Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMPLEMENTATION OF OUTCOME
BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
Total Slides 49
Estimated Time: 60
Minutes 3
WHAT ??
DEFINITIONS
4
INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING
ALLIANCES
Accept that accreditation procedures are
comparable
Accept one anothers accredited degrees
from date of Full Membership
Agree to identify & encourage implementation of
best practice
Accept mutual monitoring
Accept that it applies to accreditations in home
jurisdictions only
5
INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING
ALLIANCES
Education Accords
Washington Accord
Sydney Accord
Dublin Accord
Mecca Accord
Seoul Accord
FEIAP
6
WASHINGTON ACCORD
7
WASHINGTON ACCORD FULL Provisional
SIGNATORY
Australia - Engineers Australia (1989) Status
New Zealand - Institution of Professional Sri Lanka
Engineers NZ (1989)
Canada - Engineers Canada (1989)
Banglade
United States - Accreditation Board for sh
Engineering and Technology (1989)
United Kingdom - Engineering Council UK Pakistan
(1989) China
Ireland - Engineers Ireland (1989)
Hong Kong China - The Hong Kong Phillipine
Institution of s
Engineers (1995)
South Africa - Engineering Council of
South Africa (1999)
Japan - Japan Accreditation Board for New
Engineering Education (2005) Applicants
Singapore - Institution of Engineers
Singapore (2006) Thailan
Chinese Taipei - Institute of Engineering
Education Taiwan (2007) d
Korea - Accreditation Board for Indones
Engineering Education of Korea
(2007) ia
MalaysiaInstitute
- Board of Engineers
of Space Technology
8
WASHINGTON ACCORD
PHILOSOPHY
OBE is a process that involves the
restructuring of curriculum, assessment
and reporting practices in education to
reflect the achievement of high order
learning and mastery rather than
accumulation of course credit
9
WHY
ADVANTAGES AND
COMPULSIONS
10
OBE LEADS TO
Improved Learning
Increase in Institutional
effectiveness
Enhanced Accountability
11
BENEFITS OF OBE
More directed & coherent curriculum
Graduates will be more relevant to
industry & other stakeholders
Continual Quality Improvement
(CQI) is an inevitable consequence
1
PEC ACCREDITATION
13
CONTEMPORARY PROGRAMS / HEI
IST
CUST
NUST
EME
CAE
MCE
MCS
HITech University
UETs
14
HOW
STEPS FOR
IMPLEMENTATIONS
15
ACCREDITATION CRITERIA
17
PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES
Definition
Consistent with the mission and vision of university, and
department
Top down Approach
Formulation through feedback of stakeholders
ORIC
CAC
Evaluation through Feedback
Alumni Survey
Employers Survey
Will be published
Web site
Prospectus
Displays
18
PEOs : EXAMPLE
19
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES
(PLOs)
20
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. Engineering Knowledge
2. Problem Analysis
3. Design/Development of Solutions
4. Investigation
5. Modern Tool Usage
6. The Engineer and Society
7. Environment and Sustainability
8. Ethics
9. Individual and Team Work
10.Communication
11.Project Management
12.Lifelong Learning
21
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES
22
PEO PLO MAPPING
23
ASSESSMENT MECHANISM OF
PLOs
1. The PLOs are linked for each course by course instructor. The
contribution of each CLO towards a PLO is also defined by
instructor. The CLOs are assessed through various tools
24
TYPICAL CLO PLO MAPPING
PLO
S
Code Course Title Cr Hr Sem 1
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
2
MATH- Applied Algebra
1
107 & Calculus-I
3 0 I x x X
PHY- Engineering
2
103 Physics-I
2 I x X x
HU- Functional
3
105 English
1 1 I x x
CH- Engineering
4
105 Chemistry-I
2 0 I x x
ME- Engineering
5
104 Drawing
0 1 I x
Workshop
6 IE-101
Technology-I
0 1 I x x
HU-
7
101
Islamic Studies 2 0 I x x x
HU-
8
107
Pakistan Studies 2 0 I x
CBL- Character
9
101 Building
1 0 I x x
MATH-
10
112
Calculus II 3 0 II x x x
MATH- Differential
11
108 Equations
3 0 II x x x
25
CURRICULUM AND LEARNING
PROCESS
134 credit hours, 8 semesters
18 credit hours / week, 20 weeks for all semesters
Carefully designed and very well balanced
Meets HEC and NCRC guidelines
Engineering / Non engineering
Foundation, breadth, depth, Inter-discipline
Theory / Lab work
Design Courses
Final year Project
Internship Program
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
26
TERMINOLOGIES
27
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES
Outcome Based Education necessitates that the
students learning be wholesome covering all three
domains as given in Bloom's Taxonomy i.e.
