You are on page 1of 36

# Theoretical Physics

## Course codes: Phys2325/Phys3150

Course Homepage: http://bohr.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/
Lecturer: Z.D.Wang,
Office: Rm528, Physics Building
Tel:
2859 1961
E-mail: zwang@hku.hk
Student Consultation hours: 3:00-5:00pm Monday
Tutor: Mr. Xianjia HUANG, Rm525

## Text Book: Lecture Notes Selected from

Mathematical Methods for Physicists
International Edition (4th or 5th or 6th Edition)
by
George B. Arfken and Hans J. Weber
Application of complex variables,
e.g. Cauchy's integral formula, calculus of residues.
Partial differential equations.
Properties of special functions
(e.g. Gamma functions, Bessel functions, etc.).
Fourier Series.
Assessment:
One 3-hour written examination (70% weighting)
and course assessment (30% weighting)
2

## 1 Functions of A Complex Variables I

Functions of a complex variable provide us some powerful and
widely useful tools in in theoretical physics.
Some important physical quantities are complex variables (the
wave-function )
Evaluating definite integrals.
Obtaining asymptotic solutions of differentials
equations.
Integral transforms
Many Physical quantities that were originally real become complex
0
as simple theory is made more general. The energy En En i
( 1 / the finite life time).

## 1.1 Complex Algebra

We here go through the complex algebra briefly.
A complex number z = (x,y) = x + iy, Where. i 1
We will see that the ordering of two real numbers (x,y) is significant,
i.e. in general x + iy y + ix
X: the real part, labeled by Re(z); y: the imaginary part, labeled by Im(z)
Three frequently used representations:
(1) Cartesian representation: x+iy

## (2) polar representation, we may write

z=r(cos + i sin) or z r e i
r the modulus or magnitude of z
- the argument or phase of z
4

## r the modulus or magnitude of z

- the argument or phase of z

r z x y
2

## The relation between Cartesian

and polar representation:

1/ 2

tan 1 y / x

## The choice of polar representation or Cartesian representation is a

matter of convenience. Addition and subtraction of complex variables
are easier in the Cartesian representation. Multiplication, division,
powers, roots are easier to handle in polar form,

z1 z 2 ( x1 x2 ) i ( y1 y2 )
z1 z 2 ( x1 x2 y1 y2 ) i ( x1 y2 x2 y2 )
z1 z 2 r1 r2 e i 1 2
z / z r / r e i 1 2
1

z n r n e in
5

## Using the polar form,

z1 z 2 z1 z 2
arg( z1 z 2 ) arg( z1 ) arg( z 2 )

## From z, complex functions f(z) may be constructed. They

can be written
f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y)
in which v and u are real functions.
For example if f ( z ) z 2 , we have

f z x 2 y 2 i 2 xy
The relationship between z and f(z) is best pictured as a
mapping operation, we address it in detail later.
6

Z-plane

## The function w(x,y)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y) maps points in the xy plane into points

in the uv plane.
Since

e i cos i sin
e in (cos i sin ) n

7

*

z x iy

We then have

zz * x 2 y 2 r 2

Hence

z zz

* 12

Note:

z re i

## Special features: single-valued function of a

real variable ---- multi-valued function

rei 2n

ln z ln r i

ln z ln r i 2n

## ln z is a multi-valued function. To avoid ambiguity, we usually set n=0

and limit the phase to an interval of length of 2. The value of lnz with
n=0 is called the principal value of lnz.
8

Another possibility
| sin x |, | cos x | 1 for a real x;
however, possibly | sin z |, | cos z | 1 and even
Question:

## Using the identities :

eiz e iz
eiz e iz
cosz
; sinz
2
2i
to show (a) sin( x iy ) sinx cosh y i cos x sinh y
cos( x iy ) cos x cosh y i sin x sinh y
(b) | sinz |2 sin 2 x sinh 2 y
| cosz |2 cos 2 x sinh 2 y

