Professional Documents
Culture Documents
18
SOURCES OF ROCK PROPERTTIES
Property Symbol Log Core Test Correlation
Porosity ø
Permeability K
Compressibility Cf
Saturation So, Sw
Wettability
Relative Krw , Kro
SCAL
Permeability
Capillary Pressure Pc
19
Radius of Investigation Comparison
Approximate radius of
Method investigation , feet
RFT 10 -- 100
Logs 0.1 -- 5
Cores 0.08 -- 0.30
20
Reservoir Rock core samples
Geologists and reservoir engineers require reservoir rock samples
for reservoir description and definition, reservoir characterization,
and to enhance the geological and petrophysical models.
More specifically, the recovery of a physical sample of reservoir
rock core is essential to evaluate the two most significant
characteristics: the capacity and ability of the reservoir rock to
store and conduct petroleum reservoir fluids through the matrix.
In addition to these characteristics, data on the formation's
lithology and production potential (primary, secondary, and
tertiary) are just a few of the valuable types of information
obtained through a successful coring program.
While some estimates of reservoir rock properties can be made
from indirect methods such as electrical and radioactive log
surveys, accurate determination of various important properties
can only be obtained from physical rock samples.
Reservoir Rock core samples
In fact the data obtained from core analysis are actually
used for calibration of the indirect methods such as well
logs.
Reservoir rock samples are obtained by a process called
coring; that is the removal of continuous formation
samples from a well bore.
To the extent possible, core samples are recovered
undamaged, preserving the physical and mechanical
integrity of the rock.
Formation material may be solid rock, friable rock,
conglomerates, unconsolidated sands, shales, or clays.
The reservoir rock core sample is generally obtained by
drilling into the formation with a hollow-section drill pipe
and drill bit.
Reservoir Rock core samples
A facility is also available to retain the drilled rock as a
cylindrical sample with the dimension of the internal
cross-sectional area of the cutting bit and the length of the
hollow section.
In some cases, reservoir rock material is also recovered in
the form of cuttings (chips of rock) on which some basic
properties are measured.
With conventional equipment, core samples up to 10 m in
length and up to 15 cm in diameter can be obtained.
The recovery of a reservoir rock sample according to this
procedure is somewhat analogous to using a giant apple
corer.
CORING METHODS
Essentially three different types of coring methods are used
to recover formation samples from petroleum reservoirs.
Out of these three methods, two are conventional types,
such as the rotary method and sidewall coring. The third
method called high pressure
coring is a much more advanced technique of recovering
formation samples.
25
ROTARY METHOD
In this method, cores are obtained by a coring bit (which
has a hole in the center) in combination with a core barrel
and a core catcher.
The provision of a hole in the center of the coring bit allows
the drilling around a central rock cylinder.
The rock cylinder is collected in the core barrel through the
coring bit.
The retrieved core is stored in the core barrel.
The bottom of the core is tightly held by the core catcher.
As soon as tension is applied to the drill string the core
breaks away from the undrilled formation underneath.
The retrieved core is eventually lifted to the surface.
The core retrieved using the rotary method is called as the
whole core.
SIDEWALL CORING
Taking a full core from a formation by the rotary method is
an expensive operation; hence, the other inexpensive
coring method called as sidewall coring is used.
This type of coring method obtains smaller samples,
ranging from 0.75 in. in diameter and 2 in. long to about 1
in. in diameter and up to 6 in. long.
The method employs hollow cylindrical core barrels (also
called as bullets), which can be shot in sequence; from the
gun into the formation.
The coring gun containing the bullets is lowered to the
bottom of the well and the bullets are fired individually as
the gun is pulled up the hole.
The coring tools used in sidewall coring typically holds
upto 30 bullets.
SIDEWALL CORING
29
HIGH-PRESSURE CORING
The two conventional methods discussed earlier suffer
from some inherent problems: Formation samples
recovered are subject to loss of fluids due to pressure
reduction as these are brought to the surface.
However, the high-pressure coring method attempts to
circumvent this problem.
The pressure barrel collects the reservoir fluids in their
natural container, that is, the reservoir rock, by
maintaining the core specimen at bottom hole or reservoir
conditions, until the core fluids can be immobilized by
freezing.
Additionally, pressure coring offers a method for obtaining
in situ reservoir fluid (gas, oil, and water) saturations.
HIGH-PRESSURE CORING
The technology used in cutting a pressure core is essentially
the same as cutting a conventional core.
The use of a pressure-retaining core barrel is certainly not
new.
Coring rates and core recovery are comparable to
conventional coring since the pressure core barrel retains the
basic structure of conventional equipment.
An additional requirement in high-pressure coring is the
necessity of freezing the core in order to immobilize the
hydrocarbon fluids within the core.
Once these fluids are immobilized, the core can be removed
from the barrel after depressurization and subsequently
transported (in a frozen state) for laboratory analysis, without
the loss of valuable in situ fluid saturation information, as
discussed in Chapter 6 on fluid saturations.
IMPORTANT ISSUES RELATED TO CORING
METHODS
Despite the fact that core samples recovered are representative of
the physical properties of the given formation, the petroleum
reservoir fluid contents of that particular core sample are not
those of the native rock.
Basically, two different factors play an important role in effecting
the changes that take place in the recovered reservoir rock
sample.
First, the core sample on its trip to the surface experiences a
reduction in pressure as well as temperature, thereby allowing
the fluids contained within the formation to expand and be
expelled from the core.
Secondly, drilling fluids used in recovering the core samples
also interact with the fluids contained within the pore spaces
of the core sample (and also the formation), which may cause
the displacement of native core fluids by the drilling fluid.
IMPORTANT ISSUES RELATED TO CORING
METHODS
Therefore, as a net effect, the recovered core sample may
not contain the representative petroleum reservoir fluids.
The problem of loss of native reservoir fluids due to
pressure and temperature changes is, however, greatly
alleviated in the pressure coring system where formation
fluids are kept intact within the core sample.
The invasion of drilling fluid/mud filtrate to some extent
can be mitigated by selecting appropriate drilling muds or
by using special techniques to encapsulate the core.
TYPES OF CORES
Generally, petroleum reservoir rock properties can be measured
either on whole core samples or small core plugs that are drilled
from the whole core samples. A brief discussion regarding whole
core and core plug samples is provided in the following two
sections.
WHOLE CORE
A whole core sample is basically a complete section of a
conventionally drilled core from a given formation. The
importance of whole core analysis lies in the fact that small-scale
heterogeneity (e.g., for variations in rock properties as a function
of position) may not be appropriately represented in
measurements on small core plug samples.
The advantage of whole core analysis is that it measures
properties on a larger scale, somewhat closer to that of the
reservoir.
WHOLE CORE
Currently, many commercial laboratories are equipped to
conduct various rock property measurements on whole core
samples.
The determination of rock properties using whole core samples
is, however, a much more demanding task considering the
sample dimensions, larger size equipment, and additional time
are necessary and hence the control of experimental conditions,
such as stabilizations, flow-rates, pressure, temperature, and so
on, can be rather tricky. Moreover, cleaning of whole cores can
also be difficult and time consuming, and laboratory analysis is
generally significantly more expensive than conventional core
plug analysis.
In summary, whole cores or full diameter cores are tested only
when there is a reason to believe that smaller samples (core
plugs) do not reflect average properties.
CORE PLUG
A core plug sample refers to a much smaller portion of the whole core
sample. A core plug sample is obtained by cutting cylindrical plugs of
typically 1 or 1.5 in. in diameter and of lengths up to 3 in., from a whole
core.
All necessary rock properties are typically measured on a number of
such core plug samples.
Generally, core plugs are cut from whole core samples in two different
orientations: perpendicular or parallel to the axis of the whole core.
These core plugs, when drilled from a whole core from a vertical well
bore, are called horizontal and vertical plugs, respectively.
The determination of rock properties using core plugs has some
distinct advantages such as relatively short amount of test duration and
ease of maintaining experimental conditions.
A diagrammatic representation of core plugs cut from a whole core
sample is shown in Figure 2.1. The measurement of rock properties on
core plugs is probably the most common practice in the petroleum
industry.
CORE PLUG
Routine Special
Analysis Analysis