39 views

Uploaded by zeshankhan4321_50832

DDD

- Ansys Workbench Basics Manual
- From 2D to 3D wings
- Aerodynamics
- Design of the Wind Turbine Airfoil Family RISØ-A-XX - DTU Orbit Ris_r_1024.PDF
- Valve Selection Handbook - Check Valves
- Gurney Flap
- Ducted Prop for STOL Paper
- Multi-Objective Numerical Optimization 2008.pdf
- Aerodynamics Questions and Suggested Answers 4
- PENILAIAN KURIKULUM 2
- Aircraft Design With Maneuver and Gust Load Alleviation
- Army - fm1 514 - Fundamentals of Rotor and Power Train Maintenance - Techniques and Procedures
- aerodynamics
- Kholopov Harm Pract1
- Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Tri - Wing Tiltrotor
- Wind Fence 00
- Lecture+3a-Basic+Aircraft.ppt
- 10.1.1.124
- trainig matlab
- Computational Study Into the Flow Field Developed Around a Cascade Around NACA0012 Airfoil

You are on page 1of 70

AVIONICS DEPARTMENT

PAF KIET

UDPATES

Mid-term grades

Team project

Lab session to work on project this week (Thursday and Friday)

Literature review and motor selection report due on March 25 (will likely push

this back a week)

Mid-Term Exam

Monday, March 21 in class

Covers Chapter 4 and Chapter 5.1 5.15

Open book / open notes but no time to study during the exam

Sample Mid-Term with Solution on line

Review Session: Tuesday, March 15, Crawford auditorium 112, 8 10 pm

PRO|ENGINEER DESIGN CONTEST

Winner

Either increase your grade by an entire letter (C B), or

Buy your most expensive textbook next semester

Create most elaborate, complex, stunning Aerospace Related project in

ProEngineer

Criteria: Assembly and/or exploded view

PRO|ENGINEER CONTEST

PRO|ENGINEER CONTEST

If you do the PRO|E challenge

Do not let it consume you!

SKETCHING CONTEST

Choose any aerospace device you like (airplane, rocket, spacecraft, satellite,

helicopter, etc.) but only 1 entry per person

Drawing must be in isometric view on 8.5 x 11 inch paper

Free hand sketching, no rulers, compass, etc.

Submit by April 22, 2011 by 5:00pm

Winner: 10 points on mid-term, 2

nd

place: 7 points, 3

rd

place: 5 points

Decided by TAs and other Aerospace Faculty

DO NOT SUBMIT

READING AND HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS

Reading: Introduction to Flight, by John D. Anderson, Jr.

For April 4

th

lecture: Chapter 5, Sections 5.13-5.19

Read these sections carefully, most interesting portions of Ch. 5

Lecture-Based Homework Assignment:

Problems: 5.7, 5.11, 5.13, 5.15, 5.17, 5.19

DUE: Friday, March 25, 2011 by 5pm

Turn in hard copy of homework

Also be sure to review and be familiar with textbook examples in

Chapter 5

ANSWERS TO LECTURE HOMEWORK

5.7: Cp = -3.91

5.11: Cp = -0.183

Be careful here, if you check the Mach number it is around 0.71, so the flow is

compressible and the formula for Cp based on Bernoullis equation is not valid. To

calculate the pressure coefficient, first calculate

the temperature from the energy equation. Finally make use of the isentropic relations

and the definition of Cp given in Equation 5.27

5.13: c

l

= 0.97

Make use of Prandtl-Glauert rule

5.15: M

cr

= 0.62

Use graphical technique of Section 5.9

Verify using Excel or Matlab

5.17: = 30

5.19: D = 366 lb

Remember that in steady, level flight the airplanes lift must balance its weight

You may also assume that all lift is derived from the wings (this is not really true

because the fuselage and horizontal tail also contribute to the airplane lift). Also assume

that the wings can be approximated by a thin flat plate

Remember that Equation 5.50 gives o in radians

LIFT, DRAG, AND MOMENT COEFFICIENTS (5.3)

Behavior of L, D, and M depend on o, but also on velocity and altitude

V

, compressibility

Characterize behavior of L, D, M with coefficients (c

l

, c

d

, c

m

)

( ) Re , ,

2

1

2

1

2

2

=

=

=

M f c

S q

L

S V

L

c

Sc V L

l

l

l

o

(called similarity parameters)

