Computer-Based Training Module: Erosion In Piping Systems October 2006

Effective December 6, 2006, this report has been made publicly available in accordance with Section 734.3(b)(3) and published in accordance with Section 734.7 of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations. As a result of this publication, this report is subject to only copyright protection and does not require any license agreement from EPRI. This notice supersedes the export control restrictions and any proprietary licensed material notices embedded in the document prior to publication.

Introduction to Navigation
‡ Module can be navigated in a linear fashion ± Click Page Down or Enter. ‡ By following hyperlinks for more information ± The file must be viewed in ³Slide Show´ mode for the hyperlinks to work ± Click on a hyperlink to go directly to related information in the training, clicking page down or enter will take you back to where you left off. ‡ Click on the camera picture to view a related photograph, page down, or enter will return to the original page.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

2

Introduction
‡ Mechanical damage is commonly found in piping systems. There are various mechanisms possible. They are normally combined under the category of ³erosion´ or ³erosive damage.´

‡ ‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

3

Examples of Erosive Damage

Pump impellor damaged by cavitation.

Turbine blades damaged by solid particle erosion.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

4

Inc.Purpose This module will: ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Introduce the subject Describe the four common mechanisms that cause damage in piping systems Discuss how these mechanisms cause damage. 5 . All rights reserved. and Describe where damage is typically found. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Inc..g. All rights reserved. steam turbines. e. A short quiz is provided at the end of this module. materials and countermeasures. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. This module will not treat damage in machinery. 6 . pumps.Purpose .Continued ‡ Discuss inspection approaches.

This is contrasted to corrosion which involves a chemical or electrochemical process. All rights reserved. For more information on corrosion ± go to corrosion. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 7 . impinging flows or solid impacts on the surface.Description ‡ Erosion is the damage of materials caused by physical processes such as high-speed.Erosion .

8 . the cause of the damage must be identified as there may be substantial differences between mechanisms. ‡ To successfully manage problems caused by erosion. All rights reserved.Continued ‡ Erosion occurs in a variety of power-plant systems ± see sample photographs. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Erosion ± Description . Inc.

Erosion Mechanisms ‡ The four most common erosion mechanisms in power plants are: ± Cavitation erosion ± Flashing erosion ± Droplet impingement ± Solid particle erosion ‡ These will be introduced © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 9 . All rights reserved. Inc.

Solid Particle Erosion photo courtesy of Bruce Power 10 . All rights reserved.Photographs of Damage Cavitation Erosion Flashing Erosion photo courtesy of Florida Power & Light Droplet Impingement photo courtesy of EDF © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.

All rights reserved. 11 . Inc.Summary Table Cavitation Erosion Fluid Conditions Surface Noise Vibration Flashing Erosion Water U/S 2phase D/S Smooth ± polished Yes Droplet Impingement Solid Particle Erosion Single or two phase Variable No Water Very rough Yes Two-Phase Very rough No Damage rate Non-linear Non-linear Non-linear Linear D/S = Downstream U/S = Upstream © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

see Liquid droplet impingement -. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Types of Erosion Damage For more information: ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Cavitation erosion -.see Flashing erosion -.see Solid particle erosion -.see. 12 . Inc.

All rights reserved.Other Related Mechanisms ‡ There are other types of damage that may be experienced: ± Corrosion and erosion may occur simultaneous (see next slide) ± Erosive effects may also be combined ± Other erosion mechanisms. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 13 .

14 . Inc.Photograph of Corrosion and Erosion Damage Elbow Damaged by Erosion and FAC photo courtesy of Public Service Electric & Gas © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.

All rights reserved. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 15 .Other Erosion Mechanisms ‡ Wire drawing ± high speed liquid flow normally encountered in valve internals. Inc. Steam cutting ± high speed steam flow normally occurring in valve seats or when leaks occur in heat exchangers.

Photographs of Damage Caused by Steam Cutting Steam cutting in a flange Steam cutting in a steam trap body © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. 16 . Inc.

EPRI Report 1011231. 17 . EPRI Report TR-108943-V2. Inc. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.For More Information ‡ CHUG website ± User experience ± Past presentations on erosion. All rights reserved.

True False Question 2 There are materials that are more resistant to cavitation erosion than carbon steel. All rights reserved. 18 .Quiz Question 1 Droplet impingement and solid particle erosion are similar in many ways. True False © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.

Quiz - Continued
Question 3 In order for cavitation to occur the downstream pressure must be less than the local vapor pressure. True False Question 4 In order for flashing to occur the downstream pressure must be less than the local vapor pressure. True False

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

19

Quiz - Continued
Question 5 Data sets are available to describe cavitation in: a) Valves b) Orifices c) Valves and orifices d) Elbows e) Nearly every situation Question 6 Models to calculate the rate of droplet impingement are commonly used to determine susceptibility of components in piping systems. True False
© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

20

Quiz - Continued
Question 7 Flashing erosion and droplet impingement often occur in high pressure drop situations. True False Question 8 Solid particle erosion has been found to have a) A damage rate that is linear with time. b) A damage rate that varies linearly with velocity c) A damage rate that is independent of the particle size d) A well understood damage mechanism e) All of the above
© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

21

Quiz - Continued
Question 9 Noise and vibration associated with a valve indicate that cavitation erosion is occurring. True False Question 10 The critical velocity for damage caused by droplet impingement is much greater than the critical velocity for solid particle erosion. True False

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

22

23 . All rights reserved. Inc.Training Complete! © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

True While droplet impingement and solid particle erosion are both mechanical damage mechanisms. Please try again. they differ in more ways than they are similar.1 . All rights reserved. Inc. 24 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

1 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Inc.False Correct! Droplet impingement and solid particle erosion differ in many ways including material response and velocity dependence. 25 . Return to quiz.

Inc.True Correct! There are materials more resistant than carbon steel available including Inconel. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 26 . Return to quiz.2 . All rights reserved.

partial material solutions to cavitation are possible. 27 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Thus.False Incorrect! There are materials more resistant to cavitation than carbon steel. Please try again.2 . All rights reserved. Inc.

All rights reserved.True Incorrect! It is not the downstream pressure that matters. it is the lowest pressure within the restriction. Inc. 28 . The point of lowest pressure is known as the vena contracta. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Please try again.3 .

e. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute..3 .False Correct! It is the lowest pressure (i. Return to quiz. All rights reserved. 29 . the pressure at the vena contracta) within the restriction that dictates whether or not cavitation will occur.

Return to quiz. 30 .4 . Inc.True Correct! It is necessary that the downstream pressure be lower than the vapor pressure if flashing is to occur. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Inc. 31 . Please try again. flashing will not occur. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.4 .False If the downstream pressure is above the vapor pressure.

All rights reserved.5-A Incorrect! While cavitation information is available for valves. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Please try again. there are other geometries that have data. Inc. 32 .

there are other geometries that have data. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. 33 .5-B Incorrect! While cavitation information is available for orifices. Please try again.

