Cumulatve wages los compared o whie non-Hispanic me
HISPANIC WOMEN State or territoryTotal
Alabama-$91-$34-$125-$862AlaskaArizona-$1,178-$442-$1,620-$141Arkansas-$134-$50-$184-$210California-$10,537-$3,951-$14,488-$798Colorado-$830-$311-$1,141-$128Connectcu-$578-$217-$795-$334Delaware-$135Disricof Columbia-$120-$45-$165-$541Florida-$3,037-$1,139-$4,176-$1,784Georgia-$728-$273-$1,001-$2,370Hawaii-$79-$30-$109Idaho-$121-$45-$166Illinois-$1,791-$672-$2,463-$1,169Indiana-$236-$88-$324-$315Iowa-$128-$48-$176-$77Kansas-$211-$79-$290-$82Kenucky-$73-$27-$100-$159Louisiana-$157-$59-$216-$1,270MaineMaryland-$644-$242-$886-$1,323Massachuses-$764-$287-$1,051-$491Michigan-$317-$119-$435-$730Minnesoa-$221-$83-$304-$193Mississippi-$741Missouri-$149-$56-$205-$335MonanaNebraska-$115-$43-$158-$55Nevada-$518-$194-$712-$132New HampshireNew Jersey-$2,061-$773-$2,834-$1,116New Mexico-$545-$205-$750New York-$2,854-$1,070-$3,924-$2,095Norh Carolina-$583-$218-$801-$1,180Norh DakoaOhio-$261-$98-$359-$782Oklahoma-$258-$97-$355-$161Oregon-$336-$126-$462-$36Pennsylvania-$657-$246-$903-$817
Cumulave cost of occupaonal segregaonCumulave cost of industry segregaonCumulave cost of occupaonal segregaon
 
Rhode Island-$136-$51-$187Souh Carolina-$148-$55-$203-$1,001Souh DakoaTennessee-$203-$76-$279-$568Texas-$6,663-$2,499-$9,162-$1,580Uah-$382-$143-$526VermonVirginia-$722-$271-$993-$1,375Washingon-$788-$295-$1,083-$223Wes VirginiaWisconsin-$233-$87-$320-$211WyomingPuero Rico-$19-$7-$27-$15Noe: Blank cells are where he worker sample size for Hispanic women or Black women in he sa Source: U.S. Census Bureau. American Communiy Survey 1-year Estmaes Deailed Tables. Tables: B20017B; B20017H. 2019. Raw Daa. (Washingon DC: U.S. Census Bureau, March 9, 2022); Paul, Za in he labor marke: A nuanced view of penaltes a he inersecton of race and gender."; Bahn and gaps faced by Latna women in he Unied Saes.” Calculaed by he U.S. Deparmen of Labor Wo mehodology: Paul, Kaw, Hamilon, and Dariy, using a Blinder-Oaxaca wage decompositon o mod racial wage gap, found ha dierences in indusry explained 9.6% of he wage gap beween full-tm non-Hispanic men ages 25 o 64, while dierences in occupaton explained 18.1% of he gap. Subse McGrew replicaed he analysis using daa on Hispanic women and whie non-Hispanic men and fo wage gap relatve o whie men could be explained by dierences in indusry, while 20% was explai
 
 in 2019, in millions
LACK WOMENTotal
-$457-$1,319-$75-$216-$111-$321-$423-$1,221-$68-$196-$177-$511-$72-$207-$287-$828-$946-$2,730-$1,257-$3,627-$620-$1,790-$167-$482-$41-$118-$44-$126-$84-$243-$674-$1,944-$702-$2,025-$260-$751-$387-$1,116-$103-$296-$393-$1,134-$178-$513-$29-$85-$70-$202-$592-$1,707-$1,111-$3,207-$626-$1,806-$415-$1,197-$86-$247-$19-$55-$433-$1,250
Cumulave cost of industry segregaon
View on Scribd