You are on page 1of 25

ANPQP Version 2.

3
Dear Nissan Supplier:

ANPQP has been updated to Version 2.3. It is now available on the Nissan
North America Supplier Portal.

All suppliers should start using the new version with their next document
submissions. (by mid June 2013)

All suppliers are to Have a Supplier ANPQP Representative (SAR) for each
location. This SAR is to be trained in ANPQP V2.2 or V2.3. Training in V2.3
will begin with the June classes.

Here is the link to schedule training:


http://cediam.org/anpqp/

The following slides are a brief description of the changes.

May, 2013

1
ANPQP Revision
Version 2.3
April 2013
ANPQP Maintenance Committee

2
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

3
New Revision Summary

Main Request
•Collect together all requirements developed since V2.2 publication and
incorporate into the new revision.
•Improve usability by changing format etc.

Alliance
•Study and improve Sub-Supplier Management.
•Reinforce Change Management for Process/ Facility Site Change Management.
•Include the ISO 26262 requirement for Special Characteristics Management.

Nissan
•Incorporate a procedure for 4. Product Development to clarify the required
documentation.
•Incorporate reinforced requirements for Environmental Requirements.

Renault
•Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on product and process
conformity by eliminating “duplicate items”.
•Ensure consistency with Renault’s V3P milestones and Lean ANPQP.

4
New Revision Summary

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements


Commonised “Supplier Contact Directory” and “Design Potential FMEA”.

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”


Reinforced “Sub-Supplier Management” such as “CSCC format” to clarify sub-
supplier’s development experience during the early phase.
Reinforced “Supplier Inspection Report” including Renault’s “Part Status Report”
Reinforced “Change Management” such as “Process/ Facility Site Change
Management” to find 4M changes earlier.

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development” (Alliance / Nissan)


“Product Development” Element re-structured to clarify Special Characteristics
activity.
Clarification of which tools are required during a Full Process Design Review as
Nissan Unique requirement.

5
New Revision Summary

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)


Standardized Nissan unique requirements for “Environmental requirements” and
“Project Development Record”.

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)


Reduce the number of ANPQP requirements and focus on product and process
conformity by eliminating “duplicate items”.
Ensure consistency with Renault’s V3P milestones and Lean ANPQP.

6. Other Changes

6
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

7
New Revision Contents
1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

1) Supplier Contact Directory (Activity 3.1)


Merged the Renault and Nissan document submission timing.

2) Design Potential FMEA (Activity 4.1)


Merged the Renault “Product Potential FMEA” into the “Design Potential
FMEA” as a general requirement.

8
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

9
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)


Several items have been added to clarify the development experience of sub-
suppliers.

Format “CSCC”
Add the development responsibility and experience of sub-suppliers, in order to
confirm sub-supplier maturity and actions to study quality during development.

Add the items


Development
Supplier Feature Manufacturing Feature experience of the
Product Tier N supplier
*
Feature (Where the supplier
Business Plant/Proce Method /

Development responsibility
Product Structure Manufacturing Plant has development
Experience ss/Line technology

of the Tier N supplier


responsibility)

Renault/Nissan specified
New for the Tier N supplier

New commodity for Tier1

Development experience
Location

Vehicle manufacturer
New for the supplier

New for the supplier

and vehicle model


Supplier
Name
Plant Name

*
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5…N Country State, City

10
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

2.1 Sub-supplier Management (Activity 2.1)


The submission level of a Low level supplier has changed from “3” to “2” to
secure sub-supplier management.

Raise submission level Add activity timing

11
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation


The Renault “Part Status Report has been incorporated into the Alliance
“Inspection Report” to clarify the origin of the delivered parts.

Format ” Part Status Report” Format ”Inspection Report”


RENAULT S.A.

ANPQP - Part Status Report

Document Reference No / Version :


ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT
S 1
Renault Project : Product Renault - CSR R 2 Comments
The part complies with the drawing issue YES NO Document version date :
level released in the system
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: Document origin date : R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.:
The part is grained YES NO
Supplier Plant : Author: Tel N°: Doc Rev. Date:
The raw material is mass production YES SerialNO
A B C OBD 2
Part Name : / Batch No :
R Doc. Origin Date:
Part No & Issue level : Control Plan Reference / Version :
The part is OK (Inspection Report, YES NO Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Design Note N°/ DEVO : Supplier Test Plan and Report)
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
In case of "NO", explain in the "Comments" column.

P1 shows
Part Name: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Manufacturing Status Comments
PART PRODUCTION DATE Criteria Part No. & Issue Level: Average weight:
Definive Not Definitive
SUPPLIER COMMENTS : Design Note No. / DEVO: Serial / Batch No. / RAN:
Plant
Milestone: Part production date:
Assembly line

Staff Product
Part complies with the drawing issue level released in the system
Yes No Comments (if "No" explain)Part Status,
Part is grained
Raw material is mass production
Part is OK (Inspection Report, Supplier Test Plan and Report)
and
Manufacturing Status Definitive Not Definitive Comments
P2 shows
Plant

Format ”Inspection Report”


Assembly line
Operators
Inspection
Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other
Report.
ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT
ANPQP criteria
(complete and submit ANPQP documentation)
No. Special Characteristic Nominal Lower Results (=number,pass,OK) Conformance
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: Upper Method of Measurement,
Doc Rev. Date: (match Character Specification Dimension Tolerance Not
A B C OBD Tolerance 1 2 3 4 5 OK Reports, or Comments
R
2
Doc. Origin Date: KFD) Symbol and Tolerance (numeric only) (use - sign) OK
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
Part Name: Milestone:
Part No. & Issue Level: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Design Note No. / DEVO: Average weight:

Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other

Special Results Conformance


No. Characteristic / Characteristic, Specification and Tolerance Not Reports / Comments
1 2 3 4 5 OK
Key Feature ID OK

12
New Revision Contents
2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

9.2 Process/ Facility Site Change Management


For reinforcement of 4M change management, the submission timing of a
request has changed from 20 working days before the planned
implementation to 3 months (13weeks) before initiation of the change.

Submission Submission
“For Process Changes, the “For Process Changes, the
Process / Facility Site Change Process / Facility Site Change
Request document shall be Request document shall be
submitted at least 20 working submitted at least 3 months
days before the planned before initiation of any
implementation.”
physical change or move.”

13
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

14
New Revision Contents
3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Product Development
The required activities and tools have been clarified to secure the
implementation of Product Development. (Nissan unique)

Clarification of activities and tools (Nissan)

15
New Revision Contents
3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”
4. Product Development
To secure the implementation of a Full Process DR / Quick DR, the activity
timing and submission levels have been clarified. (Nissan unique)

Clarify activity timing

Change submission level

16
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

17
New Revision Contents
4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

11.3 Environmental requirements


•Standardized “Substance Data Input Standard by IMDS” as NES M0302.
•Reinforced requirement of “Material Investigation report”, it is required to be
attached to the Inspection Report.

18
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

19
New Revision Contents
5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)


Removal of duplicate items:
-Elimination of “repeated” activities e.g.: Traceability and Labelling (11.2) is
also considered in logistic conditions (10.2) and in standard 0010415.
- There is no Renault requirement for activity 3.3

20
Index

New Revision Summary

New Revision Contents

1. Commonised Renault/Nissan Requirements

2. Reinforced Requirements for “Supplier Management”

3. Clarification of Activities for “Product Development”

4. Standardization of Requirements (Nissan)

5. Simplified Requirements (Renault)

6. Other Changes

21
New Revision Contents
6. Other Changes

1) Added a new self-calculating format to the updated “Inspection Report”.

Format ”Inspection Report”

Add self-calculation

22
New Revision Contents
6. Other Changes

2) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” in the Alliance Supplier Guide


(ASG)

Updated requirement

23
2) Updated the “Other Supply Requirement” in the Alliance Supplier
Guide (ASG)

24
End

25