# Game Theory

Basic Ideas of Game Theory 

Game theory is the general theory of strategic behavior.
y Generally depicted in mathematical form. y Plays an important role in modern economics.

Rules, Strategies, Payoffs, and Equilibrium 

Economic situations are treated as games.
y The rules of the game state who can do what, and when they can do it. y A player's strategy is a plan for actions in each possible situation in the game.

Rules, Strategies, Payoffs, and Equilibrium 

Economic situations are treated as games.
y A player's payoff is the amount that the player wins or loses in a particular situation in a game. y A players has a dominant strategy if that player's best strategy does not depend on what other players do.

Nash Equilibrium 

Occurs when each player's strategy is optimal, given the strategies of the other players.
y A player's best response (or best strategy) is the strategy that maximizes that player's payoff, given the strategies of other players. y A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which each player makes his or her best response.

Prisoner's Dilemma 

Famous example of game theory.
y Strategies must be undertaken without the full knowledge of what other players will do. y Players adopt dominant strategies, but they don't necessarily lead to the best outcome.

Prisoner¶s Dilemma

CLYDE Confess Not Confess Confess BONNIE Not Confess
8 years for Bonnie and 1 year for Clyde 4 years each 1 year for Bonnie and 8 years for Clyde 3 years each

Bonnie¶s Decision Tree

If Clyde Confesses
Bonnie Confess 4 Years in Prison Best Strategy Not Confess 8 Years in Prison

If Clyde Does Not Confess
Bonnie Confess 1 Year in Prison Best Strategy Not Confess 3 Years in Prison

Economic Applications of Game Theory
Cheating on a cartel  Trade wars between countries  Advertising  Games without dominant strategies 

Cheating on a Cartel 

Cartel members' possible strategies range from abiding by their agreement to cheating.
y Cartel members can charge the monopoly price or a lower price. y Cheating firms can increase profits. y The best strategy is charging the low price.

Cheating on a Cartel
PepsiCo
Cheat on Cartel (Charge Low Pri e) Don¶t Cheat (Charge Monopol Pri e) Coke earns \$ million Pepsi earns \$2 million

Coca Cola

Cheat on Cartel

\$ million each

Don¶t Cheat

Coke earns \$2 million Pepsi earns \$ million

\$6 million each

Decision Tree for the Coca Cola Company
If Pepsi Charges the Low Price
Coke Low Price Monopoly Price \$3 million Best Strategy \$2 million

If Pepsi Charges the Monopoly Price
Coke Low Price Monopoly Price \$8 million \$6 million

Best Strategy

y Imposing tariffs can be a dominant strategy and establish a Nash equilibrium even though it may be inefficient.

Effects of a Tariff on Japanese Televisions
Price to Buyers with a Tariff P Supply of Japanese Televisions to U.S. Market

\$350 \$100 Tariff \$300 Price with No Tariff \$250 Price to Sellers with a Tariff A B C E U.S. Demand for Japanese Televisions 600 800 Televisions (thousands per year) Q

Japan
Tari N Tari \$9 f r U.S. \$4 f r Japan \$8 ac

Unit d Stat

Tari

5 ac \$4 f r U.S. \$9 f r Japan

N Tariff

Decision Tree for the United States
If Japan Imposes a Tariff
United States Tariff Free Trade \$5 million \$4 million \$9 million \$8 million Tariff Free Trade

If Japan Does Not Impose a Tariff
United States

The prisoner's dilemma applies to advertising.
y All firms advertising tends to equalize the effects. y Everyone would gain if no one advertised.

Maxwell H u e

Folger¶s

\$0 each

\$4 for Folger·s -\$5 for Maxwell House \$1 each

-\$5 for Folger·s \$4 for Maxwell House

Games Without Dominant Strategies 

In many games the players have no dominant strategy.
y Often a player's strategy depends on the strategies of others. y If a player's best strategy depends on another player's strategy, he has no dominant strategy.

A Game With No Dominant Strategy
Pa
Confess Not Confess 5 years for Ma 3 years for Pa years for Ma 2 years for Pa

Ma

Confess

6 years for Ma 1 year for Pa years for Ma 0 years for Pa

Not Confess

Ma¶s Decision Tree

If Pa Confesses Ma Confess Not Confess 6 Years in Prison Best Strategy 8 Years in Prison

If Pa Does Not Confess Ma Not Confess Confess 4 Years in Prison 5 Years in Prison Best Strategy

Multiple Equilibria 

Some games have more than one Nash equilibrium.

Multiple Equilibria 

Multiple Nash equilibria means game theorists require extra information to predict what will happen when playing the game.

Payoffs in a Game with Multiple Equilibria
Mark
Party Movie Eac l s s 2 units Car l n ts unit ark ts 2 units

Carolyn

Party

Car l n ark Eac

ts 2 units ts unit ts 2 units

Movie

Sequential Games and Credibility 

Some games are sequential.

Sequential Games and Credibility 

A sequential game is a game in which players make at least some of their decisions at different times.

Sequential Games and Credibility 

When the players are a monopoly and a new firm, the new firm faces a number of decisions beginning with whether to enter the industry.

Sequential Games and Credibility
Entry decision determines which side of the decision tree is applicable.  In the second half of the game, the monopoly has the dominant strategy. 

Sequential Games and Credibility
A subgame perfect Nash equilibrium is a Nash equilibrium in which every player's strategy is credible.  No player makes incredible threats. 

A Sequential Game
New Firm Chooses

New Firm Enters Monopoly Chooses High Price Monopoly gets \$3, New firm gets \$2 Low Price

New Firm Does Not Enter Monopoly Chooses High Price Low Price Monopoly gets \$2, New firm gets \$0

Monopoly gets Monopoly gets \$0, New firm \$5, New firm gets ²\$1 (\$ millions) gets \$0

Payoffs in a Sequential Game of Entry

New Firm
Enter o Not Enter Monopoly gets \$5 New firm gets \$0 Monopoly gets \$2 New firm gets \$0

Monopol

i h Price Low Price

Monopoly gets \$3 New firm gets \$2 Monopoly gets \$0 New firm gets ±\$1

Commitments 

Commitments are valuable.

The Benefit of Commitments 

People can benefit from being able to limit their future actions so that they cannot do what they would want to do in the future.

The Benefit of Commitments 

A person commits to a future action if they do something now to limit future options or change future incentives so that they will have an incentive to take that action in the future.

The Benefit of Commitments 

Commitments can provide valuable benefits by restricting future choices in a way that changes other people's actions to one's own benefit.

Commitment Mechanisms
Committing to future action is often difficult.  The law, social pressures, etiquette, promises and honor all contribute to helping people commit. 

Excess Capacity as Commitment 

A monopoly firm·s excess capacity may deter the entry of a new firm.

Game With Monopoly Investing in Additional Capacity
New Firm Chooses

New Firm Enters Monopoly Chooses High Price Monopoly gets \$3, New firm gets \$2 Low Price

New Firm Does Not Enter Monopoly Chooses High Price Low Price Monopoly gets \$4, New firm gets \$0

Monopoly gets Monopoly gets \$4, New firm \$5, New firm gets ²\$3 (\$ millions) gets \$0

Commitment in Other Games
Factors such as the capacity to produce help firms honor commitments.  Firms can commit to future actions by convincing government to regulate them. 

Repeated Games 

A repeated game is a game that the same players play more than once.

Repeated Games
Repeated games differ form one-shot games because people's current actions can depend on the past behavior of other players.  Cooperation is encouraged. 