You are on page 1of 28

1868 John Wesley Hyatt injection molds celluloid

billiard balls.
1872 John and Isaiah Hyatt patent the injection
molding machine.
1937 Society of the plastic industry founded.
1938 Dow invents polystyrene.
1940 World War II created huge demand for plastic
1941 Society of plastic engineering founded.
1942 Detrout Mold Engineering Inc (DME).
1955 General electric began marketing Polycarbonate.

1959 Du pont introduces actual homopolymer.
1969 Plastic land on the moon.
1972 The first part removal robot is installed on a molding
1980 Apple uses Acrylonitrite Butadiene styrene (ABS) in
Apple IIe computer.
1982 The JARVIK-7 plastic hearts keeps Barney Clark alive.
1985 Japanese firm introduces all electric molding
1988 Recycle of plastic comes to age.
1990 Aluminium molds introduces for production injection
1992 Melallocene Calalysts gave impressive properties to
1994 Cicinnate milacro sells first electronic machine in US.

Nypro is a plastics company. They operate 49 separate
businesses in 16 countries that design plastics products,
build moulds used to mold plastics, perform the plastics
injection molding.

Globally situated. In the North America there are 18
companies, 5 companies in Latin America, 6 companies
in Europe, 20 companies in Asia.

To become world class cost effective product
manufacture nylon and plastic product.

To serve our customers with integrated,
innovative and environmentally sound
manufacturing solutions.
Committed to satisfy of their customer
Establishing, documenting and maintaining a
quality management system in accordance
with the requirement of international
environmentally friendly manner creating
value for customer
Prevention of pollution and minimization of accidents by
adopting appropriate and safe manufacturing practices.
Comply with all applicable local/ regional and national
legal requirements.
Conserve natural resources by waste minimization,
reusing and recycling.
Continually improving the effectiveness of environment
and occupational health and safety management system
by revisiting objectives and targets and review its
continued suitability.
Communicate the policy to the interested parties, work
with them to promote/ educate on EHS.

Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS)
Original Design Manufacturers (ODM)
Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)
Design Firms
Nypro Forbes is collaborated business enterprise,
Nypro is an employed owned based company, Forbes
is TATA sister consultant. They are undertaking the
business through joint venture, 60% of the business
activities are of Nypro and 40% of the business
activities are of Forbes.

ISO 9001: 2000 design and manufacturer of plastic
injection moulds press tools and jugs and fixtures.
ISO/Ts 16949: 2002- manufacture of plastic injection
moulded components for automotive application
ISO14001: 2004 manufacturing and supply of plastic
injection moulded components, painted components and
related assemblies.
OHAS 18001:2007 (occupational health and safety
management system) manufacturing and supply of
plastic injection moulded components and related

Mother son group

T- Timely performance
Q- Quality at desired level
C-Cost effective
D-Delivery performance
S- Safety adherence
M- Managerial effectiveness.

Hard Elements

Soft Elements
Shared Values

Nypro's strategy is focused on providing integrated
and innovative plastics solutions to the world's
leading companies, implemented by the premier
global team of employees.
They are targeting strong, long-term growth by being
the supplier of choice to the best companies in the
Healthcare, Electronics, Telecommunications,
Industrial, Automotive, Packaging and Consumer
Shared Values & Core Beliefs
Believe in individual worth and integrity.
Team members deserve respect
Believe in respect and civility.
Ethical behaviour is at the root of all Nypro
decisions and actions.
recruitment system
performance appraisal system
information system
Program management
Product design and development
Mould design and fabrication
Metal fabrication
Injection moulding
Decoration and finishing technologies
Contract manufacturing

Total staff of Nypro Forbes is 208.
co-operative behaviour
o Precision Molding
o Tool making
o Multi-shot molding
o Stack molding
o Insert molding
o Injection blow molding
o Broad press range 50-750 tons
o Decorative painting
o High cavitations, fast cycle molding
o In-mold decoration
o Value added assembly
o Automated assembly
o Lean manufacturing philosophy
o Metal fabrication

lack of training
market expansion
competitor, supplier
According to Edwin B. Flippo Performance
appraisal is a systematic excellence in matters
pertaining to his present job and his potentialities for
the better job.
Individual evaluation method
Confidential report
Essay evaluation
Graphical rating scale
Management by objective
Behaviourally anchored rating scale
Forced choice method

Multi- person evaluation method
Ranking method
Paired comparison
Forced distribution

Other evaluation method
Group appraisal
Assessment centre
Field review
360 degree appraisal

According to Encyclopaedia of management,
motivation refer to the degree of readiness of an
organization to pursue some designated goals and
implies the determination of the nature and forces,
including the degree of readiness.

Positive motivation
Negative motivation

Inaccurate performance review+ increase in salary---
----decrease motivation
Performance review+ no increase in salary-------------
---decrease motivation
Accurate performance review+ increase in salary-----
---increase motivation

To analyze the ongoing performance appraisal
system in Nypro Forbes.
To assess the performance appraisal methods in
Nypro Forbes.
To evaluate the performance appraisal system to
Nypro Forbes towards selection, training, promotion,
transfer etc.
To evaluate the motivational aspect of performance
To suggest and recommend possible alternative, to
improve the performance appraisal system, if any.

From the survey it is found out that they are following
rating system for evaluating the performance of their
From the survey it is found out that 44% of the employees
in the company feel that performance appraisal system as
It is also found out that 48% of the employees of Nypro
Forbes feel that performance appraisal system is reliable.
It is found out that 88% of the employees of Nypro Forbes
actively participate in performance appraisal procedure.
Through the survey it is found out that Nypro Forbes
conduct performance appraisal annually.
Survey also reveals that 77% of the employees of Nypro
Forbes think that performance appraisal is free from bias.

Survey also indicated that 92% of the employees of Nypro
Forbes are ready to accept both positive and negative feedback
of performance appraisal.
Survey has also recognised that 23% of the employees of Nypro
Forbes are de-motivated through performance appraisal.
Survey has found out that 46% of the employees of Nypro
Forbes are good in taking initiatives at their work place.
46% of the employees of Nypro Forbes feel that the level of
motivation through performance appraisal is high.
71% of the employees of Nypro Forbes feel that they would be
motivated only when they are appreciated and give proper
compensation package for better performance.
56% of the employees of Nypro Forbes feel like bringing change
in performance appraisal system.

Performance appraisal should be carried on half yearly to evaluate the
employees performance regularly and to correct them if any deviation.
Company should use 360 degree performance appraisal system since it helps to
take entire organizations opinion in evaluating employees performance.
Since only 88% of the employees are participative in nature, the remaining
12% of them should be given any task which would bring out their
participative nature in their work.
The company should conduct counselling to know their problems which are
preventing their performance; this will help them to perform better in the work
The company to recognise the better performance of the employees by
appreciating and providing monetary benefits like incentives, and
compensation package.
The company to give more freedom to the employees to express their opinion.
Only 46% of the employees are good in taking initiatives at their work place.
The remaining 54% of the employees should be given with appropriate
opportunities to take initiatives and risk at their work place.