M

, Re

M

, Re

c

l

, c

d

, c

m

identical

SAMPLE DATA

Lift coefficient (or lift) linear

variation with angle of attack, a

Cambered airfoils have

positive lift when o = 0

Symmetric airfoils have

zero lift when o = 0

At high enough angle of attack,

the performance of the airfoil

rapidly degrades stall

c

l

Cambered airfoil has

lift at o=0

At negative o airfoil

will have zero lift

SAMPLE DATA: NACA 23012 AIRFOIL

Lift

Coefficient

c

l

Moment

Coefficient

c

m, c/4

o

Flow separation

Stall

AIRFOIL DATA (5.4 AND APPENDIX D)

NACA 23012 WING SECTION

c

l

c

m

,

c

/

4

Re dependence at high o

Separation and Stall

o

c

l

c

d

c

m

,

a

.

c

.

c

l

vs. o

Independent of Re

c

d

vs. o

Dependent on Re

c

m,a.c.

vs. c

l

very flat

R=Re

EXAMPLE: SLATS AND FLAPS

EXAMPLE: BOEING 727 FLAPS/SLATS

Flap extended

Flap retracted

AIRFOIL DATA (5.4 AND APPENDIX D)

NACA 1408 WING SECTION

Flaps shift lift curve

Effective increase in camber of airfoil

PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION AND LIFT

Lift comes from pressure distribution

over top (suction surface) and bottom

(pressure surface)

Lift coefficient also result of pressure

distribution

PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, C

P

(5.6)

Use non-dimensional description, instead of plotting actual values of pressure

Pressure distribution in aerodynamic literature often given as C

p

So why do we care?

Distribution of C

p

leads to value of c

l

Easy to get pressure data in wind tunnels

Shows effect of M

on c

l

2

2

1

V

p p

q

p p

C

p

EXAMPLE: C

P

CALCULATION

For M

C

p

= C

p,0

= 0.5 = const

COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTION:

EFFECT OF M

ON C

P

2

0 ,

2

1

V

p p

C

p

M

2 2

0 ,

1

5 . 0

1

=

M M

C

C

p

p

For M

C

p

= C

p,0

= 0.5 = const

Effect of compressibility

(M

absolute magnitude of C

p

as

M

increases

Called: Prandtl-Glauert Rule

Prandtl-Glauert rule applies for 0.3 < M

< 0.7

COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTION:

EFFECT OF M

ON C

P

M

OBTAINING LIFT COEFFICIENT FROM C

P

(5.7)

( )

2

0 ,

0

, ,

1

1

=

~

}

M

c

c

dx C C

c

c

l

l

c

upper p lower p l

COMPRESSIBILITY CORRECTION SUMMARY

If M

0

> 0.3, use a compressibility correction for C

p

, and c

l

Compressibility corrections gets poor above M

0

~ 0.7

This is because shock waves may start to form over parts of airfoil

Many proposed correction methods, but a very good on is: Prandtl-Glauert Rule

C

p,0

and c

l,0

are the low-speed (uncorrected) pressure and lift coefficients

This is lift coefficient from Appendix D in Anderson

C

p

and c

l

are the actual pressure and lift coefficients at M

2

0 ,

1

=

M

C

C

p

p

2

0 ,

1

=

M

c

c

l

l

CRITICAL MACH NUMBER, M

CR

(5.9)

As air expands around top surface near leading edge, velocity and M will increase

Local M > M

Flow over airfoil may have

sonic regions even though

freestream M

< 1

INCREASED DRAG!

CRITICAL FLOW AND SHOCK WAVES

M

CR

CRITICAL FLOW AND SHOCK WAVES

bubble of supersonic flow

AIRFOIL THICKNESS SUMMARY

Which creates most lift?

Thicker airfoil

Which has higher critical Mach number?

Thinner airfoil

Which is better?

Application dependent!

Note: thickness is relative

to chord in all cases

Ex. NACA 0012 12 %

AIRFOIL THICKNESS: WWI AIRPLANES

English Sopwith Camel

German Fokker Dr-1

Higher maximum C

L

Internal wing structure

Higher rates of climb

Improved maneuverability

Thin wing, lower maximum C

L

Bracing wires required high drag

THICKNESS-TO-CHORD RATIO TRENDS

A-10

Root: NACA 6716

TIP: NACA 6713

F-15

Root: NACA 64A(.055)5.9

TIP: NACA 64A203

MODERN AIRFOIL SHAPES

http://www.nasg.com/afdb/list-airfoil-e.phtml

Root Mid-Span Tip

Boeing 737

SUMMARY OF AIRFOIL DRAG (5.12)

