## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Details of t-test & chisquare test

1

INTRODUCTION

T-TEST - Numerical Data - Comparing the Mean of two groups CHI-SQUARE - Categorical Data BOTH TESTS ARE USED FOR UNPAIRED OBSERVATION

2

T - TEST

Also referred as Student t-test

Suppose we have taken a sample of 100 women and found mean Hb as 11.4 gm. Now the question is whether this sample is from a population whose standard deviation is 2 gm and mean Hb is 12 or not?

What should we be looking at? Is there a difference b/w population mean and sample mean? In this case difference is there Again the question is; Is this difference significant ? Or it is due to chance alone

3

Of course the difference should be large enough to be called significant Now the difference can be written as Sample Mean ² population mean What other factor can effect the importance of the difference ? If there is great variation in the population (Standard deviation with small sample size) the difference would not be of that much importance If there is small variation (standard deviation with large sample size) a slight degree of difference can become important

4

**So we should add this factor as well to decide about the importance of difference
**

The formula becomes Sample Mean ² Population mean Standard deviation/¥N

And this is given the name of t test

5

Hence the t test = Sample Mean ² population mean Standard deviation/¥N Putting the values in the formula t = 11.4 -12 = -0.6 2/¥100 2/10

Calculated value of t = - 0.6/0.2 = - 3.0 Critical value (cut off) = ± 2.00 What should be the conclusion Reject Ho or not As the calculated value is more than critical we reject chance explanation and conclude that the sample is not from a population whose mean Hb level is 12 gm.

6

T=

Example 2 :

In a certain province the proportion of women who are delivered through caesarian section is very high. A study is, therefore, conducted to discover why this is the case. As small height is known to be one of the risk factors related to difficult deliveries, the researcher may want to find out if there is a difference between the mean height of women in this province who had normal deliveries and of those who had Caesarian sections.

No. of women in study Normal delivery CS 60 52 Height in cms 156 154 Standard deviation 3.1 2.8

**1. Calculating the T-Value 2. Using a T-Table 3. Interpreting the Result
**

7

**USING THE T-TABLE To determine if null hypothesis is rejected or not
**

**Significance level (p-value) - 0.05 Degree of freedom
**

- measure derived form the sample size - student t-test the number of degree of freedom is calculated as the sum of two sample sizes minus 2

d.f. = 60 + 52 - 2 = 110

**t-value belonging to the p-value and the degree of freedom is located in the table
**

- t-value belonging to p -0.05 and d.f. = 120 and we find it is 1.98

8

**INTERPRETING THE RESULT
**

Decision Rule Calculated t-value is larger than the value derived from the table. p is smaller than the value indicated at the top of the column. We than reject the null hypothesis and conclude a statistical significant difference b/w the two means. Calculated t-value is smaller, p is larger than the value indicated, we accept null hypothesis and conclude observed difference is not statistically significance.

9

**INTERPRETING THE RESULT
**

t-value calculated in step 1 is 3.6 larger than t-value derived in step 2 is (1.98) p is smaller than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis Observed difference of two cms b/w mean heights of women with normal del. and CS is statistically significant difference.

10

2) TEST CHI-SQUARE (x Suppose you are presented with two vaccines A and B for the prevention of measles. Both the manufacturer claim that their vaccine is better. How would you resolve this issue? If we want to decide the credibility of vaccine objectively. You would ask both the manufacture to provide some vaccine to conduct a clinical trial. 100 randomly selected children were given vaccine A and same number of children were vaccinated with B. Out of those vaccinated by A fifteen (15) developed infection 20 children vaccinated by B developed infection. Which vaccine is better?

11

If Vaccine A Then Producer of vaccine B may claim that this difference is by chance. However the producer of vaccine A will call this difference as significant. The dispute will not be resolved even if the difference is large enough until a cut off value is decided by some neutral person and that neutral umpire is test of significance.