Inc. All rights reserved.5-C Incorrect! While cavitation information is available for valves and orifices. there are other geometries that have data. Please try again. 34 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

there are other geometries that have data. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.5-D Incorrect! While cavitation information is available for elbows. Please try again. Inc. 35 .

36 . All rights reserved. Return to quiz. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.5-E Correct! There is information available for most geometries.

All rights reserved. Please try again. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 37 .6 . Models to predict droplet impingement are not normally used.True Incorrect. Inc.

Inc.False Correct! There are no commonly used models to predict droplet impingement. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 38 . Return to quiz.6 .

7 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 39 . Return to quiz.True Correct! Flashing and impingement are often associated with high-pressure drops and the resultant high-velocity. All rights reserved.

Please try again. All rights reserved. Inc.False Incorrect! High pressure drops are often associated with flashing and droplet impingement. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 40 .7 .

All rights reserved. 41 .8-A Correct! The damage rate for solid particle erosion varies linearly with time. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Return to quiz. Inc.

All rights reserved. Please try again. 42 . Inc.8-B Incorrect! The damage rate for solid particle erosion varies with velocity to a power slightly greater than 2. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Below this value damage does not occur. Inc. All rights reserved. Please try again.8-C Incorrect! The damage rate is independent of particle size above a critical value. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 43 .

Inc. All rights reserved.8-D Incorrect! The damage mechanism of solid particle erosion is not well understood although there appears to be different mechanisms for ductile and brittle materials. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Please try again. 44 .

45 . Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.8-E Incorrect! More than one of the above statements are not true. Please try again. All rights reserved.

Please try again. cavitation erosion will only occur if the collapsing bubbles impinge upon a surface.True While noise and vibration may indicate that cavitation is occurring.9 . All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 46 . Inc.

False Correct! While noise and vibration may indicate that cavitation is occurring.9 . 47 . Return to quiz. cavitation erosion will only occur if the collapsing bubbles impinge upon a surface. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.

Inc.10 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. The critical velocity for damage to ductile materials is about 1% of this value.True Correct! The critical velocity for droplet impingement on steel is about 300 feet per second (100 meters per second). 48 . Return to quiz. All rights reserved.

Please try again.10 . All rights reserved. Inc.False The critical velocity for damage for solid particle erosion is about 3 feet per second (1 meter per second). 49 . The critical velocity for droplet impingement is much greater than this value. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Corrosion
‡ ‡ ‡ Corrosion may be defined as material attack which is chemical or electrochemical in nature. Coping with corrosion has been a continuing activity for power plant operators. Corrosion damage may be widespread or localized.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

50

Examples of Corrosion Mechanisms
‡ Widespread attack ± General corrosion ± Flow-Accelerated Corrosion (FAC). Localized attack ± Galvanic corrosion (between dissimilar metals) ± Crevice corrosion ± Cracking ± Pitting.

‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

51

FAC vs. Erosion
‡ ‡ FAC is the most important damage mechanism active in steam and feedwater related systems. FAC and erosion may be distinguished by: ± Surface morphology ± Extent of damaged area ± Chemistry dependence ± Material dependence.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

52

FAC vs. Erosion - Continued
‡ Surface morphology ± FAC damaged surface has distinctive features. ± Single-phase FAC exhibits a scalloped or ³orangepeel´ surface. ± High-quality, two-phase flow exhibits a characteristic pattern known as tiger-striping. These features are not found in surfaces damaged by erosion.

‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

53

Photographs of FAC Damage Single-phase FAC showing scalloped surface photo courtesy of Pacific Gas & Electric Two-phase FAC in a crossover line showing µtiger striping´ photo courtesy of EDF © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. 54 . Inc.

Erosion . ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Continued ‡ Damaged area ± damage caused by erosion is often localized while FAC-caused damage is normally widespread. All rights reserved. Chemistry ± the rate of damage due to FAC may be controlled by the water chemistry. Such dependence is not present with erosive mechanisms.FAC vs. Inc. 55 .

.FAC vs. This is not true of erosive mechanisms. All rights reserved.Continued ‡ Materials ± FAC is effectively inhibited by small amounts of chromium in the material (i. Thus FAC does not damage stainless or alloy material. Erosion .e. while erosive attack commonly does.1% or larger). Cr ~ 0. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 56 .

57 . EPRI report TR-106611-R1 is a complete review of the subject. EPRI 1013249.Information on FAC ‡ Further information on FAC are contained in the Computer-Based Training module for FAC. All rights reserved. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.

All rights reserved. Inc. Particular areas of concern are downstream of valves and orifices.Introduction ‡ Cavitation is a phenomenon that occurs in a large number of technically important areas including: ± Ship propellers ± Hydraulic turbines ± Centrifugal pumps ± Piping systems. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Cavitation . 58 .

The fluid then locally vaporizes forming small bubbles (also known as cavities). All rights reserved. 59 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. If the fluid pressure then increases. these bubbles collapse.Cavitation ± Mechanism ‡ ‡ ‡ Cavitation occurs when a flowing liquid stream encounters an area in which the local static pressure falls below the vapor pressure.

Cavitation may occur because of flow curvature ± see. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.Continued ‡ The collapse of the bubbles causes noise and vibration. 60 . Inc.Cavitation ± Mechanism . and if close to a solid surface will cause damage to the surface.e. the damage rate varies with time). The damage rate caused by cavitation is non-linear with time (i..

Inc. 61 . All rights reserved.Unsteady Pressure and Vibration © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

62 .Cavitation . All rights reserved. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. The following slide shows a schematic of the damage rate as a function of time.Mechanism ‡ The next slides shows a schematic of the cavitation process at a flow restriction. Inc.

5 1 istance 1. 63 .5 2 © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.Schematic of Cavitation Process 100 90 Pressure 80 0 apor Pressure 60 50 Bubbles form Bubbles collapse 0 0 0. All rights reserved.

Time Note ± the letters A-E refer to the stages of damage ± see. 64 . Inc. All rights reserved.Schematic of Cavitation Damage Rate vs. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Cavitation ± Damage ‡ ‡ Cavitation damage to surfaces is called cavitation erosion.. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. and the vibration often causes more problems than the cavitation erosion ± e. 65 . ± Cracked welds ± Broken pipe hangers ± Damaged valve actuators. All rights reserved. Vibration and noise are associated with cavitation.g.

A commonly used set of definitions is shown on the next slide.Degrees of Cavitation ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ For convenience workers have defined several levels or regimes of cavitation. 66 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. These divisions are often somewhat arbitrary. Different regimes are used for different purposes. but are often used. Inc.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. Critical Cavitation is occurring at a steady state value.. All rights reserved. choked or sonic velocity) flow. Supercavitation or Flashing The flow through the obstruction has reached critical (i. 67 . For information about using regimes in design see.e.Cavitation Regimes Regime Incipient Description Cavitation is just beginning.

bubble and collapse production) is occurring. Noise does not necessarily indicate that damage is occurring. 68 . If the bubbles collapse away from solid surfaces no damage will occur. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute..e. Inc.Cavitation ± Noise and Damage ‡ ‡ ‡ Noise does indicate that cavitation (i. All rights reserved.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 82 dba Typical noise levels for a standard trim valve. All rights reserved. Also described as intermittent light popping or as bacon frying. 69 . Inc.¶ Noise Level Incipient 85 dba Critical 120 dba Supercavitation Humming or hissing.Cavitation ± Noise Regime Description of Noise High-pitched hissing or sizzling. Metallic rattling or shot-blasting often likened to the sound of flowing gravel ± known as µcrepitation.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Morphology ‡ ‡ ‡ Surfaces damaged by cavitation are very rough with a texture similar to a new cement block. All rights reserved. 70 . Cavitation damage is normally localized. See photograph of damage on next slide. Inc.

71 .Cavitation Damage in a Plug Valve More Photos Cavitation Damage in the Body of a Plug Valve © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved.

Where to Look for Damage ‡ Cavitation erosion normally takes place ± In solid liquid flows ± Downstream of large pressure drops such as valves or orifices. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 72 . All rights reserved. butterfly or gate valves used for throttling will cavitate. Often. Inc. Cavitation erosion will be accompanied by noise and possibly vibration.

73 . All rights reserved. Inc. ultrasonic methods should use 100% scans or finer grids than are normally used for FAC inspections.Inspection Considerations ‡ Cavitation damage may be detected using conventional inspection techniques ± usually UT or RT. As the damaged area is likely small. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Material and repair considerations ± see. 74 . Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. There is a tremendous amount of literature available on the subject.Design Options to Reduce Cavitation ‡ ‡ ‡ There are various options to reduce the severity of cavitation. All rights reserved. For information on reducing cavitation in: ± Valves ± see ± Orifices ± see ± Other components ± see.

75 . The approach is normally to compare the local system properties to the cavitation propensity of the component being considered.g. Knowledge of both the local conditions (e. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Calculation Approach ‡ ‡ There are well established methods to calculate the occurrence of cavitation. Inc.. the inlet pressure) and the component are necessary for accurate calculations. All rights reserved.

Calculating Cavitation in Valves ‡ ‡ There is a great deal of information available on this subject. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Detailed procedures for calculating cavitation in valves may be found in: ± EPRI Reports TR-103198-T1 and TR-103198-T2 ± NUREG/CR-6031 ± Valve manufacturers¶ methodologies ± For details. 76 .

± These correlations are normally based on the hole/pipe diameter ratio (i.e. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ± There are methodologies available to design orifices in series to eliminate cavitation. All rights reserved.Calculating Cavitation in Orifices ‡ ‡ Methods are available to calculate cavitation in orifices. For single-holed orifices: ± There are correlations available to predict cavitation. ). 77 ..

the manufacturer should be able to supply necessary design information. All rights reserved.Continued ‡ For multiple holed single orifices: ± Correlations are available for some geometries. 78 . Inc. For proprietary orifice/restrictor designs. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. For more details ± see. ± Manufacturers often have design information.Calculating Cavitation in Orifices .

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Calculating Cavitation in Other Geometries ‡ ‡ There is a great deal of literature available on this subject especially in textbooks on the subject.g. bend. 79 . tee). All rights reserved. design data are available in these sources. Inc. elbow.. For common geometries (e.

´ NUREG/CR-6031. Report 1011231. Hydraulics of Pipelines: Pumps. 1980.g. 1993. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Phenomena. Inc. Transients. Valves. ± Tullis. e. Paul. 1989. Cavitation. Tullis. Paul ³Cavitation Guide for Control Valves. 80 . J. Frederick G.. USNRC.Information Sources ‡ Textbooks such as: ± Hammitt.. ‡ ‡ EPRI Reports.

All rights reserved. intermittent noise present ± Critical ± light. four cavitation regimes can be considered: ± Incipient ± light. and drop off in performance ± flow no longer increases with pressure drop ± see next slide. 81 . steady noise ± Incipient Damage ± pitting damage begins ± Choking ± very heavy damage. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Four Regimes ‡ For purposes of design. Inc.

All rights reserved. Inc. 82 .Non-Ideal Behavior of a Valve 0 2 20 Flow ull cho ed low 0 ho ing egins 0 0 20 0 re 60 re ro 80 00 Ideal ehavior Actual ehavior © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

and ± Cost of the valve. 83 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Some of the factors that should be considered are: ± Operating time. Inc.Using Regime Information ‡ ‡ When designing a control valve. ± Maximum acceptable noise level ± Allowable vibration level. the maximum degree of cavitation allowable should be established.

´ Valves that operate in the choking regime should only operate there for short periods of time (e.Some Design Guidance ‡ ‡ ‡ If noise is not acceptable. then the valve should not operate beyond ³incipient.. 84 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Inc.g. relief valves). then the valve should not operate beyond ³incipient damage.´ If noise is acceptable.

.e. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. on the flat portion of the curve presented above). the bubbles will collapse downstream of the valve. All rights reserved. 85 . This regime is known as supercavitation and damage to the valve will normally not occur.Supercavitation ‡ When a valve operates beyond choking (i. Inc. if at all.

and flashing erosion. Note in this regime. All rights reserved. noise and vibration may occur downstream of the valve. flashing is occurring. Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Supercavitation . the entire pipe section is filled with vapor for several diameters downstream of the restriction.Continued ‡ When supercavitation occurs. 86 .

These occur at locations in turbo-machinery. Inc. 87 . in regions of flow mixing. and in fittings. This is called ³flow-curvature´ or ³re-circulation cavitation. All rights reserved.Introduction ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Cavitation may occur in elbows and tees.Flo Curvature Cavitation . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.´ It is caused by the generation of bubbles in areas of low pressure in secondary or recirculating flows.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 88 . Inc.Cavitation in an Elbo ‡ ‡ Secondary flows occur when streamlines have to adjust to curve around a bend. As the fluid at the extrados has to travel further than the fluid at the intrados. All rights reserved. a transverse pressure gradient is established with the higher pressure at the intrados of the elbow.

All rights reserved. If the process continues. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. the acoustic velocity is reached and the flow rate is a maximum.Cavitation in an Elbo ‡ ‡ ± Continued This pressure gradient induces a flow from the inside to the outside of the elbow. 89 . eventually. At this point. This reduced pressure caused by the higher flow may induce cavitation bubbles to form. Inc. the elbow will choke.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 90 .Void Formation in an Elbo Schematic of vapor pocket formed by cavitation in an elbow. All rights reserved.

Recirculation Cavitation ‡ ‡ ‡ This type of cavitation occurs only when the static pressure is relatively near the vapor pressure. All rights reserved. 91 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. Thus this type of damage should be expected only in low-pressure lines. The next slide shows examples of this type damage.

Examples of Recirculation Cavitation Elbow and tee damaged by recirculation cavitation © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved. 92 .

All rights reserved.Damage To Valve Internals Valve trim damaged by cavitation erosion. 93 . Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Damage to a Reducer Chrome-moly (P-22) reducer. All rights reserved. 94 . Inc. Cavitation downstream of an orifice photos courtesy of Dominion Virginia Power © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Inc. 95 . All rights reserved.Damage Do nstream of an Orifice photo courtesy of Southern Nuclear © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Damaged Surface Do nstream of an Orifice photo courtesy of Dominion Virginia Power © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 96 . Inc. All rights reserved.

All rights reserved. In all cases except butterfly valves. This is normally the lowest cost option.e. Inc.. globe valve). © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Valve Countermeasures ‡ ‡ ‡ Increase cavitation resistance within valve type (i. 97 . there is a more cavitation-resistant style within the same valve type.

.g. globe) under the same conditions. go from butterfly to globe). All rights reserved.. 98 ..´ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.g. Inc. These terms are defined in the section ³Calculating Cavitation in Valves. In general high-pressure recovery valves (e. ball) valves will cavitate before low-pressure recovery valves (e.Valve Countermeasures .Continued ‡ ‡ Improved valve types (i.e. butterfly.

Add orifice or valve in series . All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ± However.Valve Countermeasures ± Continued ‡ ‡ Install anti-cavitation valves see. 99 . Inc.the use of a valve and orifice combination can be as effective in reducing cavitation to acceptable levels. the use of this technique is only effective if the range of flows expected is limited to 1:3.

Valve Countermeasures .Continued ‡ ‡ Add sudden expansion downstream of the valve to keep the collapsing bubbles away from solid surfaces. Similarly. 100 . a target tee-type arrangement may be used to control the surfaces damaged by cavitation erosion. All rights reserved. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Inc. All rights reserved. Various designs are available ± see photographs. ± Use several single-holed orifices in series.Orifice Countermeasures ‡ Three methods to reduce cavitation damage downstream of orifices are: ± Use a multiple-holed orifice in place of a singleholed orifice ± see photographs. 101 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ± Use a proprietary flow restrictor.

Multiple-Holed Orifices ‡ ‡ The use of orifices with multiple holes may reduce or eliminate cavitation. 102 . This approach has some advantages over single-holed orifices including better noise and vibration characteristics and requiring less space than using orifices in series. Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. The disadvantages include the greater likelihood of plugging and different choking cavitation characteristics.

Inc. All rights reserved.Orifices in Series ‡ Multistage orifices eliminate cavitation by breaking down the total pressure drop into a number of smaller steps. Methods exist to allow calculation of an orifice string to avoid cavitation. the pressure drop is controlled by the orifice diameter to prevent cavitation. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 103 . At each step (or stage).

Normally these restrictors are used in high-pressure drop lines (e.Proprietary Restrictors ‡ ‡ ‡ Various vendors supply proprietary restrictors to reduce cavitation. 104 .g. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. Vendors will normally supply design information.. letdown lines).

105 . Inc.Multiple-Holed Orifices Photos courtesy of CU Services LLC © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.

106 .Proprietary Restrictor Drawings courtesy of CU Services LLC Proprietary restrictor design and installation © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved.

Inc.Another Proprietary Restrictor Upstream end Mockup of downstream end showing impinging jets. All rights reserved. 107 . Photos courtesy of Pratt © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ± Changing the location of the major pressure drop (i.. ± Local design changes to eliminate bubbles collapsing near solid surfaces ± e. 108 . moving the pressure drop downstream). abrupt expansions..Countermeasures ± Other Components ‡ Options available include: ± Changing the material.e. Inc. All rights reserved.g. target tees.

These types are: ± µcolliding jet¶ and ± µstack arrangement. All rights reserved.Anti-Cavitation Valve Types ‡ ‡ ‡ There are valves designed to reduce or eliminate cavitation even under extreme conditions.¶ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. There are two basic types. although there are many variants to these designs. 109 . Inc.

110 .Anti-Cavitation Valve ± Colliding Jet Arrangement ‡ ‡ The flow is split and is made to pass through a number of orifices that expand into a sudden enlargement. the trim is cylindrical in shape and the flow passes through a large number of small holes. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. Usually. All rights reserved.

Continued ‡ ‡ Some of these designs have the flows inward where the jets collide with each other in the center. 111 . Inc. All rights reserved.Anti-Cavitation Valve ± Colliding Jet Arrangement . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. the flows are outward toward the valve boundary. In other designs.

. Inc. labyrinth passages). ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 112 .Anti-Cavitation Valve ± Stack Arrangement ‡ The flow passes through a large number of parallel paths containing designed obstructions (i.e. there are stacks of discs containing these obstructions. Typically. All rights reserved.

113 . These valves can be designed to operate at. All rights reserved. Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. or near. the choking limit with little noise and vibration.Anti-Cavitation Valve ± Stack Arrangement Continued ‡ The resistance of the obstructions in the discs can be tailored to control the valve characteristics as different disks may have different flow passages.

to many jets reduces the amount of noise and vibration.Anti-Cavitation Valves ± General ‡ In either of the above designs. found in conventional valve styles. All rights reserved. the change from one jet. The following slides present some anti-cavitation valves with a brief commentary. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 114 .

‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. control requirements.Continued ‡ Some of the designs shown allow a conventional globe valve to be back-fitted to become an anti-cavitation type. Inc. 115 . pressure level. etc. pressure drop.Anti-Cavitation Valves ± General . All rights reserved. Note that there are other designs available designed for different size.

Cavitrol® III ± Anti-Cavitation Valve Example of a Valve Using Inward. Colliding Jets Drawings courtesy of Emerson Cross Section and Operation of a Cavitrol® III One-Stage Trim Control Valve © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 116 . Inc. All rights reserved.

All rights reserved. Note the flow is radially outward. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 117 . Inc.Valtek Anti-Cavitation Stack Valve Drawings Courtesy of Flowserve Valtek Valtek Anti-Cavitation Stack Valve with ³tiger-teeth¶ flow passages.

All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 118 .Valtek Anti-Cavitation Sleeve Valve Drawings Courtesy of Flowserve Valtek Valtek Anti-Cavitation Sleeve Valve with ChannelStream trim. Inc.

These terms are: ± Vena Contracta ± High-Pressure Recovery Valve ± Low-Pressure Recovery Valve ± Cavitation index and cavitation number.Calculating Cavitation in Valves ± Basic Definitions ‡ In order to introduce the calculation of cavitation in valves. ‡ If you are not familiar with these terms. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 119 . see. some terms must be defined. Inc. All rights reserved.

Using Cavitation Parameters
‡ The fluid conditions are related to the valve characteristics through either the cavitation number or the cavitation index. A determination is then made as to: ± If the valve is not cavitating ± If the valve is cavitating, how severe the cavitation is.

‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

120

Using Cavitation Parameters - Continued

‡ ‡

There are variants to this process, although they differ mainly in the details. Methodologies and correlations are available from: ± EPRI & NUREG reports cited at the end of the cavitation section ± Valve manufacturers¶ data.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

121

Outline of Calculation
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Define problem. Determine local conditions. Calculate the cavitation parameter (index or number). Determine valve performance by comparing the cavitation parameter with the appropriate correlation. State result.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

122

Calculating Cavitation in Orifices ± Basic Definitions

‡ ‡

As orifices have a constant geometry, they are easier to analyze than valves. If you are not familiar with the following terms: ± Vena Contracta ± Cavitation index and cavitation number ± See.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

123

1993. Inc. These correlations are available in various references including NUREG/CR-6031. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Single-Hole Orifices ‡ ‡ ‡ Empirical correlations have been published relating the onset of the various regimes of cavitation. 124 . Corrections may be required to account for the diameter and pressure level. USNRC. All rights reserved.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ratio Do/D ( ) incipience critical choking 0. Corrections may be required for other diameters and pressures. All rights reserved.Sample Single-Hole Data Sample line from a table of orifice cavitation parameters vs. 125 . Inc.62 2.500 2.20 1.39 Note: These values are for one diameter and pressure.

Multi-Holed Single Orifices ‡ ‡ There is less cavitation data than on single-holed orifices. from the geometry. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. These data seem to show that the cavitation response is related to the ratio of the total hole area to the pipe area. Thus. Inc. 126 . an equivalent beta ratio should be determined. All rights reserved.

See NUREG/CR-6031 for more information. single-holed orifice correlations should be applied with corrections for pressure and diameter as recommended. 127 . ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Multi-Holed Single Orifices ‡ Using this value of beta. All rights reserved. Inc. Manufacturers¶ data may also be available for some designs.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.Series Orifices ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Series orifices are an effective way of dealing with a cavitating orifice. 128 . Inc. Single-holed or multiple-holed orifices may be used in series. See NUREG/CR-6031 and EPRI 1011231. Methodology for calculating a series arrangement will now be presented.

Series Orifices ± Methodology ‡ ‡ ‡ The first step is to size a single orifice and see if it cavitates. an iterative process must be used to design the orifices. All rights reserved. the process is over. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 129 . Inc. If this design is satisfactory. If not.

Inc. All rights reserved.Series Orifices ± Methodology . Calculate the allowable cavitation index. proceed upstream until the desired pressure drop is obtained. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. assume a beta ratio.Continued ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Beginning at the downstream end. If the orifice is cavitating. assume a larger beta and recalculate. If the orifice is not cavitating. 130 .

the point of lowest pressure and highest velocity is found just downstream of the restriction. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ‡ This point is known as the vena contracta. Inc. All rights reserved. 131 .Vena Contracta ‡ When a flow passes through a restriction.

132 . a highpressure recovery valve will have a lower pressure at the vena contracta than a low-pressure recovery valve. Inc. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.High-Pressure Recovery Valves ‡ ‡ Valves types may be classified as high or low-pressure recovery (see later slide). For a given pressure drop across a valve.

‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. See next slide for a schematic diagram. Examples of high-pressure recovery valves are ball.Continued ‡ The lower pressure at the vena contracta means that they are more susceptible to cavitation than lowpressure recovery valves.High-Pressure Recovery Valves . All rights reserved. 133 . butterfly and gate valves. Inc.

and Lo -Pressure Recovery Valves 110 100 Pressure 0 0 0 60 0 0 0. Inc.High. All rights reserved.4 igh Pressure Recover ow Pressure Recover Vapor pressure Cavitation likel © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.4 0. Loca ion 1 1.2 0.2 1.6 0. 134 .

135 . globe.Lo -Pressure Recovery Valves ‡ Similarly for a low-pressure recovery valve. are lowpressure recovery valves.. e. This means that they are less susceptible to cavitation than high-pressure recovery valves. Inc. there will be a higher pressure at the vena contracta than for a high-pressure recovery valve. All rights reserved.g. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Most types of control valves.

‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Pv W= Pu .P d where: = Cavitation coefficient Pd = Mean pressure 10 diameters downstream Pv = Liquid vapor pressure Pu = Mean pressure one diameter upstream. All rights reserved. Inc. This coefficient is commonly used in the United States. 136 .Cavitation Coefficient ‡ Cavitation coefficient is defined as: P d .

All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Cavitation Index ‡ Cavitation index is defined as: / Pu . 137 .Pv velocity head Pu . Inc.P v VV 2 2 where: = Cavitation index = Mass density of the liquid v = Mean pipe velocity upstream. ‡ This index is commonly used in Europe.

Stage C ± Maximum rate ± the maximum rate of erosion damage is reached as the surface becomes very rough. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. but the subsurface is being fatigued by repeated impacts. 138 . All rights reserved. Stage B ± Acceleration ± the fatigue limit of the material is reached and the material is losing pieces of the surface. Inc.Stages of Damage Stage A ± Incubation ± no damage is apparent visually.

Stages of Damage -- Continued

Stage D ± Deceleration ± the surface has been roughened, and the rate of damage remains relatively constant. Stage E ± Terminal or Final Steady State Stage ± this stage may not be reached.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

139

Flashing Erosion - Introduction
‡ ‡ Flashing erosion is related to cavitation erosion. Flashing erosion occurs when a liquid flow passes through a restriction and the local pressure drops below the vapor pressure forming bubbles (or cavities). In contrast to cavitation, these bubbles do not collapse but travel downstream.

‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

140

Flashing Schematic

100 0
e

0 0 60 0 40 0 0. 1
siti n

a

ess

e

ess

1.

2

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

141

Flashing Erosion ± Mechanism
‡ Since the bubbles formed by flashing have a much lower density than the liquid they were formed from, the average liquid velocity must increase. Flashing erosion causes damage, not from the collapse of bubbles, as with cavitation, but from the high liquid velocities.

‡

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

142

Inc. All rights reserved.Continued ‡ Note that while cavitation may be prevented.Flashing Erosion ± Mechanism . ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. For more information on flashing ± see. The term flashing erosion is here to distinguish it from flashing which describes the flow conditions. flashing will occur if the downstream pressure is below the vapor pressure. 143 .

For more information ± see. That is the restriction is passing as much flow as possible for the upstream conditions.Flashing Erosion ± Critical Flo ‡ ‡ ‡ When flashing occurs. All rights reserved. Inc. the flow is critical or choked. 144 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

´ Note again the difference between cavitation erosion and flashing erosion ± very rough vs. All rights reserved. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. smooth. 145 .Flashing Erosion ± Morphology ‡ ‡ Surfaces damaged by flashing erosion are usually described as being ³smooth´ or ³polished.

Damage Caused by Flashing Erosion Flashing damage downstream of a multi-hole orifice Photo courtesy of Southern Nuclear © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 146 . All rights reserved. Inc.

147 . Inc. photo courtesy of Florida Power & Light © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.Flashing Erosion Damage in a feedwater minimum flow recirculation line.

148 . perhaps as low as the condenser pressure. Inc. Flashing erosion will be accompanied by noise and possibly vibration. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Where to Look for Damage ‡ Flashing erosion occurs: ± In single-phased systems ± Downstream of large-pressure drops caused by letdown valves or orifices Usually the downstream pressure is low. All rights reserved.

Where to Look for Damage ± Continued ‡ It is important to note that cavitation and cavitation erosion may be prevented through design measures. Inc. 149 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. but« ± Flashing will always occur whenever the pressure downstream of the restriction is less than the vapor pressure. ± Vibration and or noise may be present and cause damage.

Inspection Considerations ‡ ‡ Flashing damage may be detected using conventional inspection techniques ± usually UT or RT. All rights reserved. Inc. As the damaged area is likely small. ultrasonic methods should use 100% scans or finer grids than are normally used for FAC inspections. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 150 .

Countermeasures ‡ Design methods to reduce flashing erosion include: ± Use a sudden expansion or a target tee to keep the fluid away from the wall ± Use a larger diameter downstream to reduce the fluid velocity ± Move the restriction closer to the sink ± The use of a proprietary restrictor may help. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 151 .

Materials consideration ± see. Inc. 152 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.Countermeasures ± Continued ‡ ‡ These methods are described in more detail in EPRI Report 1011231.

Valve manufacturers often recommend a maximum discharge velocity. See also EPRI Report 1011231. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Calculation Approaches ‡ ‡ Little work has been done in this area. Inc. A suggested approach would be to calculate the downstream velocity and compare with a maximum allowable downstream velocity. All rights reserved. 153 .

. LOFT series of tests. Inc.Flashing ‡ ‡ Flashing occurs when a liquid encounters a pressure below the vapor pressure. 154 . All rights reserved. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.g. This work was designed to predict the critical flow rate. Flashing has been extensively studied to predict the rate of depressurization following a loss of coolant accident ± e.

. Inc. TRAC) and system analysis codes (e.g.g. All rights reserved.. RELAP5.Flashing . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. RETRAN). 155 .Continued ‡ ‡ Various models have been developed to predict the flow rates in these situations. These models are used in Nuclear Safety Codes (e.

the flow rate is independent of the downstream conditions. 156 . All rights reserved. If the fluid involved is water. this will occur when the downstream pressure falls below the vapor pressure of the water. critical flow will occur.Critical Velocity ‡ ‡ If the pressure downstream of a restriction is low enough. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. At this point. Inc.

157 . Inc.´ ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.´ At this time. the speed of the fluid is the acoustic velocity.Critical Velocity ± Continued ‡ When critical velocity occurs. This condition is also known as ³supercavitation. the flow is said to be ³choked. All rights reserved. At this point. the flow rate through the restriction is a maximum for the upstream conditions.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. As the flow is two-phase (i. Inc. 158 . the flow is traveling at the local acoustic velocity. the acoustic velocity is much less than the acoustic velocity for either the liquid-only phase or the steam-only phase.Acoustic Velocity ‡ ‡ When flashing occurs. steam and water) at this point..e. All rights reserved.

Inc.Acoustic Velocity of a Water-Steam Mixture © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 159 . All rights reserved.

160 .Introduction ‡ Droplet impingement erosion occurs when a highvelocity stream of a liquid jet or a two-phase stream containing liquid droplets impacts a surface. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Droplet Impingement . Inc. damage to the surface will result. If the droplets are big enough and if the velocity is high enough. All rights reserved.

161 . Rain damage to aircraft canopies is another common example. Droplet impingement is also known as liquid droplet impingement and liquid impingement erosion.Droplet Impingement ± Introduction . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Inc.Continued ‡ ‡ ‡ Damage to steam turbine blades is a common example of damage caused by droplet impingement.

Consequently much is known about the details of the processes involved. These details are beyond the scope of this module. Inc.Description of Mechanism ‡ Droplet impingement is an important mechanism in a number of technical areas. All rights reserved. Note this mechanism is not similar to solid particle erosion. Aside from piping systems. droplet impingement is a continuing problem in steam turbines. 162 . ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

163 . All rights reserved. this value is approximately 300 feet per second (~100 m/s).Description of Mechanism ± Continued Tests and experience have demonstrated that: ‡ The damage increases with velocity to a power between 3 and 6 ‡ There is a Critical Velocity. Inc. below which damage does not occur ± For steels. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Continued ‡ ‡ ‡ Above drop sizes of about 1 mm. the damage is non-linear with time. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. damage decreases with decreasing size. damage is not a function of drop size. Inc. 164 .Description of Mechanism . All rights reserved. As with cavitation. Below this value.

Inc. 165 . Time for Droplet Impingement Note ± the letters A-E refer to the stages of damage ± see. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.Damage vs.

Damage is normally localized to the impact region. Through-wall leaks are commonly experienced. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Morphology ‡ Surface damage caused by droplet impingement exhibit a very rough irregular surface with a cratered aspect. 166 . Inc. All rights reserved.

167 .Droplet Impingement Damage Copper alloy condenser tube damage by droplet impingement Overall View Cross Section photos courtesy of EDF © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Inc.

Inc.Droplet Impingement Damage Comparison of an Eroded Turbine Blade with a Test Sample © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. 168 .

All rights reserved. Inc.Droplet Impingement Damage Damage downstream of a leaking valve in an extraction steam line. 169 . photo courtesy of Electrabel/Tractebel © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ± Downstream of valves or steam traps that have failed open. All rights reserved.Where to Look for Damage ‡ Damage caused by droplet impingement is often found in two-phase lines that experience a large pressure drop accelerating the flow to high velocities. 170 . e. ± In extraction lines where the relief valves have failed to shut.g.. ‡ Other locations include at the backside of spargers opposite incoming flows. Inc.

All rights reserved.Droplet Impingement Damage in a Sparger Leak in sparger with sketch showing location. photo and sketch courtesy of Constellation Energy © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. 171 .

ultrasonic methods should use 100% scans or finer grids than are used for FAC inspections. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 172 .Inspection Considerations ‡ ‡ Radiographic or ultrasonic techniques may be used to locate damaged areas. As degradation caused by droplet impingement is normally quite localized. Inc.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 173 . All rights reserved..g. target tee. Improve the material ± see. e. Use separators to eliminate some of the moisture and hence the damaging drops Repair leaking valves and traps.Countermeasures ± General Approaches ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Use larger pipe sizes to reduce velocity ± remember damage ~ v3±6. Inc. Improve the local geometry.

© 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Calculation Models for Droplet Impingement ‡ ‡ There are no known correlations suitable for predicting droplet impingement in power piping. Inc. As key parameters are unlikely to be known (e. All rights reserved. droplet size distribution)..g. 174 . it is doubtful that useful models yielding detailed results are possible.

velocities at various points of the system may be calculated and compared to the threshold velocity to produce a susceptibility ranking. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. As an alternative to a model.Calculation Models for Droplet Impingement ± Continued ‡ ‡ Approximate models for droplet impingement do exist ± see. Inc. 175 .

All rights reserved. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Two will be mentioned here: ± ASTM Model developed by Technical Committee G-2 ± Model of Frank Heymann¶s of Westinghouse Steam Turbine division.Droplet Impingement Models ‡ ‡ There are several models designed to predict the rate of droplet impingement. 176 .

Inc. All rights reserved.ASTM Model ‡ ASTM has developed a purely empirical model for predicting the maximum erosion rate and the incubation period. with less accuracy expected for field predictions. This model is described in the annual ASTM Book of Standards. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. This model is felt to be accurate to about a factor of 3 for laboratory data. 177 .

the velocity. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. This equation may is described on the next slide.6 mm. and the flux of droplets. All rights reserved.Heymann¶s Model ‡ ‡ Heymann developed a very simplified model designed to predict the rate of erosion. 178 . provided the droplets are greater than 0. The erosion rate is a function only of the material resistance. Inc.

047 Where: ± Ne = rationalized erosion rate = ratio of the volume lost per second to the volume of impinging liquid per second ± Re = normalized erosion resistance ± v = velocity in meters per second. Inc.41 ™ 10 ‡ 18 v 5. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 179 . All rights reserved.Heymann¶s Model ± Continued ‡ The model is written as: N e Re ! 6.

All rights reserved. 180 .6025 ™10 19 ‡ ‡ v 5. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. As no accuracy limits are stated. this model reduces to: N e ! 1.Heymann¶s Model for Carbon Steel ‡ For carbon steel.047 This correlation is based on steam velocity between 50 and 500 meters per second. Inc. this correlation should be used with caution.

if any. Inc. work has been done in this area.Materials Considerations ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ It has been found that materials respond similarly to cavitation erosion and droplet impingement. All rights reserved. Material response is completely different for solid particle erosion. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 181 . In fact. Flashing erosion is probably similar but little. materials are usually considered to behave identically.

182 .Correlating Damage ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Many investigators have attempted to correlate the degree of damage with material properties. See more. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. Inc. A different approach was taken by Heymann who plotted relative resistance to erosion versus material. In general. this work has met with limited success. This approach is a good screening method.

ne l in le 6 . All rights reserved. Resistance of Materials 183 u le r u le ta te l li te 6.or 100 0 .1 oo E P l te R I or e el 2 co In ss . Inc.1 10 1 ali e ro sio n R esista ic hr o e 30 0 er ie s ta er ie s ta ne lw el d ov er la ss in le ss In co in le l ee 00 st st ca ol te el on ar el © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Stellite. All rights reserved. 300 Series stainless steel will provide more resistance than carbon steel.g.Recommendations ‡ ‡ Based on information from the literature and from anecdotal sources. the following materials should provide improved resistance to erosion: ± Inconel ± Duplex stainless steel ± Hard facing ± e.. Norem. but less resistance than those on the above list. 184 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.

All rights reserved.g.Repair Considerations ‡ Some repair options include: ± Replacement in kind ± Replacement with a more resistant material ± Local repair with an overlay or a patch of resistant material ± Local redesign ± e. target tee. heavier wall fittings. Inc. 185 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute..

Some of the properties that have been used include: ± Hardness ± Tensile strength ± Ultimate strength © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc.Correlating Damage ‡ ‡ Many workers have attempted to correlate the erosion resistance of material with physical properties. 186 . All rights reserved.

Continued ‡ ‡ These attempts have only succeeded in correlating damage within a narrow class. Recently.g. Inc. EPRI has sponsored work which has been more successful by correlating damage with the fatigue related parameters: ± Fatigue strength coefficient ± Cyclic strain-hardening exponent © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.. carbon steels. All rights reserved.Correlating Damage -. e. 187 .

Details are available in EPRI Reports ± ± EPRI Report TR-108943-V2 ± EPRI Report 1011231 Details are also available in technical papers cited in these references. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 188 . Inc.Correlating Damage -.Continued ‡ ‡ Good agreement has been demonstrated for a wide range of materials. All rights reserved.

As SPE has been extensively studied.. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. sand blasting to clean surfaces). All rights reserved.Solid Particle Erosion ± Introduction ‡ Solid particle erosion (SPE) occurs when a fluid stream containing particles impacts a surface causing damage. 189 . there is a large body of literature available.g. SPE is commonly encountered and is even used commercially (e.

the detailed mechanism of damage by SPE has not been determined. Apparently.Description of Mechanism ‡ ‡ Despite its inherent simplicity. Solid Impact Erosion. All rights reserved. ductile target materials behave differently than brittle materials. ‡ SPE is also called Particle Erosion. and Particle Impact Erosion © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. the exact damage mechanism depends on the material and the particles involved ± For example. 190 .

non-linear. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.Important Note ‡ It is very important to note that SPE and droplet impingement are not at all similar in terms of parametric effects including: ± Materials effects ± Velocity dependence ± power dependence and critical velocity ± Damage rate behavior ± linear vs. All rights reserved. Inc. 191 .

Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. There is a critical velocity below which SPE does not cause damage to surfaces. This velocity is quite low. normally about 3 feet per second (~ 1 m/s) for ductile materials. 192 .Impact of Velocity ‡ ‡ ‡ Velocity is a key parameter in SPE.

193 .Impact of Velocity .3 and 2. Investigators have found that the damage rate for ductile materials increase with the velocity to the power of between 2. Inc.4. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.004´ (100 microns). All rights reserved.Continued ‡ Damage to ductile materials from SPE will occur if the velocity is above the threshold velocity and the particles are greater than about 0.

± Rippled surfaces are possible at small angles of attack on a ductile material. Surfaces may be rough or polished. All rights reserved.Morphology ‡ Surface damages by SPE exhibit a variable morphology depending on the material. and grooving may occur. Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. the properties of the particles and the fluid velocity. 194 .

Damage Caused by Solid Particle Erosion Valve Internals Damaged by Solid Particle Erosion photos courtesy of Dominion Virginia Power © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved. 195 .

All rights reserved. 196 . Inc.Damage Caused by Solid Particle Erosion Turbine Blades Damaged by Solid Particle Erosion © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Inc. photo courtesy of Constellation Energy © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 197 . All rights reserved.Solid Particle Erosion in a Steam Generator Blo do n Line Note the rippled surface.

± Service water systems ± the particles are silt and/or sand contained in the water. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Note the critical velocity is small enough that damage occurs even in service water and related systems. 198 . Inc.Where to Look for Damage ‡ Damage caused by SPE is often found in: ± Steam generator blowdown ± the particles are corrosion products from the steam generator. All rights reserved.

All rights reserved. ultrasonic methods should use 100% scans or finer grids than are used for FAC inspections.Inspection Considerations ‡ ‡ Radiographic. As degradation caused by SPE is normally quite localized. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ultrasonic or visual techniques may be used to locate damaged areas. Inc. 199 .

200 . Depending on conditions. Inc. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved. for commonly used piping materials there is a much smaller difference in resistance than compared to the other mechanisms. See figure on next slide.Materials Considerations ‡ It is important to note that the material resistance characteristics of SPE are completely different than other erosive mechanisms discussed in this module.

00 0.20 0.00 1.e.80 1.Material Resistance to Solid Particle Erosion tellite 6 tellite 0 16 0 tainles s tainles s tainles s Inc onel 600 Inc olo 800 Inc onel 6 1 ild teel 0.20 Re la ti e Erosion Re sista nce a re d to S te llite For conditions of severe erosion (i. 201 .. All rights reserved. Inc. 0 0. high velocit ) © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.60 o 0.

Materials Considerations . there is no material solution to problem. Inc.Continued ‡ ‡ ‡ Based on these data for severe conditions. Probably 300 series stainless is the best replacement material available for piping systems. All rights reserved. Redesign may be necessary in particularly bad situations. 202 . © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

203 .Countermeasures The methods to reduce damage due to SPE include: ‡ Reducing velocity by increasing the pipe size or redesign ‡ Using target tees or similar approaches ‡ Reduce particle loading by ± Cleaning upstream ± Filtering/separation ‡ Using more resistant material. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.

particle material. 204 . More about models. material are some of the input requirements. geometry.Calculation Models and Parametric Trends ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ There are empirical models available to predict the rate of SPE. All rights reserved. Inc. These models may be useful under certain circumstances. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Fluid velocity. particle size.

For More Information ‡ EPRI Report 1011231 for a treatment of SPE in piping systems. All rights reserved. Inc. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. ‡ EPRI Report TR-108943-V2 has a treatment of SPE in steam turbines. 205 . ± This report also contains a number of relevant references.

e. particle concentration.Parameters The parameters influencing SPE may be conveniently divided into three categories. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. hardness. All rights reserved. and friability (i. Target Material Variables ± all material properties including. melting point. work hardening behavior. Inc.. ‡ Impingement Variables including ± particle velocity. and microstructure. hardness. particle size distribution.Solid Particle Erosion . the ease of fracture). Particle Variables including ± particle shape. angle of incidence. 206 . particle rotational speed.

± Note that this is a much lower critical velocity than for droplet impingement © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Critical velocity ± the critical velocity (above which damages occurs) is normally taken to be 3 feet/second (1 meter per second) for ductile materials. Inc.4. 207 . All rights reserved.3 and 2.Parametric Effects ‡ ‡ Velocity ± the erosion rate for ductile materials varies as the velocity raised to a power between 2.

Continued ‡ Impact angle ± the amount of damage is a function of impacting angle.Parametric Effects . Inc. All rights reserved. 208 . The damage profile depends on whether the material is ductile or brittle. ‡ ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Note that intermediate behavior (not shown on the graph) is possible for materials that are not easily characterized. See chart on next slide.

All rights reserved. 209 . Inc.Influence of Impact Angle on SPE © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

004´]. All rights reserved. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Experiments have shown that the damage for ductile materials is essentially linear with time. 210 . Inc.Parametric Effects . the erosion rate decreases rapidly with decreasing particle size below 100 microns.Continued ‡ Particle Size ± the size of the erodent particle has little effect on the erosion rate of ductile materials as long as the particle size is above about 100 microns [i.e.. 0.

e. Inc. micro-machining) of the surface by impacting particles. 211 .Most Commonly Used Models ‡ Two commonly cited models to predict the rate of solid particle erosion are: ± Finnie ± erosive wear as a consequence of the cutting (i. All rights reserved. © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.. ± Hutchings ± erosive wear occurs as a result of material being plowed out by the impacting particles.

e. All rights reserved.. the information needed to model the impacting particles is normally unknown. particle size distribution. the available models are not applicable to piping geometries..g. e.Practical Limitations of SPE Models ‡ In power plant environments. Inc. ‡ © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Further. particle loading.g. 212 . elbows.

213 . All rights reserved. Inc.Cavitation Erosion Damage to Pump Impellors © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

Control Valve Trim Damaged by Cavitation © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. 214 . Inc. All rights reserved.

Inc. All rights reserved. 215 .Cavitation Damage in a Globe Valve © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

216 . Inc.Pipe Sho ing Extensive Cavitation Damage © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. All rights reserved.

Inc. All rights reserved. 217 .Erosion Damage in a Dump Valve Note the damage was caused by leakage. photos courtesy of Southern Nuclear © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute.

218 .Droplet Impingement Damage in a MSR Pocket Drain photo courtesy of Constellation Energy © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved.

219 .SPE in a Valve Body Valve was located in the steam generator blowdown system. photo courtesy of Bruce Power © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. All rights reserved.

WHOLLY OR IN PART. OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT. call the EPRI Customer Assistance Center at 800. OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. ANY MEMBER OF EPRI. METHOD. EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION. Inc. IT IS AVAILABLE ONLY UNDER LICENSE FROM EPRI AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED. INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE. OR (III) THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE. OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS DOCUMENT. . PROCESS. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI. PROCESS.com. EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. NOTE For further information about EPRI. NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER. Inc. OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS. Copyright © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute. INC.3774 or e-mail askepri@epri.313. ACCORDINGLY. All rights reserved. BY ANY LICENSEE TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR ORGANIZATION. APPARATUS. THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW. METHOD. Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute. INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. APPARATUS. (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION. ANY COSPONSOR. ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS DOCUMENT EPRI Solutions NOTICE: THIS REPORT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THAT IS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF EPRI.

The report is a corporate document that should be cited in the literature in the following manner: Computer-Based Training Module on Erosion in Piping Systems. . CA: 2006. 1013570.CITATIONS This report was prepared by EPRI Solutions 1661 Page Mill Rd Palo Alto. EPRI. Taylor This report describes research sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). CA 94304 Principal Investigator J. Palo Alto. Horowitz T.

you and your company acknowledge that this assessment is solely for informational purposes and not for reliance purposes. citizen or permanent U. All rights reserved.S. Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of the Electric Power Research Institute. Inc. nonprofit center for public interest energy and environmental research. North Carolina.S. Palo Alto. with major locations in Palo Alto. and environment.S. participants. In the event you are uncertain whether you or your company may lawfully obtain access to this EPRI Intellectual Property. resident is permitted access under applicable U. Although EPRI may make available on a case-by-case basis an informal assessment of the applicable U. you acknowledge that it is your obligation to consult with your company¶s legal counsel to determine whether this access is lawful. The Electric Po er Research Institute (EPRI) The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Program: Nuclear Power 1013570 ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 3420 Hillview Avenue. or foreign export laws or regulations.313. including health. EPRI brings together members. and use.com ‡ www. and Charlotte.2121 ‡ askepri@epri. You and your company acknowledge that it is still the obligation of you and your company to make your own assessment of the applicable U.com .epri. International participation represents nearly 15% of EPRI¶s total research. Together«Shaping the Future of Electricity © 2006 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). California.Export Control Restrictions Access to and use of EPRI Intellectual Property is granted with the specific understanding and requirement that responsibility for ensuring full compliance with all applicable U.855. and foreign export laws and regulations is being undertaken by you and your company. export classification and ensure compliance accordingly. Inc. the Institute¶s scientists and engineers. and other leading experts to work collaboratively on solutions to the challenges of electric power. delivery.S.S. export classification for specific EPRI Intellectual Property. was established in 1973 as an independent.3774 ‡ 650. Palo Alto. California 94304-1395 ‡ PO Box 10412. and demonstration program.S. EPRI¶s members represent over 90% of the electricity generated in the United States. and foreign export laws and regulations. This includes an obligation to ensure that any individual receiving access hereunder who is not a U. development. California 94303-0813 ‡ USA 800.S. safety. These solutions span nearly every area of electricity generation. You and your company understand and acknowledge your obligations to make a prompt report to EPRI and the appropriate authorities regarding any access to or use of EPRI Intellectual Property hereunder that may be in violation of applicable U.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful