You are on page 1of 21

PERFORMATIVE ACTS AND GENDER CONSTITUTION:

An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory


by Judith Butler, 1990

APPEARANCE OF BODY VS. REALITY OF GENDER


Lets take a look.
Our questions might be: - Is it a breast?? Or maybe not..? - Is he/she born as a female or as a male (his/her biological sex)? - Has he/she a vagina or a penis? - How can he/she has an intercourse? - Is it a he or a she?

What are we seeing? What is real? What is apparent? What is sex? What is gender?

1. WHAT IS GENDER?
Constitution of gender through performative acts.
GENDER= constitution of identity culturally and socially instituted through REPETITION OF STYLIZED ACTS through TIME. WHAT IS AN ACT? ACT= Bodily gestures, styles, movements (language as well) = stylized acts that must constantly be REPEATED.
The repetition itself produces a set of behaviors and reified forms which APPEARS as THE NATURAL CONFIGURATION OF BODIES (ontological core/original matrix of gender).

When we act and speak in a gendered way we are actively constituting it, replicating it, reinforcing it.

ACTS ARE CONSTITUTING ACTS (PERFORMATIVE)

- Acts constitute the individual identity of the actor, in order to be ACCOMPLISHMENT of the MODE OF BELIEF. - Performing them, the gendered way becomes PUBLIC and available. Our acts feed and maintain the ILLUSION of a core of a GENDERED SELF: we co-create the SOCIAL FICTION that this nature of gender exists.

Because of the performativity of the acts, GENDER come out and appears as the SUBSTANTIAL NATURAL SELF.

BUT
there is NO ESSENCE, NO PREXISTING IDENTITY, NO NATURALNESS that gender expresses or externalizes.

Gender norms build social cultural SUBJECTS as men and women Our ideas of what women and men are reflect nothing that exist in NATURE: our ideas derive from customs that embed social relations of POWER (shaped by forces that are social, rather then biological or natural)

The reality of being woman (or man) is not an empirical fact, but rather a performative effect of the language and the constituting acts that define her (or him). Sex is just made ontologically primary as a justification, the basis for the construction of the gendered identity.

2. BODY, GENDER, GENDERED BODY


Merleau-Ponty, Simone de Beauvior
Process of signification (GENDER)

BODY (nature)

The facticity of the natural dimensions of the body are conceived as DISTINCT from the process by which the body comes to bear cultural meanings. (NATURAL BODY PROCESS OF SIGNIFICATION) The artificiality of gender as radically INDIPENDENT from a NATURAL REALITY.

MerleauPonty Simone De Beauvior

BODY
(mode of enacting possibilities)

(through embodying/materializing ) (socialization/culture/imp osition of the cultural model of reference)

EMBODIED POSSIBILITIES WOMAN (GENDER as the cultural signification of the facticity of the body)

FEMALE
(SEX as the biological facticity)

The embodied possibilities as the gender are circumscribed by the HISTORICAL SITUATION. There is NOTHING PRE-DETERMINATED. The PROCESS OF SIGNIFICATION of the body is conditioned only by the historical convenctions (conforming the body in obedience to the historically delimitated possibilities and existing social directives).

3. WHO PLAY THE ACT?


Everyone
We enact the ES the particular actors who play it, but it REQUIRES individual actors in order to be actualized and reproduced as REALITY. Reality of gender with our bodies Acting we make the gender real.

But, the performance of gender is not an individual voluntary choice. GENDER AS A SCRIPT It SURVIV

The constitution of gender is always IN COMPLIANCE with the internalized regulations of gender identity. How? Why? There is a sort of TACIT AGREEMENT...

..why and how EVERYONE?


SOCIAL REGULATIONS AND GENDER NORMS:

GENDER AS STRATEGY OF SURVIVAL


Social sanctions and punitive consequences that regulated and coerced the subject performing stylized actions and roles, making us performe, produce and continue it.:

- When an individual ADHERE to the attributed normative models of gender and associated behaviors he/she is rewarded with selfdetermination, comfort and security of acting;

When an individual FAIL TO PERFORM the right illusion of gender essentialism dissonance; he/she is (socially) punished and marginalized.

GENDER
through the REPETITION OF PERFORMATIVE ACTS intervenes on

What we know about sex? Can we know sex as distinct from gender? If the body is only known through its gendered appearance (the cultural constructed significance that body assumes), what we know about the body?

BODY

modelling as

SEXED BODY
(articulated to reproductive heterosexuality)

Acts produce their own agents. Gendered acts produce gendered subjects that can generate them.

IDENTITY, GENDERED SUBJECT

RESUMING:
REALITY is constituted by the appearance of gender and its system of power and social mutual acknowledge;

GENDER = mechanism by which notions of masculine and feminine are naturalized; SUBJECTIVATION SUBJECTION - The price of existence as individual is the subordination; HUMAN NATURE is a manifestation of cultural meanings, social relations and power politics not biology, but CULTURE, becomes identity. The idea of an ESSENTIAL SEX constitutes a part of the strategy by which the gender is concealed; Society sets expected behaviors and roles that must be respected, performed and played if we want to survive (NORMATIVITY OF GENDER SYSTEM); Restricted SPACE and TIME: boarders and limits of existing directives;

DO YOU REMEMBER HE/SHE?


Lets take another look now. REMEMBER: the REALITY OF GENDER is constituted by the PERFORMANCE itself There is no model, no recourse to a authentic nature. There is NO TRUE OR FALSE, REAL OR DISTORTED ACTS OF GENDER. The truth or falsity of gender is only socially compelled and in no sense ontologically necessitated.

THE TRANSVESTITES GENDER IS REAL AS ANYONE WHOSE PERFORMANCE COMPLIES WITH SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS.

If every kind of gender can be real (through its performance), why are there only two?

5. BINARY GENDERS, HETEROSEXUAL CONTRACT


A human being enters the world not because of his/her ears or his/her nose, BUT as a MALE or a FEMALE, than by virtue of certain anatomical parts. Then, cultivation of the body into discrete sexes (SUBJECTION,= become a subject into the sex- gender-system GENDER IDENTITY). NATURAL binary opposition, NATURAL heterosexual matrix.

SEX, GENDER, HETEROSEXUALITY: EVERYTHING NATURAL.

...EVERYTHING NATURAL?

WHY TWO, RATHER THAN 3 OR 5, OR INDEFINITELY MANY?


Association of a NATURAL SEX with a GENDER and a NATURAL ATTRACTION to the opposing sex/gender CULTURAL CONSTRUCTS in the service of: - the REPRODUCTIVE INTERESTS (Foucault); - the reproduction of the SYSTEM OF KINSHIP. (G. Rubin, C. Levi-Strauss) The society NEEDS to define the anatomy in terms of binary because of the INTEREST OF REPRODUCTION of the KINSHIP system guaranteed only by SEXUAL REPRODUCTION based on heterosexuality.

SEX, GENDER, HETEROSEXUALITY = social constructs, historical products reified as natural by the gender-system.

Gender

Heterosexualit y

Heterosexuality is a construct produced and maintained through GENDER. Our continual repetition of such gender acts maintains the hegemony of the heteronormative standars.

If we dont submit to the gender-system and the categories through which we recognize ourself and we are recognized (gender= dynamics of identification and social acknowledgment; categories are signs of subordination and existence as well), are we out from the possibilities? Which possibilities we have?

GENDER= SYMBOLIC VIOLENCE It forces bodies into oppressive categories (binary system) that constrain desires and individual practice (heterosexuality) into possibilities already given.

How useful is a phenomenological point of departure for a feminist description of gender?


FEMINIST THEORY Womens perspective, battles against invisibility of women. Feminism speaks for the special interests of women. It considered the univocal category of women itself, in the name of emancipating a subjecting class (Foucault), an specificity, a singular shackled nature.

6. PHENOMENOLOGY AND FEMINISM

-How does the social reproduction of gender identities work? -How the phenomenon of mens or womens point of view get constituted? -Which are the mundane manners in which bodies get crafted into genders? -Conditions of oppression of the gender-system and the binary opposites categories that it create? These must be the points.
Feminism should extend the focus on a critical genealogy of the constructed categories new point of view over it, not only from the female perspective (appropriation of the phenomenological theory of constitution)

INVESTIGATING. CRITICIZING. OFFERING ALTERNATIVE DESCRIPTIONS AND PRESCRIPTIONS.

Concluding: what possibilities of changes?

Against a genealogy of gender as binary and heterosexual as natural, Butler demands instead for an understanding of gender as ..not passively scripted on the body, and neither is it determined by nature, language, the symbolic, or the overwhelming history of patriarchy. Gender needs to be costantly performated to be maintained. Because the gender identity is the repetition of acts through time, the possibilities of gender transformation are to be found IN THE RELATION BETWEEN SUCH ACTS, in the POSSIBILITY OF A DIFFERENT SORT OF REPEATING, in the BREAKING OR SUBVERSIVE REPETITION OF THAT STYLE. Gender itself is the SPACE OF ACTION to destabilize the normativity of gender itself. Transgressive subject, alternative acts that breaks the codes and the chain of the estabilished categories (symbolic risignification)

..Do we need another Antigone?