You are on page 1of 4

FIELD XX

GAS EOR STUDIES

Pushman Oil Company (POC),


May 2016

Page 1
Proposed Workflow

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3


R&D (Experiment + Full Filed
EOR Screening
Simulation) Implementation

Full Field Design &


Economic Prelim Field Management &
Economic Assessment
Surveillance

Viability Approval Concept/Project


Approval

No Pilot proposed due to :


low uncertainty on reservoir (i.e.: structure, contact known,
good well control)
High CAPEX
Existing gas injector (injectivity known)
Key assumptions for development concept:
UDC = USD 20/bbl as target
PSC not ending soon, time for breakeven investment
Steady oil price Page 2
EOR Screening

Based on reservoir properties, team proposed to go for Double Displacement


To add Water Injector downdip, optimize current gas injection well/facilities
Proposed RF:
P10 = 15% Incremental, 52MMstb
P50 = 10% Incremental, 35MMstb
P90 = 5% Incremental, 17MMstb
Current RF is very low, room for improvement
Good sealing fault boundary to contain injection
Existing facilities in place for Gas Injection, just add WIM
Best for thin oil rim management
Reservoir pressure decline by 1000psi, require re-pressurization to achieve miscibility
condition

Year
Project Scope & Timeline: Activities
1 2 3 4
Data gathering Screening
Lab Studies
Sample gathering (rock & fluid)
Modelling
Injection water compatibility analysis Data Analysis
Full Implmentation
Injectivity test (water injection)
Coreflood analysis

Page 3
Preliminary Concept & Economic Evaluation

UDC
Scenari
o Elements Cost P10 P50 P90 Remarks Assumption
1 2 WI 20 Workover 6 months cyclic injection
Shut-off & Add-
5 PE 15 perf Deeper perforation
WIM 200 Without smart completions
13.8
Total 235 4.52 6.71 2 High risk - Not suitable for EOR monitoring
Contingenc 258. 15.2
y 5 4.97 7.39 1

2 2 WI 30 Workover Continuous injection


Shut-off & Add-
5 PE 15 perf Deeper perforation
WIM 200 With smart completions (ICV, PDG, DTS)
Power
supply 50 Medium risk - Possibilty of injector downtime
17.3
Total 295 5.67 8.43 5
Contingenc 324. 19.0
y 5 6.24 9.27 9

3 4 WI 40 Workover 6 months cyclic injection


Shut-off & Add-
5 PE 15 perf Deeper perforation
WIM 200 Without smart completions
15.0 Medium risk - Potential lower recovery compared to continuous
Total 255 4.90 7.29 0 discussion
Page 4