DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION SHEET

Project Document Type

ORF URMed UMTS Optimisation Cluster optimisation report

Document File Name
Document Title Date Created Version Number Date Last Modified Author Approved by: Confidentiality

CO_Marseille_cluster_E_V1-0
Cluster Optimisation report Marseille Cluster E 19/05/04 1.0 04/06/04 Luis Rodriguez Pierre Cordonnier ORF Project Confidential

1
Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION REPORT
Reference
MARSEILLE CLUSTER E
Start Date:19/4/2004 End Date: 14/5/2004
Reported Date:19/5/2004 Luis RODRIGUEZ Approved by Pierre CORDONNIER

INTRODUCTION

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION 2. EQUIPMENT, TOOLS AND LOGS 3. INITIAL STATUS

4. OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS
5. CS VOICE RESULTS 6. CSD RESULTS 7. SUMMARY

3
Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0

GENERAL DESCRIPTION
 Light Cluster description
 Type of cluster : Urban  This cluster started with some sites down and the Sites Shake Down

not ready, the Preliminary works (Neighbour list Check, Parameters Check) were not done by WFI Engineering group. The reason to start the cluster under theses condition was due to the Schedule.  Sites/Sectors:
 15 Sites/36 Sectors available for the First Pass.  18 Sites/42 Sectors available for Second Pass.  18 Sites/42 Sectors available for Third Pass.  21 Sites/51 Sectors planned.  Sites Indoor were not taken in to the count : Palais des Congress on

air, and 2 VLA

4
Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0

GENERAL DESCRIPTION
 Name of LA sites:
 Vaufreges  Endoume  Les Goudes

Number, Name of sites in VLA, PA:
 Bonneveine VLA  Marzargues VLA  Prado PA

 Stade Velodrome Nord (Indoor)
 Stade Velodrome Sud (Indoor)

5
Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0

0 .GENERAL DESCRIPTION  Global map with Sites 6 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

0 .GENERAL DESCRIPTION  DT Routes 7 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

14 V8  Binning use (Couei): 1 second  Reference log files used for analysis  CS VOICE log files and Drive Test date 8 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.EQUIPMENT & TOOLS & LOGS  Tools version Tool Mobile Qualcomm Version WZ4.3.38 ML8729B 1.201PAT Mobile Trace Scanner Post-Processing Planning XCAL ANRITSU XCAP Parcell 1.0 .

0 .EQUIPMENT & TOOLS & LOGS  Reference log files used for analysis  CSD log files and Drive Test date  NORTEL UTRAN load week 10 9 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

The red circles show the areas with low Ec/Io values that should be optimized Site Down Areas to Optim.0 . • • • 10 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1. Weak Cov. Area.CLUSTER INITIAL STATUS  MAPS FROM THE FIRST DT  UE Ec/Io Finger Dominant (Unloaded CS Long Call) • The Finger Dominant info shows the best Finger from the UE. It does not take into account multipath and soft HO gain The best Finger Ec/Io gives an idea of the areas with lack of dominance (low Ec/Io values) or coverage problems.

CLUSTER INITIAL STATUS  MAPS FROM THE FIRST DT  Call Events (Unloaded CS Long Call) • Many Drops were counted due to the route was extended to the hilly area outside the cluster E (Red Circled area).0 . Drop due to missing site Drop due to Poor Coverage Drop due to Lack Of dominance 11 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS  AERIAL OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY OPTIMIZATI ON PASS Cl us ter E E E E E E Azim uth 30 0 210 80 190 30 New Azim uth NA NA NA NA NA 20 ETilt 2 2 2 4 2 2 MTilt 0 0 0 0 0 2 New E-Tilt 4 7 4 2 0 NA New M-Tilt NA NA NA NA NA NA SITE POINTE ROUGE CC_BONNEVEINE MONTREDON MARSEILLEVEYRE MARSEILLEVEYRE LUMINY CellId 6181 15921 15322 17151 17152 4311 Sector 1 1 2 1 2 1 PSC 28 214 256 184 185 271 First First First First First First First Second LUMINY MARSEILLE LACADENELLE 4313 17181 E D 3 1 265 316 240 220 250 NA 2 6 0 0 NA 8 NA 2(UP)  6 Sites optimized / 18 total Sites  8 Sectors optimized / 42 total Sectors 12 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_05.OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS  NEIGHBORS AND PARAMETERS OPTIMIZATION CR Name PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_01.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_07.xls Total 3rd All 14 139 32 93  Parameters changes : Return to default settings 13 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_08.xls PCR_ClusterE_050504_2ndPass_02.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_02.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_06.0 .xls PCR_ClusterE_050504_2ndPass_03.xls Pass 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd Neigh Added 26 30 26 26 3 Neigh Deleted 6 2 6 6 2 Parameter Changed 32 23 11 27 6 8 4 6 PCR_ClusterE_180504_3rdPass_01.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_04.xls PCR_ClusterE_050504_2ndPass_01.xls PCR_ClusterE_290404_1stPass_03.

OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS  ISSUES LOGS  First Pass 19/4/2004 ALAR M 1M Ticket No.0 . SITENAME LA PLAGE DESCRIPTION CEM / 6 CCM-CEM link OPT TEAM COMMENTS Site Down. only before 10:30 loss of supervision power distribution problem Cross Feeder or Swapped PSC No Impact No Impact No Impact YES NO NO NO 33  Cross feeder Le Goudes. Impact on the Drive test Ticket NO LES GOUDES MARSEILLE VEYRE ROI D'ESPAGNE MICHELET 2M 1M 1C 1w TMA Malfunction Site temporary down. Ticket Number 33 of 30/4/2004 14 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

0 .OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS  ISSUES LOGS  Second Pass 3/5/2004 and 4/5/2004 Ticket No. Configuration File Inconsistent with the hardware power distribution problem OPT TEAM COMMENTS Only one Sector is installed but FDD Config is 2 Sector Ticket YES MICHELET MICHELET 1C 1m No Impact No Impact NO NO  Third Pass 10/5/2004 and 12/5/2004 SITENAME LES GOUDES MICHELET MICHELET ROI D'ESPAGNE ALARM 2M 1C 1m 1C DESCRIPTION TMA Malfunction Processing Error. Ticket YES NO NO NO Ticke t No. 33 SITENAME LES GOUDES ALARM 2M DESCRIPTION TMA Malfunction Processing Error. Configuration File Inconsistent with the hardware power distribution problem loss of supervision OPT TEAM COMMENTS No Impact No Impact No Impact Site did not transmit when CS long Call was done. 33 15 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

OPTIMIZATION ACTIONS  OPTIMIZATION DRIVE TEST  Total duration of DT in Cluster Optimization: 31h 5m 54s  Total duration of DT in Cluster Optimization: 5 Days 16 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CS VOICE LONG CALL  NETWORK STATUS DURING DRIVE-TEST SITENAME ROI D'ESPAGNE ALARM 1C DESCRIPTION loss of supervision OPTIMIZATION COMMENTS Site did not transmit when CSlong Call was done.0 . and the route was not re driven because it was a second drive (previous drive had some problems with the phone and the attenuator) and there was not more time according with the planning.  DT Duration: 5h 45m 45s 17 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.  This issue affected negatively the route around the site (many fails and drops).

CS VOICE LONG CALL  MAPS  UE Finger Dominant RSCP (Loaded) Circled in black.0 . areas with poor coverage Roi D’espagne problems 18 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

areas with poor coverage Roi D’espagne problems 19 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .CS VOICE LONG CALL  UE Finger Dominant Ec/Io (Loaded) Under loaded conditions one can see that the radio environment is much more degraded Circled in black.

areas with poor coverage Roi D’espagne problems 20 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.CS VOICE LONG CALL  UE TX Power (Loaded) Excluding the black circled areas. UEs have good Coverage in all cluster for Voice calls Circled in black.0 .

CS VOICE LONG CALL  Voice Call Event (Loaded) Drops and fails related to missing sites and poor coverage Roi D’espagne problems 21 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

4% 22 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .CS VOICE LONG CALL  UE Active Set Num Cell (Loaded) This slide shows that Softer Handover overhead=46.

CS VOICE LONG CALL  KPIs Call Duration during Drive Total Drop Calls Drop Calls Network Drop Calls Radio Drop Calls other 4h11m44s 34 15 18 1 Drop Calls Reasons 1 Release Unspicified 5 Roi D'espagne Fails 3 Lack of Dominance (by design or site roll over) 3 Missing active set update 1 Nlist Full and Optimized (Le frioul) 2 Missing Reference Cell Update 6 Missing neighbour (OCNS Activated) 4 Over Shooting (Sites without OCNS Activated) 5 Lack of Coverage 3 Lack of Dominance 1 Xcal bug: irrelevant drop Grey Drops are excluded from KPI calculation Service Drop Calls / hour BLER (%)  CS Voice Long Call 4.0 . NOTE: All The blocks and errors counts in Roi D’espagne area were excluded from the Bler Calculation 23 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1. Therefore KPI’s calculated above are more pessimistic than what they should be.87%  NOTE: exclusion zone was defined with RSCP level <-98dBm instead of -94dBm as insertion loss from attenuation box is close to 4dB.8 2.