12

**By putting information from the data following 2x2 table can be filled
**

Type of vaccine Infection No infection Total

A

100

B Total

100 200

13

**By putting information from the data following 2x2 table can be filled
**

Type of vaccine Infection No infection Total

A

15

100

20 Total

100 200

14

**By putting information from the data following 2x2 table can be filled
**

Type of vaccine Infection o infection Total

15

85

100

20 Total

80

100 200

15

**By putting information from the data following 2x2 table can be filled
**

Ty of va f to o f to Tota

15

85

100

20 Tota 35

80 165

100 200

16

According

to null Hypothesis

If both vaccine had same effect then we should expect the same number of infection in both the groups. Accordingly the following table shows the shape of the table we should expect if null hypothesis is true

17

Type of vaccine

A B Total

Infection

No infection

Total

100 100

35

165

200

If both vaccine same then half of infection will be in vaccine A and Half in vaccine B and the table will look like this

18

Type o vacc ne

A B To a

In ec on

17.5

No n ec on

To a

100 100

35

165

200

Alternatively we can determine the expected value in cell a by the principle of unit. i.e. Out of 200 the number of infection are 35 Out of 1 the number of infection will be 35/200 Out of 100 the number of infection will be 35 x 100 = 17.5 200

19

If you look care fully then you will observe that in the first step we have divided the coloumn total of cell a with grand total and then multiplied it with row total of cell a. So this two step procedure for expected value can be written as a single step

Expected value(EV) of cell a = Column total x Row total

Grand Total

Thus we can use this formula to calculate expected value of any cell Now we fill the table with all expected values

20

T

e

cc e

I ec

.

ec

8 . 8 .

T

B T

.

According to null hypothesis we should not find any difference in observed value in cells a, b, c, and d. and expected value. Here we find some difference. This difference may be small (insignificant) or large (significant). Hence the next logical step should be that we should subtract expected value from observed value to find the difference. We would get a table like this

21

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80 Total

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80 Total

17.5 82.5 17.5 82.5

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80 Total

17.5 82.5 17.5 82.5

-2.5 2.5 2.5 -2.5

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80 Total

17.5 82.5 17.5 82.5

-2.5 2.5 2.5 -2.5

6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80 Total

17.5 82.5 17.5 82.5

-2.5 2.5 2.5 -2.5

6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25

6.25/ 17.5 6.25/ 82.5 6.25/ 17.5 6.25/82.5

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Cell

Observed Value O

Expected O ± E (O ± E)2 (O ± E)2/ E Value E

Total

a b c d

15 85 20 80

17.5 82.5 17.5 82.5

-2.5 2.5 2.5 -2.5

6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25

6.25/ 17.5 6.25/ 82.5 6.25/ 17.5 6.25/82.5

0.36 0.07 0.36 0.07

Total = 0.86

Prof. Dr. M. I. Siddiqui ± Clinision Workshop

Table 4.12

D.F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .0.50 0.45 1.39 2.37 3.36 4.35 5.35 6.35 7.34 8.34 9.34 .10 2.74 4.61 6.25 7.78 9.24 10.65 12.02 13.36 14.68 15.99 .050. 020 5.41 7.82 9.84 11.67 13.39 15.03 10.62 18.17 19.68 21.16 .010 6.04 9.21 11.34 13.28 15.09 16.81 18.48 20.09 21.67 23.21 .0030 7.68 10 12.84 14.36 16.75 18.55 20.28 21.96 23.59 25.19 .001 10.83 13.62 16.27 18.47 20.31 22.46 24.32 26.13 27.88 29.59

3.84

5.99 7.82 9.49 11.07 12.59 14.07 15.51 16.92 18.31

**( Source. JE Park K. Park, Text Book of Preventive and social Medicine)
**

28

Calculated value of difference = 0.86 Critical value = 3.84 from the table of Chi square at 5% level of significance Decision ? As the difference is less than the minimum difference to be called significant. We conclude that there is no significant difference between two vaccine and we fail to reject null hypothesis. In simple English both the vaccine are of same efficacy and the difference is by chance and we can decide to buy the one which is cheaper.

29

Example: Suppose that a study of the factors affecting the utilization of antenatal clinics you found that 51 women out of 80 who lived within 10 km of the clinic came for antenatal care, compared to only 35 out of 75 of those who lived more than 10 km away. This suggests that antenatal care (ANC) is used more often by women who live close to the clinics.

Distance from ANC

Less than 10 km 10 km or > otal

CHI-SQUARE

2) (x

TEST

Used ANC

51 (64%) 35 (47%) 86

**Did not use ANC
**

29 (36%) 40(53%) 69

otal

80 (100%) 75 (100%) 155

**1) Calculate the x2 value 2) Using a x2 able 3) Interpreting the Result
**

30

Dist

fr m C

Us d C

Did

t us C ( (

t l %) %)

L ss th km km r >

t l

9

31

**By putting expected value of cell from our calculation
**

Distance from ANC Less than 10 km 10 km or > Total Used ANC 44.4 41.6 86 Did not use ANC 35.6 33.4 69 Total

80 (100%) 75 (100%) 155

32

If there are 155 user then the ANC was used by 86 If there was 1 user then ANC was used by 86/155 If there were 80 people then the ANC was used by 80X86/155 (equation 1) 44.4 We can write this expression as 80 = row total (RT) 86 = coloumn Total (CT) 155 = Grand total (GT) So we can write equation one as follow EV= RTXCT/GT Hence we can calculate expected value of any cell with this expression or formula

33

CALCULATE X2 VALUE

Expected frequency (E) for each cell. E = row total x column total / grand (overall) total Each cell, subtract the expected frequency from the observed frequency (O) O-E For each cell square the result of (O-E) and divide by expected frequency E. Add the result of the above step for all the cells

34 Cont«

CALCULATE X2 VALUE

Formula for calculating chi-square value: x2 = § ( 0 - E)2 / E

O is the observe frequency (indicated in the table) E is the expected frequency to be calculated § (the sum of) directs you to add together the products of (O-E)2 for all the cell of the table

For two by two table (which contain 4 cells) the formula is

x2 = [(01 - E1)2 / E1] + [(02 - E2)2 / E2] + [(03 - E3)2 / E3] + [(04 - E4)2 / E4]

35

USING X2 TABLE

**Decide a p-value example 0.05 Degree of freedom df = (r-1) x (c-1) for a 2 by 2 table the no. of d.f. is 1 (i.e. d.f. = (2-1) x (2-1) = 1)
**

36

**INTERPRETING THE RESULT
**

null hypothesis is rejected if < 0.05 which is the case if x2 is larger than theoretical x2 in table

**Step 1 (a) expected frequency for each cell E1 = 86 x 80 / 155 = 44.4
**

Distance from ANC Used ANC Less than 10 km 10 km or > Total O1 = 51 E1 = 44.44 O3 = 35 E3 = 41.6 86

Did not use ANC

Total 80 75 155

37 Cont«

O2 = 29 E2 = 35.6 O4 = 40 E4 = 33.4 69

**INTERPRETING THE RESULT
**

Step 1(b) to (1d) x2 = (51- 44.4)2 / 44.4 + «« + «« = 0.98 + 1.22 + 1.05 + 1.30 = 4.55 Step 2

- (d.f.) is 1 - table of chi-square decided p-value = 0.05 - d.f. is 1, we look along row in the column where p=0.05. This gives us value of 3.84. Our value of 4.55 is > 3.84, which means that the p-value is < 0.05

38 Contd..

**INTERPRETING THE RESULT
**

Step

3 We can now conclude that the women living within the distance of 10 km from the clinic used antenatal care significantly more often than women living more than 10 km away.

39

INTERPRETATION OF EXAMPLE

64% of the women living within a distance of 10 km from the clinic used antenatal care during pregnancy, compared to only 47% of women living 10 km or further away from the nearest clinic. This difference is statistically significant (x2 = 4.55; - < 0.05)

40

NOTE

x2 test applied if the sample is large enough General rule total should be at least 40 and the expected frequency in each of the cells should be at least 5. x2 test can be used to compare more than two groups A table with 3 or more rows or columns would be designed rather than a two by two tables In above example < 5 km, 5 - 10 km, > 10 km data would be put in 2 x 3 tables. d.f. would be (3 -1) x (2 - 1) = 2

41

QUICK FORMULA

For two-by-two tables there is a quick method for calculating the chi-square value, which can replace step 1 described above. If the various numbers in the costs table are represented by the following letters Condition Total + Exposure Yes No a c g b d h e f n

The quick formula for calculating the Chi-square value is

x2 = n (ad - bc)2 / efgh

42

Objectives

By the end of session the participant will be able to Define test of significance Name test of significance according to type of data Able to calculate T test Able to compute X2 Interpret the result Interpret statistical results in simple English language

43

Tutorial

Exercise for test of significance

A surgeon wants to compare the two surgical procedure for hysterectomy, Abdominal Hysterectomy (AH) and Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH) with a research question of infection rate between two surgical procedures. She operates on 400 patient with VH approach and 40 developed infection. Out of 100 AH cases 20 developed infection

Answer the following questions

a) What should be the title of research for publication in a journal? b) Frame Null hypothesis in this case? c) What level of significance you will set?. d) What test of significance you will apply and why? e) Calculate test statistics f) Interpret your result in statistical language g) Describe the result in simple English

Home Assignment

Home Assignment Do exercise 12.1, 12.2 , 12.3 12.10, 12.13, 12.19

45

- STAT.docx
- Educ Degree and Teaching Performance
- The Effect of Using Consecutive & Random Reciprocal Method Accompanying the Execution of Kinetic Skills on Learning Football’s Skilled Performance
- Solutions Chapter 9
- A Practical Guide to Statistics
- Ejercicos Stata Solución
- Sandstrom 1988
- Kiran Chavda-project Report
- Rural Marketing Telephone
- Lean Six Sigma Mentor Guide
- 1-s2.0-S1749772811000145-main
- Studying Effect of Privatization on Application of Management Accounting Tools and Performance of National Iranian Copper Industries Company
- pharmasug-2011-po08
- Behavioural Bises in FDM Project
- An Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting Work Life Balance Among University Teachers the Case of Pakistan
- Hypothesis Test for Two Different Means
- KNOW THE PREFERENCE OF CONSUMER ON HERO-HONDA TWO-WHEELERS
- Thesis Presentation
- Prod Cycle
- Exercise 31
- Erikson Et Al. - Dyadic Analysis in International Relations-A Cautionary Tale
- JMP
- Weights
- ES Calculator
- 10.1.1.393.7860
- Effect Size and Association
- Evidence for Lunar Sideral Rhythms in Crop Yield an Overview
- SPSS problems solved
- T7-3 MS.pdf
- 3360hyp

- Intensive Family Preservation Services
- In re
- Washington State Institute for Public Policy
- tmpAB8B.tmp
- tmpD453
- tmp97FB.tmp
- As 2542.2.4-2005 Sensory Analysis Specific Methods
- tmp7D6B
- tmp19EA.tmp
- Spatial Estimation of the Nexus between the PRC’s Foreign Direct Investment and ASEAN’s Growth
- tmp8596.tmp
- Tmp 7832
- tmp1860.tmp
- tmpB4F7.tmp
- 68648_1995-1999
- As 2542.2.1-2007 Sensory Analysis Specific Methods - Paired Comparison Test
- tmp15FB.tmp
- Cooperation with suppliers as a source of innovation(Eng)/ Cooperación con los proveedores como fuente de innovación(Ing)/ Hornitzaileekin lankidetza berrikuntzarako iturri bezala(Ing)
- tmpB03.tmp
- SSRN-id2249314
- How to Increase Funding for Classrooms Without Spending a Dime
- tmp7D2E.tmp
- A Study of General Mental Ability among Players And Non-Players Of Chandigarh Schools
- tmp2DAD
- As 2542.2.2-2005 Sensory Analysis Specific Methods

- Burned Compact Flouracent Lamp
- 56600901 Confidential Private Placement Memorandum
- Music Cords
- 12 Volt Capacitor Power
- 1382574Placement Memorandum FAQs94 Private Placement Memorandum FAQs
- 56600901 Confidential Private Placement Memorandum
- 39229743 Private Placement Acronyms
- IHRM-Week03
- 39229743 Private Placement Acronyms
- Technology Transfer
- Management by Objectives (MBO)
- msoffice
- Introductory Rites
- Maintenance
- Economic Environment
- 7119237-Benefits
- Ancient Ruined Walls of Masada and Dead
- Readme

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading