Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Integration Management
Visit hrmba.blogspot.com for more presentations, project reports, notes etc.
Topics covered
Mergers and Acquisitions: Importance and Reasons for Failure People related problems that led to Financial underperformance Due Diligence What to look for in Due Diligence Why are people neglected during M&A ? HR integration - Stages, challenges and Solution Case Study DaimlerChrysler
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
Merger Integration: Why the Soft Issues Matter Most, Bain & Co, 2003
Acquisitions that ought to have been successful according to business criteria failed because of neglect of the human factors involved. Failure to tackle the people issues, such as retaining top talent and communicating effectively with the workforce, is one of the reasons why the majority of deals fail to meet expectations.
Tying the Corporate Knot- Effects of Merging companies with markedly different HR practices were three times Mergers and Acquisitions , American more likely to have significant productivity and turnover problems. Mgmt Association, 1989
HR Due Diligence
Acquisitions Horizons study, 1980s, cited in Price Pritchett, After the Merger: Managing the Shockwaves
The 2 top most reasons cited for the underperformance of mergers and acquisitions were 1) management talent in the acquired company was not as deep as expected 2) key talent left the firm.
85% of mergers and acquisitions underperformed due to differing management attitudes and culture. Delivering the Benefits of Mergers and Acquisitions, Coopers & Lybrand,1996. 80% of mergers and acquisitions underperformed due to a lack of integration and planning. 45% of mergers and acquisitions underperformed as a result of poor management practices at the acquired company.
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
Involves consideration of differences in the corporate culture of the companies and identifying issues critical to integration
HR Due Diligence
Wider the cultural gap, more difficult will be the merger and more crucial will be the diligence phase
HR Due Diligence
Compliance
Risks in Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
Workforce Assessment
Obtain headcount allocations for each category. Is the organization structure efficient or flabby. What is the headcount requirement of the merged organization for each job category. Do a skills requirement study. For example:
Technical qualifications for trade or technical organization. Soft skills for service oriented organization.
HR Due Diligence
Remuneration
Critical, because large amount of time and money is expended. Obtain remuneration data and compare with the labor market position for the industry. Underpaid staff need to be brought to industry standards, not possible at one go Overpaid staff need to be realigned sensitively. Bonus schemes: Realign criteria for incentives in the new entity.
HR Due Diligence
personnel.
Minimal analysis of labor relations could ignore history of
labor conflicts.
A new management team could be required if target
could be required and initially committed promise of not downsizing will be breached, leading to an atmosphere of mistrust.
If analysis of compensation practice is insufficient and target
company has generous packages, there could be a post merger exodus of talent.
If target company s management practices and culture is not
analyzed adequately, the acquirer may be unprepared for the extent of effort required for the cultural integration exercise.
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
Stage 1- Pre-Combination
HR Issues HR Implications and Actions
Identifying reasons for the M & A Forming M & A team/leader Searching for potential partners Selecting a partner Planning for managing the process of the M and/or A Planning to learn from the process
Knowledge and understanding need to be disseminated Leadership needs to be in place Composition of team impacts success Systematic and extensive pre-selection and selection are essential Conducting thorough due diligence of all areas is vital Cultural assessment Planning for combination minimizes problems later Creating practices for learning and knowledge transfer
HR Due Diligence
HR Issues
Selecting the integration manager Designing/implementing teams Creating the new structure/strategies/ leadership Retaining key employees Motivating the employees Managing the change process Communicating to and involving stakeholders Deciding on the HR policies and practices
Selecting the appropriate candidate Creating team design and selection are critical for transition and combination success Communicating is essential Deciding on who stays and goes Establishing a new culture, structure, and HR policies and practices is essential
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
Unfreeze Change Refreeze Kubler-Ross Formula for change ADKAR Dynamic conservatism The role of the management The constructionist principle (reflection, advocacy, inquiry) Scenario Planning Theory U of Otto Scharmer
HR Due Diligence
Productivity drops by 50% Leadership attrition soars 47% within 3 years Employee satisfaction drops 14% 90% of high-tech mergers fail to deliver expected increases 80% of employees begin to feel management cares more about financials than product quality or people
HR Due Diligence
Assessing the concerns of stakeholders The new entity must learn Revising as needed Learning from the process
HR Due Diligence
Creating transition teams Overseeing the communications Managing the learning processes Re-casting the HR department itself
HR Due Diligence
Industry knowledge Competitor understanding Financial understanding Global perspective/knowledge Strategic visioning Partner orientation Multiple stakeholder sensitivity Merger and acquisition knowledge
Strategic analysis Managing cultural diversity Creator of learning culture Planning skills Adaptability Learning facilitator Value shaper
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
The German part dominated the post-merger integration structure of the DaimlerChrysler AG. Both companies prepared themselves for a merger. Pre-merger preparations:
First negotiations in 1995 PEOPLE: Chairmen, because of different expectations POWER: Chances at Daimler vs. Fears at Chrysler PURPOSE: maintain strength in technology vs. R&D investments and new markets
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
The crucial point in the cultural differences was the Business Culture. National Culture influence e.g. attitudes to work, authority and equality. Working late hours vs. Working on deadlines Command lower-levels vs. Discuss with lower-levels Business Culture was what was critical, which was different in terms of organization structures, working styles, compensation schemes etc. STORIES: Rich successful engineering heritage vs. Self-made upcoming company SYMBOLS: Executive assistants vs. No convention, equality POWER: Chairman vs. Charismatic Executives ORGANIZATION: Hierarchic, bureaucratic Holding vs. Intuitive cross-functional structure CONTROL: Compensation schemes ROUTINES & RITUALS: Late hours vs. Deadlines; formal vs. informal It evolved to the dominant German culture. German Engineering vs. Cowboy Independence Compromises instead of digital decision Pick a spot in the middle
HR Due Diligence
The revolutionary strategic change was managed by an interventional / directional approach. REVOLUTION as style of strategic change. Transformation Big Bang. Daimler tried an interventional approach although it was a directive managing style right from the beginning. Intervention, Stallkamp as change agent Fear of manipulation & resistance Direction, Hold on Crisis became obvious
HR Due Diligence
Recommendation
No announcement as merger of equals . Beware of national differences which can effect the business culture. Observing business cultures better and digital decision right from the beginning.
HR Due Diligence
HR Due Diligence
HR +
= HR Rocks
HR Due Diligence