Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPTIMIZATION OF PROPOSED
MARALA HYDROPOWER
PROJECT
Presented by
Introduction
Project Location Map
Project Area
Introduction
Back Ground of Proposed Marala
Hydropower Project
This
Introduction
Proposed Marala Hydropower Project
Salient Features
Proposed on Upper Chenab Canal
(Main Line Upper) at RD. 2+850
Powerhouse and Spillway are Proposed
in Bypass Channel.
Designed Discharge for power is
420m3/sec.
Installed Power Potential is 7.64 MW.
Annual Energy Production is 44.05
GWh.
Plant Factor is 64%.
5
Introduction
Marala Barrage
Salient Features
Construction Year = 1968
Location = 25 Km north of Sialkot
Designed Capacity = 33,994 m/sec
Total Width = 1363 m
Max. Pond Level in Summer = 247.50 m (812.0 ft)
Max. Pond Level in Winter = 246.26 m (808.0
ft)
2 No. Canals are offtaking
i.
Introduction
Upper Chenab Canal
Salient Features
Existing Designed Data:
Designed Discharge
= 477 m/sec
Designed Longitudinal Slope = 0.00015
Designed Bed Width
= 97.53 m
Full Supply Depth = 3.66 m
Designed on Laceys Regime Theory
At RD. 0+000
Full Supply Level
= 244.79 m
Bed Level
= 241.13 m
At RD. 133+296
Full Supply Level
= 238.70 m
Bed Level
= 235.04 m
7
Objectives of Study
To optimize proposed Marala hydropower
project considering:
The possibility of revising pond level of
Marala barrage for enhancing power
potential.
Any other hydraulic intervention on the
canal which can provide additional power
potential.
2. To evaluate technically feasible solution for
the selection of hydraulic machinery for
achieving maximum power benefits.
1.
Methodology
2.
3.
10
11
Channel
Designed
Discharges
(cumec)
(cusec)
Remodeled
Discharges
(cumec)
(cusec)
BRBDC
206
7260
Nokhar Branch
20
722
UCC (Lower)
239
8145
322
11375
UCC
477
16850
562
19850
12
13
15
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Days of Year
Historical Average Existing Discharges
Existing Designed Discharge = 477
16
2,000
1,500
Average Daily Discharges (cumecs)
1,000
500
100
200
300
400
Days of Year
Average Discharges D/S Marala
17
600
500
400
300
Average Daily Discharges (cumecs)
200
100
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Days of Year
Average Existing Discharges
Existing Designed Discharge = 477
18
600
500
400
300
Average Daily Discharges (cumecs)
200
100
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Days of Year
20
2.
Days of Year
Average Daily Pond Levels
Average Daily Water Levels (D/S)
21
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Days of Year
Historical Head Across
Permissible Head Across
22
23
Remodeling)
24
Levels (m)
240
238
236
234
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Existing Designed BL
Remodel BL (S=0.00015)
Remodel BL (S=0.00014)
Remodel BL (S=0.00013)
Existing BL
25
Remodeling)
a)
b)
c)
26
Discharges of UCC
B.
Operations of UCC
C.
D.
2.
3.
4.
5.
27
Basis of Evaluation
For each Proposal
Internal rate of return (IRR), net present value (NPV) and benefit cost
ratio
(B/C) are calculated for the resulting scenario of each of the
proposal.
28
Design
Turbine
Rated
Flow
Q Available
Discharge Head
for % of
Time
No. of
Total
Energy
Plant
Turbine Power
Production Factor
Units Potential
cumecs
cumecs
(No.)
MW
GWh
Proposal 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
30.0
35.0
43.0
50.0
55.0
392.52
368.79
330.86
283.17
260.13
98.13
92.20
82.72
70.79
65.03
2.63
2.63
2.63
2.63
2.63
4
4
4
4
4
8.09
7.60
6.82
5.83
5.36
37.57
37.84
38.06
35.87
34.49
53.04
56.87
63.76
70.21
73.48
Proposal 2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
477.00
374.62
295.84
257.09
217.22
119.25
93.65
73.96
64.27
54.30
2.92
2.92
2.92
2.92
2.92
4
4
4
4
4
10.91
8.57
6.77
5.88
4.97
52.80
46.14
40.33
37.24
33.14
55.23
61.46
68.02
72.27
76.13
29
Turbine Size
Sr. No.
Q
Available
for % of
Time
Opt.
Deign
Flow
No. of
Total Power Energy
Plant
Turbine
Potential Production Factor
Units
Turbine
Discharge
Rated
Head
cumecs
cumecs
(No.)
MW
GWh
Proposal 1
1.1
43.0
330.86
110.29
2.63
6.82
37.56
62.92
1.2
43.0
330.86
82.72
2.63
6.82
38.06
63.76
1.3
43.0
330.86
66.17
2.63
6.82
38.36
64.25
1.4
43.0
330.86
55.14
2.63
6.82
38.25
64.07
Proposal 2
2.1
40.0
477.00
159.00
2.92
10.91
50.27
52.59
2.2
40.0
477.00
119.25
2.92
10.91
52.80
55.23
2.3
40.0
477.00
95.40
2.92
10.91
53.08
55.52
2.4
40.0
477.00
79.50
2.92
10.91
53.24
55.69
30
Proposal 3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Proposal 4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Proposal 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Design
Turbine
Rated
Q Available Flow
Discharge Head
for % of
Time
cumecs cumecs
m
No. of
Total
Turbine
Power
Units Potential
Energy
Plant
Production Factor
(No.)
