ANPQP Version 2 3 Changes

ANPQP Version 2.
3
Dear Nissan Supplier:
ANPQP has been updated to Version 2.3. It is now available on the Nissan
North America Supplier Portal.
All suppliers should start using the new version with their next document
submissions. (by mid June 2013)
All suppliers are to Have a Supplier ANPQP Representative (SAR) for each
location. This SAR is to be trained in ANPQP V2.2 or V2.3. Training in V2.3
will begin with the June classes.
Here is the link to schedule training:

http://cediam.org/anpqp/
The following slides are a brief description of the changes.
May, 2013
1
ANPQP Revision
Version 2.3
April 2013
ANPQP Maintenance Committee
2
Index
New Revision Summary
New Revision Contents
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements
2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”
3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”
4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)
5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)
6. Other Changes
3
Main Request
•Collect together all requirements developed since V2.2 publication and
incorporate into the new revision.
•Improve usability by changing format etc.
Alliance
•Study and improve Sub-Supplier Management.
•Reinforce Change Management for Process/ Facility Site Change Management.
•Include the ISO 26262 requirement for Special Characteristics Management.
Nissan
•Incorporate a procedure for 4. Product Development to clarify the required
documentation.
•Incorporate reinforced requirements for Environmental Requirements.
Renault
•Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on product and process
conformity by eliminating “duplicate items”.
•Ensure consistency with Renault’s V3P milestones and Lean ANPQP.
4

Commonised “Supplier Contact Directory” and “Design Potential FMEA”.

Reinforced “Sub-Supplier Management” such as “CSCC format” to clarify sub-
supplier’s development experience during the early phase.
Reinforced “Supplier Inspection Report” including Renault’s “Part Status Report”
Reinforced “Change Management” such as “Process/ Facility Site Change
Management” to find 4M changes earlier.
3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development” (Alliance / Nissan)

“Product Development” Element re-structured to clarify Special Characteristics
activity.
Clarification of which tools are required during a Full Process Design Review as
Nissan Unique requirement.
5

Standardized Nissan unique requirements for “Environmental requirements” and
“Project Development Record”.

Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on product and process
conformity by eliminating “duplicate items”.
Ensure consistency with Renault’s V3P milestones and Lean ANPQP.
6. Other Changes
6
Index
6. Other Changes
7
1) Supplier Contact Directory (Activity 3.1)

Merged the Renault and Nissan document submission timing.
2) Design Potential FMEA (Activity 4.1)

Merged the Renault “Product Potential FMEA” into the “Design Potential
FMEA” as a general requirement.
8
Index
6. Other Changes
9
2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)

Several items have been added to clarify the development experience of sub-
suppliers.
Format “CSCC”
Add the development responsibility and experience of sub-suppliers, in order to
confirm sub-supplier maturity and actions to study quality during development.
Add the items

Development
Supplier Feature Manufacturing Feature experience of the
Product Tier N supplier
*
Feature (Where the supplier
Business Plant/Proce Method /
Development responsibility
Product Structure Manufacturing Plant has development
Experience ss/Line technology
of the Tier N supplier

responsibility)
Renault/Nissan specified
New for the Tier N supplier
New commodity for Tier1
Development experience
Location
Vehicle manufacturer
New for the supplier
New for the supplier
and vehicle model

Supplier
Name
Plant Name
*
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5…N Country State, City
10
2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)

The submission level of a Low level supplier has changed from “3” to “2” to
secure sub-supplier management.
Raise submission level Add activity timing
11
6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation

The Renault “Part Status Report has been incorporated into the Alliance
“Inspection Report” to clarify the origin of the delivered parts.
Format ” Part Status Report” Format ”Inspection Report”

RENAULT S.A.
ANPQP - Part Status Report
Document Reference No / Version :

ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT
S 1
Renault Project : Product Renault - CSR R 2 Comments
The part complies with the drawing issue YES NO Document version date :
level released in the system
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: Document origin date : R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.:
The part is grained YES NO
Supplier Plant : Author: Tel N°: Doc Rev. Date:
The raw material is mass production YES SerialNO
A B C OBD 2
Part Name : / Batch No :
R Doc. Origin Date:
Part No & Issue level : Control Plan Reference / Version :
The part is OK (Inspection Report, YES NO Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Design Note N°/ DEVO : Supplier Test Plan and Report)
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
In case of "NO", explain in the "Comments" column.
P1 shows
Part Name: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Manufacturing Status Comments
PART PRODUCTION DATE Criteria Part No. & Issue Level: Average weight:
Definive Not Definitive
SUPPLIER COMMENTS : Design Note No. / DEVO: Serial / Batch No. / RAN:
Plant
Milestone: Part production date:
Assembly line
Staff Product
Part complies with the drawing issue level released in the system
Yes No Comments (if "No" explain)Part Status,
Part is grained
Raw material is mass production
Part is OK (Inspection Report, Supplier Test Plan and Report)
and
Manufacturing Status Definitive Not Definitive Comments
P2 shows
Plant
Format ”Inspection Report”

Assembly line
Operators
Inspection
Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other
Report.
ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT
ANPQP criteria
(complete and submit ANPQP documentation)
No. Special Characteristic Nominal Lower Results (=number,pass,OK) Conformance
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: Upper Method of Measurement,
Doc Rev. Date: (match Character Specification Dimension Tolerance Not
A B C OBD Tolerance 1 2 3 4 5 OK Reports, or Comments
R
2
Doc. Origin Date: KFD) Symbol and Tolerance (numeric only) (use - sign) OK
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
Part Name: Milestone:
Part No. & Issue Level: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Design Note No. / DEVO: Average weight:
Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other
Special Results Conformance

No. Characteristic / Characteristic, Specification and Tolerance Not Reports / Comments
1 2 3 4 5 OK
Key Feature ID OK
12
9.2 Process/ Facility Site Change Management

For reinforcement of 4M change management, the submission timing of a
request has changed from 20 working days before the planned
implementation to 3 months (13weeks) before initiation of the change.
Submission Submission
“For Process Changes, the “For Process Changes, the
Process / Facility Site Change Process / Facility Site Change
Request document shall be Request document shall be
submitted at least 20 working submitted at least 3 months
days before the planned before initiation of any
implementation.”
physical change or move.”
13
Index
6. Other Changes
14
4. Product Development
The required activities and tools have been clarified to secure the
implementation of Product Development. (Nissan unique)
Clarification of activities and tools (Nissan)
15
4. Product Development
To secure the implementation of a Full Process DR / Quick DR, the activity
timing and submission levels have been clarified. (Nissan unique)
Clarify activity timing
Change submission level
16
Index
6. Other Changes
17
11.3 Environmental requirements

•Standardized “Substance Data Input Standard by IMDS” as NES M0302.
•Reinforced requirement of “Material Investigation report”, it is required to be
attached to the Inspection Report.
18
Index
6. Other Changes
19

Removal of duplicate items:
-Elimination of “repeated” activities e.g.: Traceability and Labelling (11.2) is
also considered in logistic conditions (10.2) and in standard 0010415.
- There is no Renault requirement for activity 3.3
20
Index
6. Other Changes
21
6. Other Changes
1) Added a new self-calculating format to the updated “Inspection Report”.
Format ”Inspection Report”
Add self-calculation
22
6. Other Changes
2) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” in the Alliance Supplier Guide

(ASG)
Updated requirement
23
2) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” in the Alliance Supplier
Guide (ASG)
24
End
25

ANPQP Version 2 3 Changes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANPQP Version 2 3 Changes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANPQP Version 2.

Here is the link to schedule training:

The following slides are a brief description of the changes.

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development” (Alliance / Nissan)

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

1) Supplier Contact Directory (Activity 3.1)

2) Design Potential FMEA (Activity 4.1)

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)

Add the items

of the Tier N supplier

New commodity for Tier1

New for the supplier

and vehicle model

2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)

Raise submission level Add activity timing

6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation

Format ” Part Status Report” Format ”Inspection Report”

ANPQP - Part Status Report

Document Reference No / Version :

Format ”Inspection Report”

Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other

Special Results Conformance

9.2 Process/ Facility Site Change Management

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

Clarification of activities and tools (Nissan)

Clarify activity timing

Change submission level

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)