You are on page 1of 27

Professional Learning

Airess Stewart, Katie Jeffrey, Sebrina Shields
Gill 2014:

Elementary ● 4 staff and Principal attended 3 day PLC

summer training
School: ● Guiding coalition created
PLC Journey 2015:

● 4 additional staff attended 3 day PLC summer



● 9 additional staff attended 3 day PLC summer

1. What do we expect our students to


What is a Professional 2. How will we know what they

Learning Community? learned?

3. How will we respond when they

Dufour video

4 guiding questions learn?

4. How will we respond if they already

know it?
PLC Structure

● Each grade level is a team

● The lead from each team is
part of the MTSS team.
● Norms
● Agendas
● Minutes
● Instructional Support Time

1. To what extent do administrators

foster the school to a culture of

2. To what extent do teachers’

attitudes impact PLC?

3. How effective is the PLC process

in improving student
Assumptions and Limitations

● Increase or decrease in NWEA student achievement is highly correlated to PLC


● Reading scores will reflect higher growth and achievement with Instructional Support


● All teachers responded to the survey and interview questions honestly and accurately.


● One school limits ability to compare to other schools

● Difficult to isolate what actual program, strategy or other variables such as individual
Survey data

● Teacher PLC survey

● Grade level PLC lead interviews
Survey results Demographic data

● Over half of the teachers

have been employed at Gill
PLC for over 8 years.
● 70% of the teachers have
questionnaire over 11 years of teaching

and Focus on
Learning Results
Teacher questionnaire open response
What do you like best about What does your Principal do
your PLC? to support PLC?

● Most teachers indicated the ● Most teachers indicated

time to collaborate, identify provided time was most
student needs and share ideas supportive

How could your PLC be


● Most teachers indicated they

would like more time,
structured norms and training
on database system
100% of lead teachers
responded “yes”:
● Do you have professional
learning opportunities for
PLC Lead ● Do you feel your team finds
the PLC process meaningful
Interview to inform your instruction?
● Do you feel PLCs impact
student achievement?
PLC Lead Interview Open Ended Questions

Professional Learning Opportunities:

● PLC Institute Training

● Staff meetings


● Bring back new learning

● Keeps us Focused
The impact of data
Through collaboration:

● Data analysis informs

instructional decisions
● Data demonstrates student
growth and achievement
NWEA data

● School growth report

● School proficiency data by grade
NWEA Reading Fall 2016-Spring
NWEA Growth Data Reading
★ All grades 1-5 met the projected growth in reading
★ 1st and 2nd grade exceeded the projected growth
★ Conditional growth for 1st grade was in the 99th percentile, grew
more than 99% of other 1st graders who took the test
★ Conditional Growth for 2nd grade was in the 96th percentile, grew
more than 96% of other 2nd graders who took the test
★ All other grades were closer to average growth at just above 50%
NWEA Math Fall 2016-Spring 2017
NWEA Growth Data Mathematics
★ 3rd and 5th grade did not meet their projected growth
★ 1st, 2nd, and 4th grade did meet their projected growth
★ The Conditional Growth for 1st grade was in the 99th percentile
★ The Conditional Growth for 2nd and 4th grade was above average
★ The Conditional Growth for 3rd and 5th was below average at the
7th and 37th percentile
Percent of students proficient (60 percentile or higher) for math

Fall 2016 Winter 2017 Spring 2017

1st grade 44% 49% 57%

2nd grade 58% 60% 64%

3rd grade 51% 43% 40%

4th grade 29% 27% 38%

5th grade 46% 35% 43%

Percent of students proficient (60 percentile or higher) for
Fall 2016 Winter 2017 Spring 2017

1st grade 36% 52% 62%

2nd grade 55% 67% 76%

3rd grade 46% 50% 47%

4th grade 54% 46% 47%

5th grade 40% 38% 42%

Research To what extent do administrators
foster the school to a culture of
Findings collaboration?
★ Our research indicated the administrator
■ Scheduled meetings
■ Leadership participation
■ PLC training
■ Data Analysis
★ Challenges for Leadership were reported
■ Teachers want additional time to
meet within the school day
■ Teacher need more training on the
district database system
To what extent do teachers’ attitudes
impact PLC?

Research Findings The survey results indicates that teachers

viewed the ability to identify student
needs, share ideas and view actual data
in PLC’s favorably. The results also
indicated that they wanted to collaborate
during school hours.

How effective is the PLC process in

improving student achievement?

The data showed varied results in student

growth and achievement using NWEA
data from Fall 2016 to Spring 2017. For
example, the average Mean RIT score in
reading went from 187 to 201 for grades
1-5, however 3rd and 5th grade did not
meet their projected growth. Third grade
math showed a steady decline in
proficiency over 3 reporting periods.
Conclusio Gill Elementary’s journey toward improvements
in student achievement has successfully
n included Dufour’s 3 big ideas.

● a focus on learning
● a collaborative culture and
● collective responsibility with a results-

However, change is rarely static and efforts to

maintain a collaborative culture relies upon
listening to and responding to all stakeholders.
This is one method to ensure continuous
improvement activities are systemic and
● Establish short and long-term
Recommendatio meeting structures to include:
ns ○ Common formative
○ Yearly goals and set agendas for
each meeting.
○ Additional time for collaboration
inside school hours
● Explore additional data analysis for
the progressive decline in NWEA
scoring in grade 3-5
● Consider collaboration between
schools with NWEA data analysis.
● Discuss possible variables that are
ns contributing to NWEA scores

● Look beyond DuFour’s guiding questions to

provide additional understanding of growth

and achievement challenges (e.g. root

cause analysis)

● Create a book of knowledge to leverage

and document successful strategies that

can be used district-wide.

1. Collaboration amongst other
Implication for elementary schools in the
Future Farmington district.
2. Collaboration with elementary
Research schools outside the district
with similar populations.
3. Focus on a continued internal
check of PLC efficiency and
4. Triangulate data outside of the
PLC process to look for other
variables that impact student
growth and achievement.
For additional information, please
contact us:

Thank you! airess.stewart@farmington.k12.mi.