w d p d f d d

wave pressure friction

c c c c

D D D D

, , ,

+ + =

+ + =

Only at transonic and

supersonic speeds

D

wave

=0 for subsonic speeds

below M

drag-divergence

Profile Drag

Profile Drag coefficient

relatively constant with

M

at subsonic speeds

FINITE WINGS

INFINITE VERSUS FINITE WINGS

S

b

AR

2

Aspect Ratio

b: wingspan

S: wing area

High AR

Low AR

AIRFOILS VERSUS WINGS

Upper surface (upper side of wing): low pressure

Recall discussion on exactly why this is physically

Recall discussion on how to show this mathematically

AIRFOILS VERSUS WINGS

Upper surface (upper side of wing): low pressure

Lower surface (underside of wing): high pressure

Flow always desires to go from high pressure to low pressure

Flow wraps around wing tips

FINITE WINGS

Front View

Wing Tip

Vortices

EXAMPLE: 737 WINGLETS

EXAMPLES: AIRCRAFT WAKE TURBULENCE

FINITE WING DOWNWASH (5.13)

Wing tip vortices induce a small downward component of air velocity near

wing by dragging surrounding air with them

Downward component of velocity is called downwash, w

Local relative wind

Two Consequences:

1. Increase in drag, called induced drag (drag due to lift)

2. Angle of attack is effectively reduced, o

eff

as compared with V

Chord line

ANGLE OF ATTACK DEFINITIONS

o

geometric

: what you see, what you would see in a wind tunnel

Simply look at angle between incoming relative wind and chord line

o

effective

: what the airfoil sees locally

Angle between local flow direction and chord line

Small than o

geometric

because of downwash

o

induced

: difference between these two angles

Downwash has induced this change in angle of attack

induced effective geometric

o o o + =

INFINITE WING DESCRIPTION

LIFT is always perpendicular to the RELATIVE WIND

LIFT

Relative Wind, V

FINITE WING DESCRIPTION

Relative wind gets tilted downward under the airfoil

LIFT is still always perpendicular to the RELATIVE WIND

Lift vector is tilted back so a component of L acts in direction normal to

incoming relative wind results in a new type of drag

induced effective geometric

o o o + =

Induced Drag, D

i

3 PHYSICAL INTERPRETATIONS

1. Local relative wind is canted downward, lift vector is tilted back so a

component of L acts in direction normal to incoming relative wind

2. Wing tip vortices alter surface pressure distributions in direction of

increased drag

3. Vortices contain rotational energy put into flow by propulsion system to

overcome induced drag

INDUCED DRAG: IMPLICATIONS FOR WINGS

d D

l L

c C

c C

>

<

Finite Wing

Infinite Wing

(Appendix D)

V

o o <

eff

HOW TO ESTIMATE INDUCED DRAG

i i

i i

L D

L D

o

o

=

= sin

Local flow velocity in vicinity of wing is inclined downward

Lift vector remains perpendicular to local relative wind and is tiled back

through an angle o

i

Drag is still parallel to freestream

Tilted lift vector contributes a drag component

HOW TO ESTIMATE INDUCED DRAG

Calculation of angle o

i

is not trivial (MAE 3241)

Value of o

i

depends on distribution of downwash along span of wing

Downwash is governed by distribution of lift over span of wing

WHY A LIFT DISTRIBUTION?

CHORD MAY VARY IN LENGTH

Thinner wing near tip

delay onset of high-speed

compressibility effects

Retain aileron control

WHY A LIFT DISTRIBUTION?

SHAPE OF AIRFOIL MAY VARY ALONG WING

NACA 64A210

NACA 64A209

F-111

WHY A LIFT DISTRIBUTION?

WING (AIRFOIL) MAY BE TWISTED

P&W / G.E. GP7000 FAMILY

HOW TO ESTIMATE INDUCED DRAG

Special Case: Elliptical Lift Distribution (produced by elliptical wing)

Lift/unit span varies elliptically along span

This special case produces a uniform downwash

AR

C

C

AR

C

S q

D

AR

C

S q

AR

C

L L D

AR

C

L

i D

L i

L L

i i

L

i

t

t

t t

o

t

o

2

,

2

2

=

=

= = =

=

Key Results:

Elliptical Lift Distribution

ELLIPTICAL LIFT DISTRIBUTION

For a wing with same airfoil shape across span and no twist, an elliptical lift

distribution is characteristic of an elliptical wing plan form

Example: Supermarine Spitfire

AR

C

C

AR

C

L

i D

L

i

t

t

o

2

,

=

=

Key Results:

Elliptical Lift Distribution

HOW TO ESTIMATE INDUCED DRAG

For all wings in general

Define a span efficiency factor, e (also called span efficiency factor)

Elliptical planforms, e = 1

The word planform means shape as view by looking down on the wing

For all other planforms, e < 1

0.85 < e < 0.99

eAR

C

C

L

i D

t

2

,

=

Span Efficiency Factor

Goes with square of C

L

Inversely related to AR

Drag due to lift

DRAG POLAR

eAR

C

c C

L

d D

t

2

+ =

Total Drag = Profile Drag + Induced Drag

{

c

d

EXAMPLE: U2 VS. F-15

Cruise at 70,000 ft

Air density highly reduced

Flies at slow speeds, low q

high angle of attack, high C

L

U2 AR ~ 14.3 (WHY?)

eAR

C

c C

L

d D

t

2

+ =

L

SC V W L

2

2

1

= =

Flies at high speed (and lower

altitudes), so high q

low

angle of attack, low C

L

Low AR (WHY?)

U2 F-15

EXAMPLE: U2 SPYPLANE

Cruise at 70,000 ft

Out of USSR missile range

Air density,

, highly

reduced

In steady-level flight, L = W

As

reduced, C

L

must

increase (angle of attack must

increase)

AR C

D

U2 AR ~ 14.3

eAR

C

c C

L

d D

t

2

+ =

L

SC V W L

2

2

1

= =

EXAMPLE: F-15 EAGLE

Flies at high speed at low angle

of attack low C

L

Induced drag < Profile Drag

Low AR, Low S

eAR

C

c C

L

d D

t

2

+ =

L

SC V W L

2

2

1

= =

WHY HIGH AR ON PREDATOR?

CHANGES IN LIFT SLOPE: SYMMETRIC WINGS

o

geom

c

l

Infinite wing:

AR=

Infinite wing:

AR=10

Infinite wing:

AR=5

c

l

=1.0

Slope, a

0

= 2t/rad ~ 0.11/deg

CHANGES IN LIFT SLOPE: CAMBERED WINGS

o

geom

c

l

Infinite wing:

AR=

Infinite wing:

AR=10

Infinite wing:

AR=5

c

l

=1.0

Zero-lift angle of attack independent of AR

Slope, a

0

= 2t/rad ~ 0.11/deg

FINITE WING CHANGE IN LIFT SLOPE

In a wind tunnel, the easiest thing to

measure is the geometric angle of attack

For infinite wings, there is no induced

angle of attack

The angle you see = the angle the

infinite wing sees

With finite wings, there is an induced

angle of attack

The angle you see the angle the

finite wing sees

i eff geom

o o o + =

Infinite Wing

Finite Wing

o

geom

= o

eff

+ o

i

= o

eff

o

geom

= o

eff

+ o

i

FINITE WING CHANGE IN LIFT SLOPE

Lift curve for a finite wing has a smaller

slope than corresponding curve for an

infinite wing with same airfoil cross-section

Figure (a) shows infinite wing, o

i

= 0, so

plot is C

L

vs. o

geom

or o

eff

and slope is a

0

Figure (b) shows finite wing, o

i

0

Plot C

L

vs. what we see, o

geom

, (or

what would be easy to measure in a

wind tunnel), not what wing sees, o

eff

1. Effect of finite wing is to reduce lift curve slope

Finite wing lift slope = o = dC

L

/do

2. At C

L

= 0, o

i

= 0, so o

L=0

same for infinite or

finite wings

i eff geom

o o o + =

Infinite Wing

Finite Wing

SUMMARY: INFINITE VS. FINITE WINGS

Properties of a finite wing differ in two major respects from infinite wings:

1. Addition of induced drag

2. Lift curve for a finite wing has smaller slope than corresponding lift curve for

infinite wing with same airfoil cross section (depends on AR)

EXTRA CREDIT

What is the aspect ratio of this airplane?

What is the aspect ratio of a 747?

What aerodynamics decisions went into selected the A380 aspect ratio?

What non-aerodynamics decisions went into limiting the A380 aspect ratio?

A380 burns about four liters (one gallon) of fuel per passenger every

80 miles and can fly some 8,000 nautical miles and seat as many as

550 passengers.

- Ansys Workbench Basics ManualUploaded byOmar Alzuabi
- From 2D to 3D wingsUploaded byentalto1
- AerodynamicsUploaded byvahid
- Design of the Wind Turbine Airfoil Family RISØ-A-XX - DTU Orbit Ris_r_1024.PDFUploaded byNatesan Mahendran
- Valve Selection Handbook - Check ValvesUploaded byPalazzo345
- Gurney FlapUploaded byTitter Buck
- Ducted Prop for STOL PaperUploaded byapi-3725874
- Multi-Objective Numerical Optimization 2008.pdfUploaded byxem3
- Aerodynamics Questions and Suggested Answers 4Uploaded byApikSanPewPew
- PENILAIAN KURIKULUM 2Uploaded byorangramai
- Aircraft Design With Maneuver and Gust Load AlleviationUploaded byNeo
- Army - fm1 514 - Fundamentals of Rotor and Power Train Maintenance - Techniques and ProceduresUploaded byMeowmix
- aerodynamicsUploaded bySreedev Das
- Kholopov Harm Pract1Uploaded byMiljan Pajovic
- Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Tri - Wing TiltrotorUploaded byMaurizio Bernasconi
- Wind Fence 00Uploaded bylefag
- Lecture+3a-Basic+Aircraft.pptUploaded byBianca Parsons
- 10.1.1.124Uploaded byscrewyouassholes
- trainig matlabUploaded byDaniel Nima Santander
- Computational Study Into the Flow Field Developed Around a Cascade Around NACA0012 AirfoilUploaded byKapsalis Panagiotis
- 321Uploaded byAdeel Chughtai
- Control Valve ServomotorUploaded byPopeyeElectricman
- 19800006787_1980006787Uploaded bypaulopaupitz
- Supplemental Notes - Aerodynamics and Inertial ForceUploaded byFeeling_so_fly
- Flow Induced Vibration of a Light Circular CylinderUploaded bybanad
- Achieving_Subsea_Pipeline_Burial_And_Stability_Wit.pdfUploaded byAnonymous hfRlT9SD1
- Barber - The Aeroplane SpeaksUploaded byPeter Sobers
- Matlab softwareUploaded bysaad
- Blower-type Wind Tunnel.pdfUploaded bypreshit
- 1-s2.0-S1000936113002069-mainUploaded byPritesh Modi

- CE 45-Hydraulics SyllabusUploaded bypicefeati
- venturi meterUploaded byChristopher Garcia
- Flow Over Notches and WeirsUploaded byKendra Kaiser
- Answer 2 16 Marks HMTUploaded byfahamith ahamed
- Chapter 09Uploaded byosoreneg
- Influence of Humidity on Clogging of Flat and PleaUploaded byalifia fitri
- Hydraulics Topic 2 Uniform Flow in Open ChannelUploaded byAnep Ameer
- Ansys-14-Theory.pdfUploaded byrochman
- Using FioSIM3 to Simulate Airfoil - Student ProjectUploaded byicetrap
- Bernoulli’s theorem ExperimentUploaded byT/ROX
- 1Uploaded byfoxinboxfox
- Extra Momentum Transfer QuestionsUploaded bya
- Viscosity Ratio of SlurriesUploaded byTama
- AGA3Uploaded byMalouk Cheniouni
- Mass Flow RateUploaded byrugun
- Reading Material Ch 15 Well Problem IdentificationUploaded bySagar Dadhich
- FM Sol Chap12-131.pdfUploaded bykadricek
- gasDynamics.pdfUploaded byPeri Pitriadi Caraloz
- Lombardo Gregg1989Uploaded byJose Maria Santos
- Advanced Computational Flow AnalysisUploaded byDarren Pinto
- COMSOL Fluid Mechanics ProblemsUploaded byZhiyong Huang
- Flow Through a Venturi FlumeUploaded bynaeem
- k17396_nrt_datasheet.pdfUploaded bySimon Koutoua
- SampleUploaded bygjan_06
- FF_Notes.pdfUploaded byasim zeeshan
- Defoamer.Tarek_Kakhia.pdfUploaded byTahir Iqbal
- Water Hammer Damper Tank Hydropack ExampleUploaded byjajang nurjaman
- DESIGN AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF SPRAY DRYER USING CFD.Uploaded byIJAR Journal
- University Question Paper 3Uploaded byMahendra Kumar
- moody diagram.xlsUploaded byASQ