Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Collaborative Structures
Three ways of organizing P.D
1. 2. 3. PATNERSHIP PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS STUDY GROUPS
Underlying Assumption
The context within which teachers work, provides worthwhile content for their collaboration
Addressing issues related to their own practices allows teachers to..
Develop new practices that are directly related to their local
contexts
Unlike professional development experiences designed by others or ones that provide teachers with an innovation to implement,
Collegiality, cooperation and communication among teachers are valued by the school and extended communities
School and extended communities encourages teachers to work collaboratively with each other, other professionals and in partnership with scientists and mathematicians Isolation of working individually in classroom.>to sharing ideas and new learning with peers and content experts in a supportive group fosters a sense of collegiality and professionalism among teachers
Quality science and mathematics education is a community responsibility requiring collaboration and input from all.
Collaborative structures for professional development are based on the assumption that the quality and effectiveness of science and maths teaching/learning are the responsibility of the larger community ,not teachers in the k-12 schools. Both education for students and p.d for teachers can be enhanced by
Learning is a social activity, and adults benefits from interacting with other individuals who have similar purposes and interests as they learn
Collaboration can nurture a professional community, developing norms of collegiality, continuous improvement, and experimentation. Common interests, experiences, and frequent interaction result in a common language regarding issues in sc and math that encourages frequent communication about improvement. Teachers are no longer isolated in their classrooms, struggling alone with issues of teaching and learning.
It is vital that all involved have opportunities to appreciate and recognize the values of each partner discipline. Scientists and mathematicians must understand the needs in science and opmental learning.
Sometimes ,issues arise regarding the expectations that scientists and mathematicians have when entering in partnership.
That they are there to fix the situation, believing the
Teachers sometimes fear interference by outsiders, especially those whom they view as the ultimate experts. They can feel scared by the presence of scientists and mathematicians and not recognize that they bring their own