IR OIG 21-117 Page 2 of 27
posed by the spread of COVID-19. The complainant identified the following DOH managers as subjects of the allegations: Courtney Coppola, Dr. Shamarial Roberson; Dr. Carina Blackmore; and Scott Pritchard.
(Exhibit 1)
Based solely on the nature of the complainant’s allegations as presented, the OIG notified the complainant on May 28, 2021, of the approval of whistle-blower status, in accordance with sections 112.3187 – 112.31895, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and initiated a whistle-blower investigation.
If found to be true, the subjects may have violated one or more of the directives listed in the GOVERNING DIRECTIVES and DEFINITIONS
section of this report.
Following a review of the original complaint documentation, subsequent documentation received, and correspondence with the complainant, the specific allegations investigated, and conclusions reached, are listed below:
Allegation 1: Dr. Roberson directed the complainant and other DOH staff to falsify COVID-19 positivity rates. Unsubstantiated.
Based upon an analysis of the available evidence, there is insufficient evidence to clearly prove or disprove the alleged conduct, as described by the complainant, occurred.
Allegation 2: Ms. Coppola pressured the complainant to falsify COVID-19 positivity rates as directed by Dr. Roberson. Unsubstantiated.
Based upon an analysis of the available evidence, there is insufficient evidence to clearly prove or disprove the alleged conduct, as described by the complainant, occurred.
Allegation 3: At the direction of Dr. Roberson and Dr. Blackmore, the calculation of new case positivity was misrepresented on the DOH COVID-19 Data and Surveillance Dashboard. Unfounded.
Based upon an analysis of the available evidence, the alleged conduct, as described by the complainant, did not occur.
Allegation 4: Dr. Roberson, Dr. Blackmore, and Mr. Pritchard directed the complainant to restrict access to underlying data that supported what appeared on the COVID-19 Data and Surveillance Dashboard. Exonerated.
Based upon an analysis of the available evidence, the alleged conduct, as described by the complainant, occurred but was not found to be a violation of any governing directive. Details of the investigation and findings can be found in the INVESTIGATIVE DETAILS section of this report.
3
The complainant identified additional allegations and subjects in their Florida Commission on Human Relations written complaint. However, all other allegations, beyond those listed in this investigative report, were not within the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Health (DOH), Office of Inspector General (OIG) and are not addressed by this report.
4
The whistle-blower complainant will be referred to as “complainant” herein.
5
In accordance with 112.3188, Florida Statutes, granting of Whistle-blower status affords the complainant protection from their name or identity being disclosed throughout the investigation and investigative report, unless specifically exempted in statute or in cases where the disclosure is necessary to the investigation.
6
See page 13.