You are on page 1of 15

PERSONAL EVALUATION

REPORT (PER)
PER- Observation & Record
OBSERVATION THROUGH FREQUENT VISITS OF CLASSROOMS
VERBAL/ WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS / ADVICE AS A FEEDBACK
OF VISITS
ASSIGNING THE TASKS / DUTIES
ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS
STAFF MEETINGS / MINUTES
INFORMAL OBSERVATIONS
PEER GROUP OBSERVATIONS
VISITS OF LABS/LIBRARAY
OPINION OF VPS/ STUDENTS/ PARENTS
DATA COLLECTION ACADEMICS CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
TAKING THE ODD PERIODS/ CLASSES
DATA COLLECTION BIO-DATA / QUALIFICATION / SUBJECT/
TIME
SOME SUGGESTED MODELS
Option I

a. Present yourself as a Role Model


b. Guide / counsel in isolation
c. Hold staff meetings / Discuss flaws at staff level Collectively
d. Collective written Advice / Instrs on order book guidance / instrs
e. Assembly address Collective advice / instructions

Option II

a. Written advice/ council to only concerned indl


b. Seek reply / keep record of Advice / Warnings
c. Get Peer group support
d Needless to send GSO-I (If somewhat improving)
Option III

a. Repeat case- if warning / advice is ineffective in


option II, then Advice / Warnings copy to GSO-I
b. In second phase after some time 2nd Advice / Warning
copy to GSO-I (Make these part of Official record)

Entry in PER

Enter references of these 2 x pieces of advice / warnings in PER on


the basis of these award him / her Average or Adverse etc

LAST OPTION MAY BE TAKEN AS UNDESIRED


PER TENDERING PROCEDURES

Scales / BPS RO CO
Reporting countersigning

(5 18) Principal GOS-I

19 GSO-I Dy Director

20 DEI Sec / Dy Sec


PER TENTERING PROCEDURES
Main Flaws

Reflection not coinciding to academic results


Part II (Work Description not supported with docus)
Up-gradation cadre is shown - promoted
Grading given by RO does not tally with overall
assessment.
Grading does not match with results of person
Previous performance is not taken into account.
Adverse remarks are not under line in red ink by CO
PER TENTERING PROCEDURES
Main Flaws
Late submission of PERs - cause delay in promotion
Results shown do not match actual board school results.
PERs written by RO in Jan while countersigned after
6/7 months.
Results shown on the basis of grades, not on GPA
Cuttings / overwriting
Imbalance - pen picture and overall grade & assessment
differs
Not properly documented
WHAT S
GOING ON ?
CASE STUDIES
PER EXISTING STATUS
PER EXISTING STATUS
FGEI DTE
WRITING THE PERS SOME
GUIDELINES
WRITE WITH CLEAR / UNBIASED MIND
DONT WRTIE INTO TWO SHADES , BETWEEN GOOD AND BELOW
AVERAGE OR GOOD OR V. ADVERSE

FILL ALL THE COLUMNS WITH YOUR INITIALS


OVERALL ASSEMENT OF GRADE OF EACH PART MUST INDICATE
OVERALL ONE SHADE
DONT OVER-WRITE/ CUTTING, INITIALS ON YOUR CUTTINGS
CHECK THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS /EVIDENCES REGARDING
MENTIONED DUTIES / RESPONSIBILITIES OF STAFF

VERFIY THE ACADEMIC RESULTS


ADVERSE REMARKS BY CO MUST BE UNDERLINED WITH RED INK
WHICH ARE BELOW AVERAGE

ADVERSE BY RO MUST BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED AND COVERED


IN ADVICE & MUST BE COMMUNICATED ON TIME BY CO
15