Cognitive
Psychomotor
Affective
According to Bloom's Taxonomy there are levels of
each learning domain.
The level of learning in the given domain for every
course in the program is commensurate with the level
of the course (foundation, breadth or depth).
28
DOMAINS AND LEVELS FROM
BLOOM'S TAXONOMY
29
3
CLO DESIGN
Measureable and observable behavioral outcomes
Brief and concise
Achievable, Realistic and within time scaled
Aligned with the assessments and Program Learning Outcomes
Clear and understandable
Kept to a manageable number
33
CURRICULLUM DESIGN
3
DESIGN STRUCTURE OF OBE
ENGINEERING PROGRAM
PLO-4 PLO-5
PLOs..
36
STUDENTS
Seminars to familiarize students with OBE
Admission Criteria
Annual Intake
Admission Response
Transfer of Students
Academic Counseling
Career and Student Wellness Counseling
Class Size (Theory)
Class Size (Practical)
Semester Academic Load
Completion of Courses and Student Feedback
Participation in Competitions
Student Performance Evaluation
37
FACULTY AND SUPPORT STAFF
Faculty Strength
Full-Time Dedicated Faculty
Shared Faculty
Visiting Faculty
Faculty Qualifications
Student-Teacher Ratio
Faculty Training and Mentoring
Faculty Retention, Development and Career Planning
Pyramid of Academic Structure
Faculty Workload (9-12 credit hours)
Faculty Research & Publications
38
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Teaching and Learning Facilities
Classrooms
Labs
Library
Workshops
Computing and IT faculties
Support Facilities
Hostels
Sports and recreational centers
Health care centers
Student centers
Transport in facilitating students life on campus
Enhancing character building
39
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
The required information comprises
Income and expenditure details which can be
extracted from the approved budgets for the
current as well as two previous, but
consecutive, financial years.
Institution is required to provide copies of the
approved budgets and last-year audited
accounts.
40
CONTINUOUS QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
41
CLO ASSESSMENT
42
PLO ASSESSMENT
43
PEO ASSESSMENT
44
ASSESSMENT TOOLS / METHODS
ASSE WHEN
ITEMS PERFORMAN
SSM ADMINIST ADMINI
NO ASSESS ASSESSMENT TOOL CE
ENT ERED BY STERE
ED INDICATOR
TYPE D
EXAMS (QUIZZES, STUDENT %
ASSIGNMENTS, LAB AGE < 40 %
1 CLOS
REPORTS, MIDS, IS A PER
ESE) CONCERN COURS
DIR INSTRUCT
STUDENT E
ECT EXAMS (QUIZZES, ORS
CUMULATIVE BREAK
ASSIGNMENTS, LAB
2 PLOS % AGE < 40 DOWN
REPORTS, MIDS,
% IS A
ESE)
CONCERN
EVERY
STUDENT COURSE
1 CLOS DEPT SEMES
EVALUATION
TER
DISAGREEME
EVERY
FACULTY COURSE NT /
2 CLOS DEPT SEMES
EVALUATION DISSATISFAC
TER
TION > 20%
EVERY
FACULTY COURSE IN ANY
3 PLO DEPT SEMES
OVERVIEW REPORT CATEGORY
IND TER
IS A
IRE EVERY
STUDENT COURSE CONCERN. HOD /
4 CT PLO SEMES
EVALUATION SPECIFIC DEAN
TER
OBSERVATIO
SURVEY OF EVERY
NS IN ANY
5 PLO GRADUATING DEPT SEMES
STUDENTS
CATEGORY
TER
45
WILL BE
INDUSTRIAL LINKAGES
Projects
Open House
Internships
Research
Grants
Job Fairs
46
ADDITIONAL TASKS
47
CONCLUSION