Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bituminous
Aggregate- Selection of quarry based on aggregate impact value & water absorption.
- Manufacturing of aggregate in such a manner so that its meets physical requirement of respective
construction
- Starting the aggregate of different sizes separately.
- Obtaining the sample from sizes and the test needed to establishment physical requirement.
- Do the, blending so as to obtain the desired grading.
- How to control fraction and gradation.
Mix Design
I Ascertain the specific gravity & water absorption of each component of blends. In case of binder & fitter
apartment specific gravity will be needed.
Aggregate Grading :- It can be projected that single size stone will contain about 35 PC of voids, adding
sand to it will fill these voids and reduce their value until so much sand is added that it pushes stone apart
and causes the void content to rise again. It is experienced 75% of stone content will have lowest void
content. It is also argued that careful mix design and mechanical testing is per haps not essential when
applied to road mixes. However control over the voids in the mix is essential in order to produce the mixes
that are durable and would not fat under modern heavy traffic condition. Mixes of different type of
aggregate of identical grading may well have very different void contents and hence although one
particular grading may give the test mix with one set of aggregate when using a different set of aggregate
a variation in grading/ bitumen content may be required. It is experienced that the void content in the
mixed aggregate is controlled to between 16-19% give most satisfactory mixes.
Specific Gravity of mixed aggregate
W I = % use of A
W 2, W 3, W 4, W 5 = B, C, D, E P.C. use
100
S.G.M.A =
WI + W2 + W3 + W4 + W5
G I G2 G 3
G4 G5
20100
+ 30 + 30 + 10 + 10
100
37.63
SGMA CDMA
= 2.65
C.D.M.A:- Compacting in Marshal mould, in three layer, each layer being given 25 blows with
Marshal however in proctor mould 4 layer each layer given 20 blows with proctor hammer.
Assessment 2.17
SGMA CDMA
VMA =
X 100
SGMA
= 2.65 2.17 X 100 = 18%
2.65
In dry mix 17-20% will obtain 16-19 PC, in final mix
Voids in mixed aggregate (V.M.A)
VMA =
SGMA-CDMA
SGMA
2.65 2.17
=
X 100
X 100 = 18 PC
2.65
=
=
2.17
= 6.8 P.C.
Specific gravity of mix S.G.M.
100+6.8
S.G.M.A =
100 + 6.8
2.65 1.04
=
106.8
44.31
2.41
P.C. of Each
Sample on
dry
aggregate
P.C. of
Each
Sample
on total
mix
Material By WT
(Kg)
Materials By
Volume M3
Remarks
Sample No.2
25%
23.8%
346.977
0.221
Sample No.3
25%
23.8%
346.977
0.224
Most
4th Revision
Sample No.5
30%
28.56%
416.373
0.268
Sample No.6,
Dust
18%
17.14%
249.823
0.144
Cement
2%
2%
27.758
27.758 Kg
60/70 Grade
Bitumen
5.05%
4.80%
70.089
70.089 Kg
Sample No.
Note : Manufacturing, Spreading & Rolling temperature will be according to table 500 5 of Specification for Road
Bridge work.
All tests have been conducted as per relevant IS codes.
ALL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF AGGREGATES AND BITUMEN ARE AS FOLLOWS:Grain size analysis : Coarse aggr. Do not contain materials passing more then 5% in 0.075
mm IS sieve
Individual grading of the aggregate :
P.C. by weight of Dry Aggr. Passing in I.S. Sive
I.S. Sieve
(mm)
37.
5
26.
5
19.
0
13.
2
Sample No.1
90
29
Sample No.2
100
100
44
Sample No.3
100
100
Sample No.4
100
Sample No.5
Sample No.6
(Dust)
9.5
4.7
5
2.3
6
100
34
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
.600
.
30
0
.
150
.075
90
25
100
100
60
35
18
100
100
100
100
99
86
64
34
18
Sample No.7
100 100 100 100
100
100 100
100
100
Following tests conducted on resultant materials of aggregate
90
85
75
NAME OF TESTS
1.18
D.B.M.
28.91
22.16
0.584
Specific Gravity
Sample 1
2.761
1580
Sample 2
2.760
1565
Sample 3
2.750
1545
Sample 4
2.750
1555
Sample 5
2.745
1550
Sample 6 (Dust)
2.700
1725
Sample 7 (Cement)
3.12
Name of Test
1.
2.
3.
Softening point in 0C
4.
Paving
Bitumen
PMB -70
CRMB
67
57
42
More than
100
>100
30
47
52
57
52
60
The results obtained satisfy the requirement of S 65 (60/70) Grade Bitumen as per I.S. code.
S.
No
3
S.
No
5
S.
No
6
(Dus
t)
Cem
ent
S. No.
2
S. No
3
S. No
5
S. No
6
(Dust)
Cem
ent
25%
25%
30%
18%
2%
Combined
Grading
Specifi
cation
37.5
100
100
100
100
100
25
25
30
18
100
100
26.5
100
100
100
100
100
25
25
30
18
100
90-100
19.0
44
100
100
100
100
11
25
30
18
86
71-95
13.2
34
100
100
100
8.5
30
18
59
56-80
4.75
60
100
100
.50
18.0
18
39
38-54
2.36
35
100
100
10.5
18
31
28-42
.300
64
90
11.52
1.8
15
7-21
.075
18
75
3.24
1.5
2-8
MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND MEASURED BULK DENSITY OF COMPACTED MIX AT
DIFFERENT P.C. OF BINDER FOR D.B.M
P.C. BINDER
ON TOTAL
MIX
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY
OF MIX
BULK
DENSITY
(GM / CC)
Stability
in Kg
Flow
in
MM
VIM
VMA
VFB
4.272
4.097
2.564
2.411
1128
2.25
5.967
15.844
62.339
4.727
4.513
2.547
2.426
1158
2.65
4.750
15.698
69.741
5.272
5.008
2.527
2.431
1219
3.05
3.798
15.972
76.220
5.818
5.498
2.507
2.411
1148
3.50
3.829
17.084
77.587
P.C.
BINDER
ON DRY
AGGR
OPTIMUM BINDER CONTENT IS DETERMINED FROM THE AVERAGE OF THE FOLLOWING DATA, TAKEN FROM GRAPH FOR D.B.M
(I) Binder content at maximum stability
= 5.00
(II) Binder contact at maximum unit wt. of mix.
= 5.15
(III) Binder content at Minimum air voids
= 5.0
(IV) Optimum binder content on dry aggr.
= 5.05
(V) Optimum binder content on total mix
= 4.80
(VI) Maximum bulk density (gm/cc)
= 2.43
Following Test Results are obtained from optimum binder content and verified with Road & Bridge works specification (Fourth Revision) :
Results Obtained
As per Specification
Stability in Kg.
1219
>900
Flow in mm
3.05
2-4
VIM%
4.142
3-6
VMA%
15.806
>15.00
VFB%
73.794
65-75
Test
P.C. of Each
Sample on
dry
aggregate
P.C. of
Each
Sample
on total
mix
Material By WT
(Kg)
Materials By
Volume M3
Sample No.2
25%
23.8%
346.977
0.221
Sample No.3
25%
23.8%
346.977
0.224
Sample No.5
30%
28.56%
416.373
0.268
Sample No.6,
Dust
18%
17.14%
249.823
0.144
Cement
2%
2%
27.758
27.758 Kg
60/70 Grade
Bitumen
5.05%
4.80%
70.089
70.089 Kg
Sample No.
Remarks
Most
4th Revision
Sample No.
Sample No.3
P.C. of Each
Sample on
dry
aggregate
P.C. of
Each
Sample
on total
mix
Material By WT
(Kg)
Materials By
Volume M3
Remarks
40%
38.60%
667.277
0.431
Most
4 Revision
th
Sample No.4
30%
28.95%
500.458
0.321
Sample No.5
25%
24.13%
417.048
0.269
Sample No.6
Dust
5%
4.83%
83.409
0.048
5.63%
3.50%
60.555
60.555 Kg
60/70 Grade
Bitumen
Note : Manufacturing, Spreading & Rolling temperature will be according to table 500 5 of
Specification for Road Bridge work.
All tests have been conducted as per relevant IS codes.
I.S.
Siev
e
mm
Sample 3
26.5
100
100
100
19.0
100
100
13.2
34
4.75
Sample 4
Sample 5
Sample 6
Sample 6
Combin
ed
Grading
Specific
ation
Sample
3
Sample
4
40%
30%
25%
5%
100
40
30
25
100
100
100
100
40
30
25
100
90-100
100
100
100
13.6
30
25
74
56-88
25
60
100
0.8
7.5
15
28
16-36
2.36
35
100
2.4
8.75
16
4-19
0.30
0
64
3.2
2-10
0.07
5
18
0.9
1
0-8
MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND MEASURED BULK DENSITY OF
COMPACTED MIX AT DIFFERENT P.C. OF BINDER FOR B.M
P.C. BINDER ON
TOTAL MIX
SPECIFIC
GRAVITY OF MIX
BULK DENSITY
(GM / CC)
3.454
3.339
2.595
2.285
3.636
3.508
2.587
2.305
3.818
3.677
2.580
2.290
MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND MEASURED BULK DENSITY OF COMPACTED MIX
DIFFERENT P.C. OF BINDER FOR B.M.
(a)Optimum binder content on dry aggr.
= 3.630
(b)Optimum binder contant on total mix
= 3.50
(c)Maximum bulk density (gm/cc)
= 2.305
JOB MIX FORMULA FOR BM (75MM) FOR 10 M2 AREA
Qnty per 102
=10 x 0.075 m3=0.75 m3
Weight
=1728.750 Kg=1.728 MT
COMPUTATION OF MATERIALS FOR 10M2 AREA OF 75 MM COMPACTED THICKNESS B.M.
P.C. of
Each
Sample on
dry
aggregate
P.C. of
Each
Sample
on total
mix
Material By
WT (Kg)
Materials By
Volume M3
Sample No.3
40%
38.60%
667.277
0.431
Sample No.4
30%
28.95%
500.458
0.321
Sample No.
Sample No.5
25%
24.13%
417.048
0.269
Sample No.6
Dust
5%
4.83%
83.409
0.048
5.63%
3.50%
60.555
60.555 Kg
60/70 Grade
Bitumen
Remarks
Most
4 Revision
th
Note : (a)Marshall stability and Flow Value are not included here.
b)All tables mentioned in the report relate to specification for Road &
Bridge Works.
c) All tests have been conduct according to relevant codes.
d) Manufacturing rolling temperature would be according to table 500 5 of specification for Road & Bridge
Works (Fourth Revision)
DBM
6
=5.00
=5.00
5
Air Void P.C
4
=5.05
= 4.80
1200
1
1150
2.43
Stability, kg
2.42
1100
2.41
4.1
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
4.1
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
PC
BIN
DE
R
ON
TOT
AL
MIX
WT.
OF
SPECI
MEN
IN AIR
GM.
WT. OF
SPECIME
N IN
WATER,
GM.
VOLU
ME OF
SPECI
MEN
CC
BULK
DENSIT
Y gm/cc
WT.SPECI
MEN NITH
WAX
COATID IN
AIR GM
SPECI
FIC
GRAVI
TY OF
MIX
4.272
4.09
7
1143
671
472
2.421
1143
667
476
2.401
STABILITY IN KG
4.51
3
679
474
2.432
1148
674
474
2.421
5.00
8
CORR
ECTE
D
STABI
LITY
DIAL
GAUG
E
READI
NG
IN
M.M.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2.564
380
1016
1.14
1158
200
2.0
5.9
67
15.84
4
62.33
9
360
963
1.14
1097
250
2.5
4.7
50
15.69
8
69.74
1
3.7
98
15.97
2
76.22
0
3.8
29
17.08
4
77.58
7
2.547
380
1016
1.14
1158
250
2.5
380
1016
1.14
1158
280
2.8
680
474
2.434
1154
679
475
2.429
2.527
5.49
8
1070
1.14
1219
310
3.1
400
1070
1.14
1219
300
3.0
AVERAGE = 1219
1160
677
483
2.401
1160
681
479
2.421
AVERAGE = 2.411
AV. = 2.65
400
AVERAGE = 2.431
5.818
AV.2.25
AVERAGE = 1158
1154
VFB
COR
RECT
ED
FACT
OR
AVERAGE = 2.426
5.272
VMA
IN
KG
AVERAGE = 1128
1153
VI
M
DIAL
GAUG
E
READI
NG
AVERAGE = 2.411
4.727
FLOW IN MM
2.507
AV. =3.05
390
1043
1.09
1137
340
3.4
380
1016
1.14
1158
360
3.6
AVERAGE = 1148
AV. =3.5