MW
GWh
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
562.00
480.59
374.62
295.84
257.09
140.50
120.15
93.65
73.96
64.27
2.92
2.92
2.92
2.92
2.92
4
4
4
4
4
12.86
11.00
8.57
6.77
5.88
44.90
42.85
38.14
33.93
31.54
39.86
44.48
50.80
57.23
61.21
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
562.00
480.59
374.62
295.84
257.09
140.50
120.15
93.65
73.96
64.27
3.28
3.28
3.28
3.28
3.28
4
4
4
4
4
14.48
12.38
9.65
7.62
6.62
53.37
50.58
44.84
39.68
36.76
42.08
46.63
53.03
59.42
63.35
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
562.00
480.59
374.62
295.84
257.09
140.50
120.15
93.65
73.96
64.27
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
4
4
4
4
4
15.74
13.46
10.49
8.28
7.20
57.86
54.85
48.68
43.08
39.90
41.97
46.52
52.97
59.36
63.27
31
Sr. No.
Proposal 3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Proposal 4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Proposal 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
Turbine Size
Opt.
Deign
Flow
Turbine
Discharge
Rated
Head
cumecs
cumecs
(No.)
MW
GWh
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
562.00
562.00
562.00
562.00
187.33
140.50
112.40
93.67
2.92
2.92
2.92
2.92
3
4
5
6
12.86
12.86
12.86
12.86
43.03
44.90
46.49
46.44
38.20
39.86
41.27
41.23
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
562.00
562.00
562.00
562.00
187.33
140.50
112.40
93.67
3.28
3.28
3.28
3.28
3
4
5
6
14.48
14.48
14.48
14.48
51.03
53.37
55.15
55.20
40.23
42.08
43.48
43.52
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
562.00
562.00
562.00
562.00
187.33
140.50
112.40
93.67
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3
4
5
6
15.74
15.74
15.74
15.74
55.32
57.86
59.77
59.87
40.12
41.97
43.36
43.43
Q
Available
for % of
Time
No. of
Total
Turbine
Power
Units
Potential
Energy
Plant
Production Factor
32
Optimized
No. of
Total
Annual
Rated
Plant
Design
Turbine Power
Energy
Proposal Discharge Head Units Potential Production Factor
No.
(cumecs)
(m)
(No.)
(MW)
(GWh)
330.86
2.63
6.82
38.36
64.25
477.00
2.92
10.91
53.24
55.69
562.00
2.92
12.86
46.49
41.27
562.00
3.28
14.48
55.20
43.52
562.00
3.57
15.74
59.87
43.43
33
Economic Analysis
Optimized
Designed
Discharge
Total Power
Potential
(cumecs)
(MW)
(GWH)
330.86
6.82
477.00
Proposal No.
Annual
Energy
Plant
Factor
IRR
B/C
NPV
(%)
(%)
(M Rs.)
38.36
64.25
15.72
1.33
338.75
10.91
53.24
55.69
17.20
1.47
604.69
562.00
12.86
46.49
41.27
14.15
1.19
261.12
562.00
14.48
55.20
43.52
16.01
1.36
517.13
562.00
15.74
59.87
43.43
16.79
1.43
640.49
34
Optimized
Designed
Proposal No. Discharge
Economic Analysis
Total Power
Potential
Annual
Energy
Plant
Factor
(cumecs)
(MW)
(GWH)
330.86
6.82
477.00
IRR
B/C
NPV
(%)
(%)
(M Rs.)
38.36
64.25
15.72
1.33
338.75
10.91
53.24
55.69
17.20
1.47
604.69
562.00
12.86
46.49
41.27
1.00
0.00
562.00
14.48
55.20
43.52
1.15
252.78
562.00
15.74
59.87
43.43
1.22
376.14
* 10% of present value of remodeling cost of UCC has been included in the cost
of proposed Marala HPP.
35
Economic Analysis
Annual
Energy
Plant
Factor
IRR
B/C
NPV
Remarks
(cumecs)
(MW)
(GWH)
(%)
(%)
(M Rs.)
477.00
10.91
53.24
55.69
17.20
1.47
604.69
1.43
Without
640.49 Considering
Remodeling Cost
1.22
376.14
562.00
15.74
59.87
43.43
562.00
15.74
59.87
43.43
16.79
No Remodeling
Involves
Considering
Remodeling Cost
36
37
Q
Secenari Available
for % of
o No.
Time
No. of
Total
Annual
Design
Plant
Turbine Rated
Turbine Power
Energy
Discharge Discharge Head
Factor
Units Potential Production
(cumecs)
cumecs
(m)
(No.)
(MW)
(GWh)
(%)
2.1
40.0
477.00
79.50
2.92
10.91
53.24
55.69
2.2
45.0
374.62
62.44
2.92
8.57
46.54
61.99
2.3
50.0
295.84
49.31
2.92
6.77
39.80
67.12
2.4
55.0
257.09
42.85
2.92
5.88
36.45
70.73
2.5
60.0
217.22
36.20
2.92
4.97
32.47
74.59
38
Economic Analysis
Optimized
Total Power
Designed
Potential
Discharge
Annual
Energy
(cumecs)
(MW)
(GWH)
2.1
477.00
10.91
2.2
374.62
2.3
Scenario
No.
Plant
Factor
IRR
B/C
NPV
(%)
(%)
(M Rs.)
53.24
55.69
17.20
1.47
604.69
8.57
46.54
61.99
16.73
1.43
493.23
295.84
6.77
39.80
67.12
16.51
1.41
407.45
2.4
257.09
5.88
36.45
70.73
16.41
1.40
366.68
2.5
217.22
4.97
32.47
74.59
15.87
1.35
296.08
39
Conclusions
1.
2.
3.
40
Recommendations
1.
2.
41
QUESTIONS?
42
THANKS
43