4 06:08. SC173<->39 (Caused by Load Condition).0 57:15.7 10:49.3 10:24.CS VOICE LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Result Drop Fail Fail Drop Drop Fail Fail Drop Drop Fail Fail Drop Drop Fail Drop Fail Drop Drop Drop Drop Reason Missing Neighbour Lack of Dominance Lack of Dominance Lack of Coverage Missing Neighbour Missing Neighbour Missing Neighbour Missing Neighbour Active set update Active set update Lack of Dominance Lack of Dominance Start Time End Time 38:00.9 05:02.8 09:18. Overshooting from far away sites RSCP from Qualcomm very low.6 29:43.0 57:48.Fixed.0 57:37.8 10:01.5 11:01.5 13:05. Overshooting from far away sites Hilly area.8 06:20.0 12:43.3 09:39.5 57:27.3 15:40.1 28:45.9 05:14.5 57:58.0 03:52.Fixed. SC28<->39 (Caused by Load Condition). Fixed.4 04:41.5 12:32.5 58:10. SC28<->39 (Caused by Load Condition).3 09:06.8 09:49.0 11:11.2 10:35.9 04:31.1 15:29.8 28:34.4 04:52.0 11:22.6 04:04.4 Comments SC241<->SC125 and SC159<->SC125(Rabatau) Hilly area.5 12:53. No Scanner SC117<->56 (Caused by Load Condition). Missing site: PRADO Missing site: PRADO 24 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.1 04:19.3 09:28.3 19:48.8 19:37.Fixed.0 .

5 50:05.2 12:31.3 47:26.1 54:09.0 50:16.7 55:08. No Scanner RSCP from Qualcomm very low.7 31:06. No Scanner Overshooting from far away sites.2 55:18.5 49:55. Garibaldi SC316<->SC249 (caused by load condition).7 RSCP from Qualcomm very low.9 30:16. Overshooting SC215 and SC249 25 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.9 30:04.8 47:15.7 31:18.7 Lack of Coverage Lack of Coverage Lack of Coverage Lack of Coverage Lack of Dominance Missing Neighbour Overshooting 46:32.3 48:09.3 48:14.9 30:45. No Scanner RSCP from Qualcomm very low.4 44:23.2 30:56.6 52:13.1 52:02.8 47:05.4 46:43.Fixed.8 48:26.3 46:53.4 Release Unspicified 30:37.5 50:56.9 49:22.0 50:45.4 49:33.CS VOICE LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Result Fail Fail Drop Fail Result Unknown Result Unknown Drop Fail Fail Fail Fail Drop Drop Fail Fail Drop Drop Drop Drop Fail Reason Start Time End Time Comments 29:54.1 54:57.4 30:26.8 47:58.8 47:48. No Scanner RSCP from Qualcomm very low.0 .6 54:20.0 49:43.3 47:36.

5 23:39.7 26:32.3 Overshooting 55:51.0 22:34.6 32:21.2 Comments Overshooting SC249 Overshooting SC249 Missing site: PRADO Nlist Full:Le Froiul SC323 Roi D'espagne 21:51.0 23:50.5 Loss of supervision 22:13.0 .3 55:40.5 24:12.5 46:51.5 22:56.0 24:00.7 26:22.8 58:00.7 site fail 25:49.CS VOICE LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Result Fail Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Result Unknown Drop Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Drop Fail Fail Fail Reason Start Time End Time 55:30.8 56:07.3 Overshooting 56:18.1 Lack of Dominance 00:47.5 22:46.2 26:10.5 Nlist Full 32:33.5 24:22.5 25:39.0 22:24.0 33:23.1 Active set Update 33:34.0 25:27.2 26:00.0 Roi D'espagne 22:03.2 Reference Cell 58:11.0 23:17.6 46:39.0 24:33.7 00:36.2 26 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 23:07.5 23:29.

7 27:48.2 58:46.5 58:35.0 42:48.5 42:37.2 27:15.8 41:47.7 05:32.3 42:21.3 59:48.3 41:25.7 27:36.8 41:35.7 59:08.2 27:26.7 59:27.7 26:53.7 27:05.3 59:37.8 05:20.7 58:56.2 59:15.5 42:58.0 42:32.2 Comments Loss of supervision Loss of supervision Loss of supervision Overshooting SC242 27 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.2 41:14.0 .CS VOICE LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 Result Fail Fail Fail Drop Fail Drop Drop Fail Drop Fail Drop Fail Drop Result 74 Unknown Reason Roi D'espagne Roi D'espagne Roi D'espagne Reference Cell Overshooting Xcall Start Time End Time 26:43.

