(DOJ)tomakesuchanarrest.ICEalsoinvestigateswhethertheinfringingcontentishostedonserverswithintheUnitedStates.DuringOperationInOurSites,ICEagentsobtainedseveralcourtorderstoseizeserversintheUnitedStatesthatcontainedinfringingcontent.
2.
If
aninfringingwebsiteishostedintheUnitedStates,meaningthatitsserversand/ordataarewithinthephysicalreachofU.S.lawenforcement,isaseizureofthatwebsite'sdomainnamestillnecessary?
If
so,why?
ICE'sinvestigationofonlinepiracyshowsthatadomainnamehasvaluetothecriminaloperatorofawebsiteillegallyofferingcopyrightedcontent.Sitesillegallyofferingcopyrightedcontentoftenearntremendousprofitfromadvertisingrevenue.Forinstance,ICErecentlyworkedwithDOJtoforfeitaU.S.bankaccountholding$500,000,allegedtobeproceedsfromadvertisingrevenuefromjustoneinfringingsite.Asyoumaybeaware,advertisingrevenueisbaseduponthenumberofvisitstothesite.Often,thenumberofvisitstoapiratesitebuildsovertimeasitsreputationincreases.Industrysourcesadviseitcantake9to15monthsforawebsiteillegallydistributingcopyrightedmaterialtobuildupenoughtraffictoprofitfromthecriminalactivity.Thegreatestprofitisearnedbywellknownandpopular"piratesites."Indeed,thedomainnamesometimesbecomessynonymouswithcriminalcopyrightinfringement.Therefore,inadditiontoseizingaserverandanyavailableassets,seizingthedomainnames,under18U.S.C.
§
2323,isanothertoollawenforcementcanusetodisruptcriminalactivity.Thecriminalscannotsimplyreusethesamedomainnameandstartwiththesamelevelofprofitability.
If
thecriminalchoosestoreengageinsuchillegalconduct,heorshemustbegintosocializeanewdomainname.