&
,
.
(2
, SMBG),
(HBA1c).
2/3 24
.
14%
12%
37%
(P<.0001)
(P<.0001)
(P=.04)
(P<.0001)
% of Patienten
18
<6.5%
32
<7.0%
48
61
<7.5%
<8.0%
HbA1c target
Rihl, Biermann, Standl: Diabetes & Stoffw. (2002)11:150-158
2 (HbA1c <7.0%)
100
P=0.002*
80
60
40
49.5
57.1
35.8
20
1999-2000
2001-2002
2003-2004
*P value was derived from multiple logistic regression models with HbA1c <7.0% as the outcome
variable. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, and survey were included as independent variables
2
A1c 8.5%
A1c>8.5%
( )
+ 1
&
+
MET +
MET +
A1c 2-3
A1c<8.5%
1.
, ,
,
2.
3.
A1C> 9%
()
DPP-4 GLP-1
SU GLIN
& + +
+ +/-
(
A1c 2-3
A1c>8.5%
& +
+ TZD + SU
MET + DPP-4 / GLP-1 + SU
MET + DPP-4 / GLP-1 + TZD
2-3
>7%
&
+ +
2011
DIABETES CARE,
VOLUME 35, JUNE
2012
1c 6,5-7,5%
HBA1c 7,6-9,5%
MONO
1 .
2 .,
., ., DPP4,
.,
+ 2
+ 2
.
2 +
3 +
Y
(, ,
, ?)
1..
) :
) - : -
) -: , DPP-4
) : , ?
2.
) - (3 ), - -
,
HbA1-c <7% (6,5%)
3.
4. ,
, ,
-
DPP-4
SGLT2
E, ,
, ,
,
XHMATIKO KOTO
3 2
SUs
TZDs
DPP-4/
GLP1
HbA1c
0.5-0.8%
1-2%
1-2%
/-
1-1.5% 0.5-1.5%
()
1-4
--0.5
+
+
-
+
-
2-10
3.6-5.3
()
+
-
1
-
QTc QTd
... ?
:
HbA1c
+ 2.0%
SU
GLINIDE
ROSI
PIO
AGI
DPP-4
GLP-1
METFORMIN
MONOTHERAPY
1.25
0.75
1.25
1.0
1.0
0.75
1.0
1.0
+ METFORMIN
0.8
0.7
1.0
1.0
0.7
0.8
1.0
-21
: M
: M
HbA1c<7%
53%
Kaplan-Meier event rate of progression to permanent Insulin use
0.25
N events:
0.20
3-year estimate:
placebo
362 / 1737
22.0%
pioglitazone
183 / 1741
11.1%
53%
0.15
0.10
0.05
pioglitazone
vs placebo
0.0
N at Risk: 3478
0
HR
95% CI
p value
0.469
0.392, 0.56
<0.0001
3346
3198
3075
2955
2824
12
18
24
30
446 (137)
36
PROactive:
HbA1c <7%
Actos+ Met
Met
6,8%
Actos+ SU
SU
6,9%
Hanefeld (n=250)
Charbonnel (n=317)
Chicago (n=232)
ADOPT (n=1,456)
Rosestock (n=115)
Tan (n=249)
Periscope (n=178)
RECORD (n=301)
PIO
Rosiglitazone
ROSI
PIO
-1
PIO
PIO
0
-2
5 studies in subjects with IGT demonstrated that TZDs prevent the
progression of IGT to Type 2 diabetes
(DREAM, ACT NOW, TRIPOD, PIPOD and DPT)
()
DeFronzo: Diabetes 2009; 58:
Risk ratios for composite end point of CVD hospitalizations or CVD mortality*
Source study reference
Relative risk
(95% CI)
Combination Control
therapy
group
Bruno (1999)
NS
NS
Olsson (2000)
NS
NS
Johnson (2005)
264/1081
541/2138
Koro (2005)
NS
NS
Evans (2006a)
133/1252
229/2286
Evans (2006b)
92/985
229/2286
Evans (2006c)
12/113
229/2286
Overall
0.25
SU combo with met
better than comparators
1.00
4.00
.
91.521 1990 2005
37% vs
37% vs
18%-30% (.
) vs
vs
24%-61% (.
) vs
41%
49% vs
(. )
J 2009;
339:b4731
24%-61%
(. ) vs
(General Practice
Research atabase).
.2,
2000-2010. 27.457
. 26.278 (95,7%) 1.000
.
(MACE)
HbA1c
12
*MACE, MI, Stroke, Cancer
10.0%
8.0%
-1,0%
0,1%
***
-1,0%
***
-0,7%
***
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
Sulf (n=1.348)
*** p<.001
(HR) (HR 1.459, p<0.001),
(MACE) (HR 1.578,
p<0.002), (HR 1.444, p<0.02) ,
(HR 1.381, p<0.003).
HbA1c ,
.
(NAFLD) (NASH)
: 50-80%
NASH:
NAFLD (): 20 gr /d (1
), C (-), (-)
20-30
: (20-30%
)
: 50-80%
( : 20-50%)
: 20%
NASH: ( 100%
!!!)
p<0.001
A
P = 0.002
0.73%
0.16%
41
C-reactive protein
(HDL, LDL, TG)
Plasminogen activator inhibitor1 (PAI-1) levels?
UKPDS
(
)
(
HDL, LDL, TG)
M
VSMC
PAI-1
( TNF-a, CRP,
etc.)
Rate of in-stent stenosis
postangioplasty
-
2
HbA1c
( BMI> 30)
(mg/dl)
-18,0 *
-18,0
28,8
*
-28,8
60 %
50
HbA1c
40
30
20
10
0
Pio+SU
Pio+MET
SU+MET
100
77%
(%)
80
60
54%
40
20
FDC
26%1*
FDC
2
FDC
(n=1815)
(n=105)
T2DM3
FDC= , T2DM= 2
1*P <0,001 .
.
1Bangalore S, et al. Am J Med 2007; 120: 713-719.
2Melikian C, et al. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 460-467.
3Blonde L, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2003; 5: 424-431.
30%2
HbA1c
0.5%2
(p<0.0001)
1618
.
%
( 1 )
86%
61%
49
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 11, 2009, 527533
.
,
(HDL, TRG, NAFLD )
() -
()
.
2010
50
38 ,, 26, HBa1c
8,1%, 135mg/dl SGOT/SGPT
30/64mg/dl, Gt 125mg/dl, Ht 45,8%, Chol
239mg/dl, TRG 209mg/dl, HDL 41mg/dl, LDL
117, 138/88mm/hg.
,
2/
( )
.
-
2/3 .
3 ( /)
.