0 .  All Sites was working under normal conditions (exclude VLA and PA)  DT Duration: 5h 59m 38s 28 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.CSD LONG CALL  NETWORK STATUS DURING DRIVE-TEST  The drive test was not affected by any issue.

0 . areas with poor coverage 29 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.CSD LONG CALL MAPS  UE Finger Dominant RSCP (Loaded) Circled in black.

CSD LONG CALL  Scanner Top 1 RSCP (Loaded) 30 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CSD LONG CALL  Map with -98 dBm threshold for scanner Top1 measurement (Loaded) 31 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CSD LONG CALL  Map with -81 dBm threshold for scanner Top1 measurement (Loaded) 32 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

0 .CSD LONG CALL  UE Finger Dominant Ec/Io (Loaded) Under loaded conditions one can see that the radio environment is much more degraded Areas with coverage problems 33 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

0 . even if scanner shows better Ec/Io levels (Mobile is slightly more pessimistic). 34 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.CSD LONG CALL  Scanner Top 1 Ec/Io (Loaded) The scanner shows almost the same behavior as the mobile.

UE have good Coverage in all cluster for CSD calls Areas with problems Bad coverage area for CSD Calls.0 .CSD LONG CALL  UE TX Power (Loaded) Excluding the black circled areas. it will be fixed with Mazargues 35 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

CSD LONG CALL  Voice Call Event (Loaded) Drops related to missing sites or poor coverage 36 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CSD LONG CALL  UE Active Set Num Cell (Loaded) This slide shows that Softer Handover overhead=45.7% 37 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

5 0. 38 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .57% NOTE: exclusion zone was defined with RSCP level <-98dBm instead of -94dBm as insertion loss from attenuation box is close to 4dB. Therefore KPI’s calculated above are more pessimistic than what they should be.CSD LONG CALL  KPIs Call Duration during Drive Total Drop Calls Drop Calls Network Drop Calls Radio Drop Calls other 4h40m46s 27 9 15 3 Drop Calls Reasons 2 Excluded by RSCP <-98dBm 5 Realease Unspecified 1 Lack of Dominance (by design or site roll ove) 1 Missing active set update 4 Missing neighbour (OCNS Activated) 6 Over Shooting (Sites without OCNS Activated) 4 Poor Coverage 1 Lack of Dominance 3 Xcal bug: irrelevant drop Grey Drops are excluded from KPI calculation Service Drop Calls / hour BLER (%) CSD Long Call 4.

5 23:42.6 16:39.1 52:16.7 30:10.5 28:43.6 28:12. Fixed 15:37.0 27:36.6 Fixed sc117<->sc39 (Caused by Load 12:53.7 41:26.4 27:21.4 Can't be excluded by TOP1 RSCP by Design Overshooting from sites far away SC229 SC316 SC316 SC316 SC316 SC316 SC229 SC229 39 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 27:32.3 28:23.2 15:49.5 18:36.2 13:05.6 28:39.CSD LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No Result Result 1 Unknown 2 Call Drop 3 Call Drop 4 Call Drop 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Call Drop Drop Drop Drop Fail Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Fail Drop Drop Reason Start Time 14:55.4 03:29.3 16:51.2 28:58.0 11:59.1 27:17.8 18:24.4 41:07.4 27:05.4 30:22.0 .9 29:10.9 16:14.0 28:27.4 17:12. 11:47.5 16:26.1 28:54.6 Condition).0 41:19.1 17:24.7 27:48.1 23:54.3 sc28<->sc39 (Caused by Load Condition).3 End Time Comments RSCP<-98dBm Missing Neighbour Missing Neighbour Poor Coverage Lack of Dominance Lack of Dominance Overshooting Active set update XCAL Realease Unspecified Realease Unspecified XCAL Realease Unspecified Realease Unspecified Realease Unspecified Overshooting Overshooting 03:17.