## 1.2 Cauchy Riemann conditions

Having established complex functions, we now proceed to
differentiate them. The derivative of f(z), like that of a real function, is
defined by
f z z f z
f z df
lim

f z
z 0
z 0 z
z
dz
provided that the limit is independent of the particular approach to the
lim f x lim f x f x o
point z. For real variable, we require that x
xo
x xo
Now, with z (or zo) some point in a plane, our requirement that the
limit be independent of the direction of approach is very restrictive.
lim

Consider

z x iy
f u i v
f
u i v

z x i y

10

Let us take limit by the two different approaches as in the figure. First,
with y = 0, we let x0,

f
v
u
lim
i
z 0 z x 0 x
x
u
v

i
x
x
lim

## Assuming the partial derivatives, exist. For a second approach, we set

x = 0 and then let y 0. This leads to

f
u v
lim
i

z 0 z
y y

## If we have a derivative, the above two results must be identical. So,

u
v

x
y

u
v

y
x
11

These are the famous Cauchy-Riemann conditions. These CauchyRiemann conditions are necessary for the existence of a derivative,
that
f x
is, if
exists, the C-R conditions must hold.
Conversely, if the C-R conditions are satisfied and
f z the partial
derivatives of u(x,y) and v(x,y) are continuous,
exists. (see the proof
in the text book).

12

Analytic functions
If f(z) is differentiable at z z0 and in some small region around z0 ,
we say that f(z) is analytic at z z0
Differentiable: Cauthy-Riemann conditions are satisfied
the partial derivatives of u and v are continuous
Analytic function:
Property 1:

2u 2 v 0

Example:

## Find the analytic functions w( z ) u ( x, y ) iv( x, y )

if (a) u ( x, y ) x 3 3 xy 2
(b) v( x, y ) e y sin x

13

## 1.3 Cauchys integral Theorem

We now turn to integration.
in close analogy to the integral of a real function
'
n
z

z
The contour 0
0 is divided into n intervals .Let
wiith z j z j z j 1 0
for j. Then
n

z0

j 1

z0

f j z j f z dz

n
lim

## provided that the limit exists and is

independent of the details of
choosing the points z j and j ,
where j is a point on the curve bewteen
z j and z j 1.

The right-hand side of the above equation is called the contour (path)
14
integral of f(z)

## As an alternative, the contour may be defined by

z2

x2 y2

c z1

c x1 y1
x2 y2

f z dz u x, y iv x, y dx idy

x2 y2

## x y udx vdy i xy vdx udy

1 1

1 1

with the path C specified. This reduces the complex integral to the
complex sum of real integrals. Its somewhat analogous to the case of
the vector integral.

An important example

z n dz

c
where C is a circle of radius r>0 around the origin z=0 in
the direction of counterclockwise.
15

## In polar coordinates, we parameterize

i
and dz ire d , and have

1
2i

z re i

n 1 2

r
z dz
2
n

0
{
1

expi n 1 d
0

for n -1
for n - 1

which is independent of r.
Cauchys integral theorem
If a function f(z) is analytical (therefore single-valued) [and its
partial derivatives are continuous] through some simply connected
region R, for every closed path C in R,

f z dz 0
c

16

## Stokess theorem proof

Proof: (under relatively restrictive condition: the partial derivative of u, v
are continuous, which are actually not required but usually
satisfied in physical problems)

c

## These two line integrals can be converted to surface integrals by

Stokess theorem

A dl A d s
c

A
x

A
y
ds

dxdy
z
Using
and
x
y
We have

Ax dx Ay dy A d l A d s
c

A y A x
dxdy

y
x

17

## For the real part, If we let u = Ax, and v = -Ay, then

v u
udx vdy dxdy
x y

v
u

y
[since C-R conditions x

=0
]
For the imaginary part, setting u = Ay and v = Ax, we have
vdx udy u v dxdy 0
x y

f z dz 0

As for a proof without using the continuity condition, see the text book.
The consequence of the theorem is that for analytic functions the line
integral is a function only of its end points, independent of the path of
integration,
z2

z1

z1

z2

f z dz F z 2 F z1 f z dz
18

## Multiply connected regions

The original statement of our theorem demanded a simply connected
region. This restriction may easily be relaxed by the creation of a
barrier, a contour line. Consider the multiply connected region of
Fig.1.6 In which f(z) is not defined for the interior R

1.6 Fig.

Cauchys integral theorem is not valid for the contour C, but we can
construct a C for which the theorem holds. If line segments DE and
GA arbitrarily close together, then
A

f z dz

f z dz

19

f z dz

C
ABDEFGA

ABD

EFG

ABD

DE

GA

f z dz

EFG

f z dz 0

f z dz f z dz

C1

ABD C1'

C2

EFG C2'

20

## 1.4 Cauchys Integral Formula

Cauchys integral formula: If f(z) is analytic on and within a closed
contour C then
f z dz
2if z 0
z z0

## in which z0 is some point in the interior region bounded by C. Note that

here z-z0 0 and the integral is well defined.
Although f(z) is assumed analytic, the integrand (f(z)/z-z 0) is not
analytic at z=z0 unless f(z0)=0. If the contour is deformed as in Fig.1.8
Cauchys integral theorem applies.
So we have

f z dz

z z0

C2

f z
dz 0
z z0
21

approach zero

C2

f z dz
dz
z z0

(r0)

C2

f z 0 re i
re i

rie d
i

if z 0 d 2if z 0
C2

## Here is a remarkable result. The value of an analytic function is given at

an interior point at z=z0 once the values on the boundary C are
specified.
What happens if z0 is exterior to C?
In this case the entire integral is analytic on and within C, so the
integral vanishes.
22

1
2i

f z dz f z 0 ,

z z0
0,

z 0 interior
z 0 exterior

Derivatives
Cauchys integral formula may be used to obtain an expression for
the derivation of f(z)

f z0

dz0
1

2i

f z dz
1

i
z

z
0

d
f z dz
dz 0

1
z z0

1
2i

f z dz

z z0 2

## Moreover, for the n-th order of derivative

n!

n
f z0
2i

f z dz

z z 0 n1
23

We now see that, the requirement that f(z) be analytic not only
guarantees a first derivative but derivatives of all orders as well! The
derivatives of f(z) are automatically analytic. Here, it is worth to
indicate that the converse of Cauchys integral theorem holds as well

Moreras theorem:
If a function f(z) is continuous in a simply connected region R
and f ( z )dz 0 for every closed C within R, then f(z) is
C

## analytic throught R (see the text book).

24

Examples
1. If f ( z ) a n z n is analytic on and within
n0

f j z j! a j

a n z n j

n j 1

f j 0 j! a j
f n 0
1
an

n!
2i

f z dz
z n 1

25

## 2.In the above case, f z M on a circle of radius r about the origin,

then a n r n M (Cauchys inequality)
Proof:
an

where

1
2

f z dz

z r

z n 1

M r

2r
2r n 1

M
rn

M r Max z r f r

## 3. Liouvilles theorem: If f(z) is analytic and bounded in the complex

plane, it is a constant.
Proof: For any z0, construct a circle of radius R around z 0,
f z 0

1
2i

f z dz

z z0 2
R

M 2R
2 R 2

R
26

## Since R is arbitrary, let R , we have

f z 0, i.e, f ( z ) const.
Conversely, the slightest deviation of an analytic function from a
constant value implies that there must be at least one singularity
somewhere in the infinite complex plane. Apart from the trivial constant
functions, then, singularities are a fact of life, and we must learn to live
with them, and to use them further.

27

## 1.5 Laurent Expansion

Taylor Expansion

f
z

a
z

n
0
Suppose we are trying to expand f(z) about z=z0, i.e.,
n 0
and we have z=z1 as the nearest point for which f(z) is not analytic. We
construct a circle C centered at z=z0 with radius z z 0 z1 z 0

## From the Cauchy integral formula,

f z

1 f z dz
1
f z dz

2i C z z
2i C z z 0 z z 0

1
f z dz
2i C z z 0 1 z z 0 z z 0
28

## Here z is a point on C and z is any point interior to C. For |t| <1, we

note the identity
1
1 t t2
1 t

tn

n 0

So we may write
1
f z
2i
1

2i

z z 0 n f z dz

z 0 n 1

z
n

0
C

z z0 n

n 0

n 1

z
0
C

n 0

z z0

f z dz

f n z0
n!

which is our desired Taylor expansion, just as for real variable power
series, this expansion is unique for a given z0.
29

## Schwarz reflection principle

n

g
z

x
From the binomial expansion of
for integer n (as an
0
assignment), it is easy to see, for real x0

g z z x 0
*

n *

x0

g z*

## Schwarz reflection principle:

If a function f(z) is (1) analytic over some region including the real axis
and (2) real when z is real, then
f * z f z*

We expand f(z) about some point (nonsingular) point x0 on the real axis
because f(z) is analytic at z=x0.

n x
n f
0
z x0
f z
n!
n 0

Since f(z) is real when z is real, the n-th derivate must be real.
f

z z
n 0

x0

f n x0
f z*
n!

30

Laurent Series
We frequently encounter functions that are analytic in
annular region

31

## Drawing an imaginary contour line to convert our region into a simply

connected region, we apply Cauchys integral formula for C 2 and C1,
with radii r2 and r1, and obtain

1
f z
2i

C1

C2

f z dz
z z

## We let r2 r and r1 R, so for C1, z z 0 z z 0 while for C2,

We expand two denominators as we did before

1
f z

2i

C1

f z dz

z z 0 1 z z 0 z z 0

1
z z0 n

2i n0

f z

f z dz

z z0 n1

C1

an z z0 n

C2

f z dz

z z 0 1 z z 0 z z 0

1
1

2i n0 z z 0 n1

z z 0 z z.0

z z0

f z dz

C2

(Laurent Series)

32

where
an

2i

f z dz

z z 0 n1

Here C may be any contour with the annular region r < |zz0| < R encircling z0 once in a counterclockwise sense.
Laurent Series need not to come from evaluation of contour
integrals. Other techniques such as ordinary series
expansion may provide the coefficients.
Numerous examples of Laurent series appear in the next
chapter.

33

Example:
(1) Find Taylor expansion ln(1+z) at point z
(2) find Laurent series of the function

1
an
2i

z n1

dz
1

z z 1 2i

ln(1 z ) (1)
n 1

f z z z 1

m0

z m

n 1

zn
n

dz

z n2

## If we employ the polar form

1
rie i d
an
2i m 0 r n 2 m e i n 2m

2i
n 2 m,1
2i
m 0

1
0

an

## The Laurent expansion becomes

for n -1
for n - 1

1
1
1 z z2 z3 zn
z z 1
z
n 1

34

Analytic continuation
f z 1 1 z

For example

## which has a simple pole at z = -1 and is analytic

elsewhere. For |z| < 1, the geometric series expansion f1,
1
f ( z)
;
1 z

f1 ( z ) ;
n 0

1 z i
f2

1 i n 0 z i

35

1
1 z z2
1 z

n 0

## Suppose we expand it about z = i, so that

f z

1
1

1 i z i 1 i 1 z i 1 i

1 i

zi
z i
1

1 i
1 i 2

converges for

z i 1 i 2 (Fig.1.10)

## The above three equations are different representations of the same

function. Each representation has its own domain of convergence.
A beautiful theory:
If two analytic functions coincide in any region, such as the overlap of s1 and s2,
of coincide on any line segment, they are the same function in the sense that they
36
will coincide everywhere as long as they are well-defined.