Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objective
To analyze a power plate arrangement y Come up with a mathematical model y Determination of model parameters y Vibration response of the developed mathematical model y Simulation of results y Experimental validation
y
The System
Isolator
Unbalance
Components
Consists of a panel supported on four diamond shaped isolators y Panel bounded by noise absorbers
y
Harmonic excitation
Two motors having unbalances Semicircular discs- 4 nos. on each side
Mathematical Model
y
F0 ! u[ 2
y
Assumptions
y
Both motors running in phase y Rigid mounting is assumed for isolators. y Assuming perfect isolation by isolators.
y
Parameters
y
Estimation
y
Mass
Mass of the panel assembly, m = 37.5kg
Stiffness
Force deflection method Applied wt, f = 15kgf Deflection, d= 7mm K= f/d =21021.4 N/m
Continue.. Continue..
y
Damping factor
Logarithmic decrement method
\ 1 X0 ! 2T ln n Xn 1\ 2
Estimated damping
\ ! .15
Continue
y
Excitation force
Forced excitation due to unbalance Mass of the semicircular disc, m = 155g Eccentricity = CG of disc, rc ! 4r 3T Unbalance , u = mrc = .00329kgm Low setting 4 discs causing unbalance per motor High Setting 8 discs causing unbalance per motor Excitation force, F0 ! u[ 2
Analysis
Steady state response X r y e! where
y
2 2 2 1 2 2
r!
1 r
2\ r
[ p
Results
The response for various settings of the system were obtained y Sample result
y
M = 37.5kg K = 21021.4N/m \ ! .15 u = .00329kgm w = 40Hz The Steady state response, X = .726mm
Results..
Continue
Experimental Setup
y y
Objective:
Vibration response measurement
The apparatus:
Accelerometer Charge amplifier Oscilloscope
Accelerometer
Fixed on the panel centre using magnet
Observations
Low Setting
Sl Frequency, No: w(Hz) 1 2 3 4 30 35 40 50 Response (mV) 60.8 53.6 50.7 47.8 Response Theoretical (mm) Response(mm) .608 .536 .507 .478 .746 .734 .726 .717
High Setting
Sl Frequency, No: w(Hz) 1 2 3 4 30 35 40 50 Response (mV) 176.2 164.3 154.7 146.5 Response Theoretical (mm) response(mm) 1.762 1.643 1.547 1.465 1.492 1.468 1.452 1.434
Experimental result
Response Volt
Sample result
w = 40Hz y M = 37.5kg F0 ! 8u[ 2
y
1.20E-01 1.00E-01 8.00E-02 6.00E-02 4.00E-02 2.00E-02 0.00E+00 -2.00E-02 -4.00E-02 -6.00E-02 -8.00E-02 -1.00E-01
Response Volt
Response Volt
w = 40Hz y M=100kg
y
F0 ! 8u[ 2
Conclusion
Experimental results were matching with the mathematical model. y The presence of man on the machine causes asymmetry disrupting the basics of the model y Small phase differences in the motors are not causing considerable change in response. y Higher values of the phase lag causes asymmetry
y
Thank You