9 sc63<->sc215 (Caused by Load Condition).5 41:04.3 SC249 Garibaldi 21:49.1 sc63<->sc215 (Caused by Load Condition). Fixed.6 41:29.7 04:16.2 14:39.9 can't be excluded by TOP1 RSCP but mobile is <-98dBm 41:18.1 End Time Comments RSCP<-98dBm overshooting overshooting overshooting XCAL Missing Neighbour Poor Coverage Poor Coverage Poor Coverage Missing Neighbour 09:47.CSD LONG CALL  Drop Calls Explanation No Result Result 21 Unknown 22 23 24 25 26 27 Call Call Call Call Call Call Drop Fail Drop Drop Drop Drop Reason Start Time 41:38.2 38:35.9 SC249 Garibaldi 19:32.2 16:47.0 .5 16:03.6 19:44. Fixed 28 Call Drop 29 Call Drop 30 Call Drop 31 Call Drop 32 Call Drop Result 33 Unknown Result 34 Unknown 40 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 can't be excluded by TOP1 RSCP but mobile is <-98dBm 44:36.7 44:47.7 SC249 Garibaldi 22:25.9 can't be excluded by TOP1 RSCP but mobile is <-98dBm 40:52. 39:44.4 22:37.5 16:35.6 38:23.5 39:56.9 15:51.7 14:51.0 22:01.

5 41 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .39% 10.CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  KPI SUMMARY CS Long Unloaded Loaded Service BLER % Ncoup BLER % Ncoup First Pass 3.46% 5.57% 4.90 Third Pass 2.07 Second Pass 2.87% 4.8 CSD Long Call Unloaded Loaded BLER % Ncoup BLER % Ncoup 0.

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  OUTSTANDING ACTIONS AND COMMENTS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE RESULTS Action Comment Since we have 3 Macro sites as VLA. the Cluster still needs aditional sites New Sites to improve overall coverage and Site dominance. As an example: Marseille integration Grande Bastille. Marseille David and Le Cabot. and Marseille ST Julien (Cluster B) were overshooting in areas with missing sites or poor coverage. Garibaldi (Cluster D). Overshooting Re design 42 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1. Is recommended a special study for the following sites: Le Frioul (Is overshooting everywhere) and Marseille La Cadenelle (the Configuration should be changed from 2 sectors with 65 degrees beamwith antennas to just one sector of 90 degrees Beamwith antenna. working on the Neighbour list Optimization is a necessity since it is a trade Nlist Optimization off between Overshooting and Coverage reduction St Loup UMTS (Cluster H).0 .

0 .CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE Dominant Ec/Io Distribution CS long (First Pass) 90% of the values are greater than -11dB 43 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE Dominant Ec/Io Distribution CS long (Second Pass) 90% of the values are greater than -11dB for pass 2 44 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE Dominant Ec/Io Distribution CS long(Third Pass) 74% of the values are greater than -11dB once network is 60% loaded 45 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE Dominant Ec/Io Distribution CSD long (Final) 75% of the values are greater than -11dB once network is 60% loaded 46 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

4% 47 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE ActiveSet Size Distribution CS Voice long (Final) This slide shows that Softer Handover overhead=46.

7% 48 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE ActiveSet Size Distribution CSD long (Final) This slide shows that Softer Handover overhead=45.0 .

0 .CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE BLER Distribution CS voice long (Final) 49 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.

CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  STATS  UE BLER Distribution CSD long (Final) 50 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.0 .

62% 12.61% 0.07% 34.CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  PARCELL RESULTS TABLE E Début optim : S10 (19/05/04) Surface du cluster (km²) 91.44% 66.5 22 dont 1 micro 21 macro / 51 sect Etat avant APRES optim optim 1ère CLUSTER passe APRES optim 2e passe APRES optim 3e passe APRES optim 4e passe APRES optim 5e passe Nombre initial de sites Nombre de sites et secteurs pris Caractéristiques en compte de Nbre de sites / secteurs modifiés l'environnement par rapport à l'état précédent Nbre total de sites / secteurs modifiés par rapport à l'état initial TCOUV UL Critères d'évaluation TCOUV Canal pilote zone de macro-diversité utile Pollution pilote Indicateur TARP 18 macro / 42 sect 18 macro / 42 sect 6 sites /8 secteurs 6 sites /8 secteurs 70.0 .58% 10.01% >= 85 % >= 85 % [10-20]% < 3% >= 85 % 70.80% 51 Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.56% 65.74% 0.01% 34.

61% POLLUTION PILOTE 0.01% CLUSTER E Cluster Optimisation Report Marseille Cluster E – v1.01% 34.62% MACRODIV UTILE 12.44% TARP 66.74% POLLUTION PILOTE 0.56% TARP 65.0 52 .CLUSTER OPTIMIZATION SUMMARY  PARCELL MAPS BEFORE AND AFTER OPTIMIZATION TCOUV UL 70.07% TCOUV PILOTE 34.80% OPTIM 3rd PASS TCOUV UL TCOUV PILOTE 70.58% MACRODIV UTILE 10.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful