Process

Assessment:
Criteria and
tools.
INTERVENTION IN PSYCHOSOCIAL
PROBLEMS

DEFINITION OF EVALUATION
Is a function that consists in making such an
appreciation systematic and objective as possible
assessment of a project [to be realized] in progress or
completed, a program or a set of action lines, its design,
implementation and results

THE RELEVANCE
OF THEIR
OBJECTIVES
IMPACT
THEIR
FULFILLMENT

EFFICIENCY IN
TERMS OF SOCIAL
ACTION
TO
DETERMINE

VIABILITY
EFFECTIVENESS

Evaluation of process
1

Evaluation of the planning of a program or project

It involves the investigation or assessment of all aspects
directly linked to the process of defining, developing and
establishing the initial viability.
The evaluation is useful at this stage to correct the design and
formulation of the project or program, reorient and estimate the
feasibility of the implementation.
This evaluation answers to the questions relative to the internal
coherence of the design and the viability to execute the
activities foreseen for the generation of results and impacts.

Evaluation of the execution of a program or project

it implies the investigation and valuation on how there are
executed the actions of the program or project, all his
components, tasks, resources, budget, etc..
The objective of this evaluation is it to guarantee the permanent
information about this execution that feeds this way the capture
of decisions with regard to the efficiency of the foreseen
resources and the efficiency of the developed activities.
In this stage it is necessary to investigate on the achievement of
the results to half a term though the indicators constructed such a
effect are useful so much for the evaluation of the execution of
the program or project as to evaluate the final results.

Evaluation of the ending of the program or project

the intention of this evaluation is it of knowing the efficiency,
efficiency and efficiency of the actions of the program or project and
investigating on the consequences in terms of modifications that him
are attributable in direct form in relation with the problematic aspects
that gave to him origin.
IMPACT INDICATORS
OUTPUTS
INDICATORS

Evaluation Criteria
The criteria of evaluation are the critical points for the project valuation. In this
case, it is necessary to emphasize that these criteria are intimately tied by the
Approach of the logical framework, the methodology used habitually in the
formulation of interventions in the social action.

CRITERIA OF EVALUATION AND COMPONENTS OF THE MATRIX OF PLANNING OF A PROJECT

EFFICIENCY

GENERAL

EFFECTIVENES

RELEVANCE

VIABILIT

COVERAGE

IMPACT

ACTIVITIES

RESOURCES

OBJECTIVE
SPECIFIC
OBJECTIVE
RESULTS

EFFECTIVENE
SS

Efficiency is a measure that relates the specific objectives of

the program or project results focusing on the degree of
compliance of both

a measure of the productivity of the implementation

process. How far the results have been achieved
correspond to the appropriate use of resources of all
kinds.

RELEVANCY

EFFICIENCY

has vital importance from the first phases of identification

and planning and is a measure of the adequacy of the results
and the aims of the program or project to the context in the
one that is executed

is the measure or the degree in which the positive effects

derived from the project or program extend in the time
even if already external supports do not exist.

VIABILITY

COVERAGE

Consists of evaluating up to what point a program comes

to the population object of the same one. It is a question
of calculating not only the rate of coverage but also to
analyze if bias exists in the coverage and to effect an
analysis of the possible barriers of access to the program

The impact does direct reference to the effects or

consequences of the program or project on a population
especially even beyond the aims proposed originally.

IMPACT

ASSESSMENT TOOLS
They are a generic way to refer about the different types of
recollection and analysis of information that can be utilized.
Recollection of

Recollection
of information: In this process it is possible to distinguish the
information
techniques and the instruments. Between the most utilized techniques
you can find the observation, the pools, the interview, and the
documented analysis and between the instruments you may find:
surveys, guides, control lists and the content matrix.

Analysis of information: Quantitative and

qualitative strategies.
In this process that most common distinction is between
the qualitative and quantitative strategies, even when the
actual trend is to utilize tools from both parts in a
complementary way.

FINAL
EVALUATION
INTERVENTION IN PSYCHOSOCIAL
PROBLEMS

FINAL EVALUATION:
REPORT

The evaluation report is the

end product of the work
documentary
evaluation
where the results of the
process are collected. Its
format will be related to
the Terms of Reference and
its development is payable
by the evaluation team.

Types of Final Evaluation

External
Deliverby personnel belonging to the managing body of
the intervention, what opinion to increase the
independence and credibility of the evaluation.

Mixed or assisted internal

This type of evaluation is carried out with participation of
the actors involved in the intervention: financer, external
evaluator and external evaluator. This kind of evaluation
has as main objective is to generate greater learning
among all the actors who have participated in the
project.

The evaluation cycle

Chapter 1: Preparing for the assessment

This is the initial stage of the evaluation process,
whose purpose is to plan the evaluation process.
At this stage the managing body of the
assessment is responsible for performing the
following actions:

Chapter 2: Implementation of theassessment

At this stageto start the evaluation with the
participation of all stakeholders.

 Chapter 3: Assessment of the Box

In order to capitalize on the results of the
evaluation, incorporating the recommendations
and lessons learned in the process, at this stage
the management entity will have a dual
responsibility

Chapter 4: Socialization of the assessment

The goal of this last stage is to promote the
strengthening of the culture of evaluation in the
Valencia cooperation through the exchange of
experiences,
lessons
learned
and
recommendations of the evaluation product
delivered.

Final review of the evaluation

plan
In this step the entity responsible for managing the
evaluation or irritating to evaluator provide all the
documentation we respectfully submit essentially to the
project: Logical Framework Matrix, "follow-up reports and
other documents that are considered 'replacing it, so that the
evaluator we make adjustments to your initial proposal
evaluation, with particular emphasis on the methodology, the
work plan of field and the tools for the working ok a collection
of information.

INTEGRANTE
S
Nuez Calderon, Aaron

Ilene
Loayza Vsquez, Ana Paula
Sandoval Avalos, Fiorella
Zegarra Cruz Maria Isabel