Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V2V RA
C om putational O verhead IE E E 802.11p B ased Proposed
C lustering
S c heme
R eliability
G oals CRLLR MMZ
rt l = න f T dt if Test > 0
t
CRLLR ACO Rules
Ant colony optimization (ACO) supports
Optimal route discovery from source to destination vehicle.
Adaptability
Decentralization
Impact of different relative velocities on reliability Impact of different relative velocities on Average E2E
(Number of vehicles 50, R 1000m, t 10 sec) Latency (Number of vehicles 50, R 1000m, t 10 sec)
CRLLR Experiment 2
Impact of different number of nodes on reliability Impact of different number of nodes on Average E2E
(Avg Velocity 60 km/h, R 1000m, t 10 sec) Latency (Avg Velocity 60 km/h, R 1000m, t 10 sec)
Outline
Introduction
I. Clustering in VANETs
II. Major Contributions
IEEE 802.11p based Clustering
Schemes
I. CRLLR Clustering
C-V2X based Clustering
I. MMZ
II. C-V2X based Resource Allocation
Conclusion
Cellular-V2X based Clustering
DSRC based V2V communications VMaSC Cluster head (CH)
has two issues Relative mobility,
Broadcast Storm Relative location
Network Disconnection link life time (LLT)[6] was ignored.
5G to VANETs
Wide coverage
Low latency
Hybrid architecture (LTE + IEEE
802.11p) based clustering scheme
Vehicular Multi-hop algorithm for
Stable Clustering (VMaSC) is
proposed
In VMaSC Communication model
based on 4G LTE
S. Ucar, S. C. Ergen, and O. Ozkasap, “Multihop- cluster-based ieee 802.11 p and lte hybrid
architecture for vanet safety message dissemination,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 2621–2636, 2016.
Cellular-V2X based Clustering
Novel cluster based routing scheme
Stable group of vehicle
An optimal cluster head or zonal head (ZH)
ZH selection metric
Cumulated from relative speed or relative distance or link life time
(LLT)
Contention based on back-off timer
Leads to broadcast storm
MOving ZOnes (MoZo)
Form zones based on similarity score
Network disconnection problem occurs in low dense topology
Proposed C-V2X based clustering Scheme
Multi-hop Moving Zone
M. Ren, J. Zhang, L. Khoukhi, H. Labiod, and V. Ve`que, “A unified framework of clustering
approach in vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation
Systems, 2017.
D. Lin, J. Kang, A. Squicciarini, Y. Wu, S. Gurung, and O. Tonguz, “Mozo: A moving zone
based routing protocol using pure v2v communication in vanets,” IEEE Transactions on
Mobile Computing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1357–1370,2017.
C-V2X based MMZ Clustering
Abbas, Fakhar, Pingzhi Fan, and Zahid Khan. "A Novel Low-Latency V2V Resource Allocation
Scheme Based on Cellular V2X Communications." IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
Transportation Systems (2018).
C-V2X based (RA) System Model
Fakhar Abbas and Pingzhi Fan, “A Hybrid Low-Latency D2D Resource Allocation Scheme
Based on Cellular V2X Networks” Accepted in ICC WORKSHOP 2018 on 5G Ultra Dense
Networks (5G-UDN).
C-V2X based (RA) Algorithm
𝑰𝒏𝒑𝒖𝒕: 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐷2𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠 𝑀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓
𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑔𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠 (𝐶).
𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒖𝒍𝒕: 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐷2𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠 𝑄 = { 𝑙, 𝑐 |𝑙 M, c C} .
1. 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡
2. 𝑰𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒆: 𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐷2𝐷 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠 𝐿 = ; decision set Q =
3. 𝑭𝒐𝒓 𝑗 = 1,2,3, … … 𝐶
i. 𝑀𝑗 ← 𝑀\𝐿, 𝑡 ← 0, 𝑀𝑗 ,0 ← 𝑀𝑗 , 𝐿𝑗 ,0 ← 𝐿𝑗 ; \\ M is the set of possible
links from vehicles in z to vehicle in i .
ii. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 {𝑤𝑗 ,0 (𝑙)|𝑙 𝑀𝑗 ,0 };
iii. 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒆 𝑀𝑗 ,𝑡
iv. 𝑭𝒐𝒓 𝑙 𝑀𝑗 ,𝑡
v. 𝑖𝑓 𝑡 > 0, 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑤𝑗 ,𝑡 (𝑙) based on (12)
wj,t (l ) w j,t 1 l w t l l wt l l
x x
(14)
l Lj,t
4. 𝒆𝒏𝒅 for
C-V2Xbased (RA) Results
Experiment 1: Summary of Simulation Parameters
Parameter Value
The impacts of vehicle relative Road Length 1km * 10km
velocity from 30 to 130 km/h on Transmission range 250m- 1000m
the performance.
Path loss exponent 4
Packet size 112 byte
Experiment 2: Transmission power for D2D 28 dBm
Communication
The impact of different number of Receiver Sensitivity for V2V -90 dBm
vehicles on the latency Distance between V2V Links 100 m
performance. Simulation runs 30
Mobility trace duration 500s
Experiment 3:
The impact of different threshold .
.
Performance Metrics
Average End-to-End Latency
Packet Delivery Ratio
Experiment 1:C-V2X based RA
Fig.2 . Impact of different velocities over average Fig.3 . Impact of different velocities over packet delivery
latency ratio
Experiment 2:C-V2X based RA
Fig.5 . Impact of different Threshold over average Fig.6 . Impact of different Threshold over packet
latency delivery ratio
Conclusion(s)
Reliability
Stability
Complexity