Professional Documents
Culture Documents
May 2006
deeper
Agenda
Logistics providers need to reinvent their business model in order to meet buyers more demanding requirements
Executive Summary
More demanding requirements Buyers are seeking consistent global capability to provide greater reliability at lower total cost. This requires managing trade-offs between cost of inventory, transport, and storage. This calls for end-to-end integration, more tightly engineered synchronization, industry specialization, and optimization. This implies deep integration with buyers and partners across people, processes, information, and cash flow Most providers over promise and under deliver. The business model of most providers trap them by failing to generate returns which will allow them to meet buyer demands
Market shapers will develop shared user offerings which will be difficult for buyers to substitute. They will develop componentized solutions to increase returns, and will move away from country-centric to global line of business profit & loss management as portfolio managers. Tighter integration delivers greater value and increased lock-in across the network. Success will be measured by how well they increase reliability and reduce total cost
Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Contents
Executive summary Industry Overview Five Drivers of change Future industry picture Implications for industry participants Appendix
The provider business model is evolving to offer greater scope and deeper integration
Key Attributes of Freight Logistics Roles
Service Offerings Outsourcing Models
Supply Chain Integrator (SCI) or Lead Logistics Manager (LLM) or Global Trade Orchestrator Lead Logistics Provider (LLP) Lead Logistics
Incremental Attributes
Broad supply chain expertise Knowledge and information-based Inventory minimization End to end network optimization Advanced integrated technology Adaptive, flexible and collaborative Total transport planning Operate and buy logistics services Project manage network improvements Single point of contact: total wallet Limited technology integration with client
Relationship
Pricing
Contractual
Inc
Value-Added
Integration limited to transport with Third-Party warehousing Logistics Provider Limited geographical reach (3PL) Freight Forwarders Multi-modal transport management
Contractual
Foundation Services
Source: Adapted from Third-Party Logistics Results and Findings of the 2004 Ninth Annual Study. Authors are C. J. Langley, Georgia Institute of Technology, G. R. Allen, Capgemini, and T. A. Dale, FedEx Supply Chain Services, Inc. 5 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
The untapped prize is to reduce the inventory carrying costs currently over twenty percent of total logistics cost
2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0
Global Freight Logistics Market: US$ 2.7 trillion (~7% of global GDP)
Total Size ~ US$ 1.2 trillion
139 108 750
US$ (billions)
Air Freight, $56B Water-Other, $76B Ocean-Container Shipping Lines (CSL) Rail Freight Road Freight Freight Forwarding (FF) Parcels
675
In-house Logistics
Distribution / Warehousing
Transportation
Margins between services vary, but the highest rewards for market share gains lie in activities driven by economies of scale
Potential Scale Economies in Outsourced Logistics
Asset free Supply Chain Mgr Asset Supply Chain Mgr
High
Parcel carrier
Complexity
Low Low
Source: IBM BCS analysis 7 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Scale Potential
High
The level of returns in this industry make it relatively hard to attract capital
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Operating Margin comparison
30% 25% Industry Average Operating Margin : 8.1% CH Robinson Wincanton Expeditors
20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0% -5% -10% Operating Margin (EBITDA/Total Revenues) Kuehne & Nagel Exel Kintetsu Geodis EGL Nippon 5% Hays TNT
UPS
Toll K&S FedEx UTI Weighted Average Cost of Capital: 10.9% Yamato Deutsche Post Christian Salvasen 10% 15% 20% 25% Industry Average ROIC: 10.7% Patrick
Notes: ROIC and Operating Margins are average values calculated for the latest five years. ROIC is defined as Net Income/Total Capital. Industry Averages are the simple averages of all players plotted on the graph. Weighted Average Cost of Capital is based on US Industry Average Source IBM BCS analysis, Thomson Financial for financial data, WACC data from Ibbotson & Associates 8 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Contents
Executive Summary Industry Overview Five Drivers of Change Future Industry Picture Implications for Industry Participants Appendix
7. Optimization
Source: IBM BCS analysis 10 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Global Sourcing
India China Mexico Brazil Poland Taiwan France Singapore Japan USA Germany UK 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 43 113 311 383 1024 1168 1927 1940 2675 2798 3225 3278 3600
Key Drivers
Competitive labour rates Availability of skills Favourable Tax rates Low Duty rates
Constraints
Reliable transport and infrastructure Uncertainty drives up inventory as safety stock is increased
The boundaries of the opportunity space are slowly widening . but not as fast as investors have been promised
Customer Relationship Linkages
Product Development Product Management
Customer Fulfilment
Supply Chain Strategy
Distribution
Network and Asset Configuration Distribution Oversight
Manufacturing
Manufacturing Strategy Manufacturing Oversight
Supply
Strategic Sourcing Supplier Relationship Management
Strategy
Integrated S & OP
Distribution Planning
Manufacturing Planning
Supplier Planning
Customer Fulfilment
Execution
Manufacturing Procurement
Customer Directory
Product Directory
MES Data
Supplier/Materials Directory
Data
Performance Measurement
Traditional core candidates for outsourcing - Extend scope of outsourcing to transform? Either multi-sourced teams (in & out source) or total outsource Non-core - Probably already outsourced
Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
12
Integration
The extent of incorporating technology advances into logistics services may ultimately separate the winners from losers
Suppliers
Supply Chain
Flows: Product, Process, Information, Cash + Capital Management
Customer Channels
Stores Distribution Centers
Manufacturers
Plan
Source
Make Make
Deliver Deliver
Sell
Multiple channels and customer touch points
Single source dashboard to view overall performance Tracking from order to delivery Knowledge of total pipeline customer inventory
Standardized data definition, Key Performance Indicators & event monitoring for collaborative decision making
Distributed information Dozens of planning and execution systems Inaccurate information Slow moving information
Source: IBM BCS analysis 13 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt
EQUALS
Excess inventory Long lead times Excess manpower Deteriorated customer service Business performance uncertainty & risk
Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Speed of convergence may be limited by learning how to performance manage businesses with widely differing core competencies
Provider Segments
Freight Forwarding
Low
Core Competency
Buying
Source: IBM BCS analysis 14 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
The challenges faced by Providers makes the status quo unsustainable, and makes a compelling case for reinvention
Challenges
Profitably increasing scope and integration Realizing the inventory reduction prize Achieving scale economies Raising returns on capital
Drivers
More demanding buyer requirements Global sourcing Outsourcing envelope slowly widening End-to-End integration Consolidation and convergence
Model reinvented
15 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Contents
Executive Summary Industry Overview Five Drivers of Change Future Industry Picture Implications for Industry Participants Appendix
16
We expect the industry in 2015 to be more global, concentrated and segmented, and better at execution
2015
Limited number of global networks Segmented around buyer types Improved execution excellence
Global
Fortune 500 companies become more global businesses Logistics Providers follow the flag
Top 10 providers control more than 50% of the market The top provider controls around15%
~20% of buyers have large volumes (top 25 in the AMR list), are most demanding for specialized services, and global ~50% of buyers have medium volumes and are mostly continental in geographic reach ~30% of buyers are low volume and mostly national in geographic reach
Business processes are standardized and systems are integrated Better visibility of end-toend supply chain information and integration with partners and customers Effective & shared metrics to continuously measure performance Exception management through event monitoring Single view of customer
Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
17
The industry faces three distinct buyer segments: the battle will be for the middle ground
Logistics Buyer Segments
Increasing Scope and Integration of Offerings
Outsourced global, supply chain services Buy/manage end to end solutions: physical and technology Desire supply chain flexibility in terms of plug and play Shift to on demand business structures Desire greater visibility and reliability Gain lower costs, through scale of fewer providers Desire less complexity Focus on simplicity and standardization Some information integration and more value added services Keep in play specialized providers but switch frequently to lower prices Brands dont matter High level of operational efficiency provided by suppliers within the silos within which they service Sufficient understanding of visibility of pipeline and provider capabilities allows disintermediation of 3PLs and more use of foundation services
Buying type
Solution Buyers
Diversified Portfolio of Services, Specialized Segments
Foundation Services
Commodity Buyers
National Continental Global
Source: IBM BCS analysis 18 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
The Provider industry will eventually shake out to form three provider segments, each serving a buyer segment
Logistics Provider Segments
Able to deliver end-to-end supply chain integration and synchronization repeatedly for many global customers Drives standards that add value to buyers: data, visibility, ease of doing business, trade finance benefits etc. Able to support supply chain flexibility in terms of physical and IT application plug and play, which drives confidence in delivery capability Undertakes supplier management for buyers Likely to emerge as a consortium including a Lead Logistics Provider and other parties Good at acquiring scale and scope in new emerging parts of the world drives consolidation Acquire a broad range of capabilities; also drives consolidation Globally integrated offering seamless physical and information services Better at mass customization Deliver what they advertise Foundation service providers are more sought after than 3PLs Transport providers grow in scale and become more concentrated Very little product differentiation May be a highly specialized niche provider Geographic reach is mostly national May start by partnering with Lead Logistics Provider but end by being acquired by them
Provider Types
Solution Buyers
Source: IBM BCS analysis 19 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt
Buyer Types
Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Contents
Executive Summary Industry Overview Five Drivers of Change Future Industry Picture Implications for Industry Participants Appendix
20
Additionally, processes, systems, organization, and metrics must align with chosen segment strategy
Processes, Systems, Organization, and Metrics for Different Segments
Foundation & Value Added Services Providers Process
High standardization relatively limited customization options
Systems
Organization
Country based P&L Outsourcing of non-core processes Able to value customer knowledge
Sales and development teams able to sell benefits of standardization Able to reduce labor outlays by leveraging recruitment and onboarding skills Non core processes mostly outsourced Cost/Sales On-time delivery Profitability Fill rate Error rate Damage rate
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Profitability On-time delivery Fill rate Error rate Damage rate Cost/Sales
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
21
Although there is geographic variation, the retail industry is the largest user of in-house and outsourced logistics by value across all regions
Breakdown of Freight Logistics Industries Served by Geography (~14% excluded)
United States Europe Japan + China
Source: Datamonitor
Automotive
Hi-Tech
Pharmaceutical
Consumer Electronics
Consumer
22
Business
Automotive Hi Tech Pharma/health Aerospace Construction Agriculture
Asset
Asset Driven Energy Utilities Defence Aviation
Service
Financial Education Government Entertainment Business Services
End User Demand Driven Grocery Drinks White goods Brown goods Textiles DIY/Furniture Books/music/video
Of course, each industry buying segment also has its own unique freight logistics needs
Notes: Europe consists of UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway
Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Consolidation and convergence among providers is likely to continue as they try to improve capabilities and extend reach
Convergence Between 3PL and FF
Ocean Group which was a top FF with a presence in 3PL merged with Exel, a much bigger 3PL skewed towards the UK and US to form the combined Exel - 2000 Exel acquires Tibbett & Britten, the #3 3PL - 2003 Deutsche Post starts offering parcel and express services and acquires a 25% stake in DHL Express - 1998 Acquires leading FF and 3PL Danzas, also acquires airfreight provider AEI 1999 Acquires majority share in DHL Express 2002 Acquires Airborne Express - 2003 TNT Group, originally operating a mail and parcels business builds 3PL business with major acquisitions in USA and Italy enabling them to become highly innovative in automotive inbound supply chain. Introduced more IT in inbound supply chain and common collaborative layers - 1999 -2001 Broadens portfolio by acquiring FF Wilson Logistics - 2004 UPS Logistics Group to provide supply chain solutions is formed in 1995 Acquiring FF Fritz 2001 Acquires FF Menlo - 2004 Broadens portfolio with acquisition of LTL Overnite Express in 2005
RPS subdivision of Caliber Systems (acquired in 1998) re-branded as FedEx Ground in 2000 Acquires leading LTL American Freightways (AF) in 2001 and re-brands services offered by AF and prior acquisition Viking as FedEx Freight in 2002 Kuehne & Nagel establishes KN Lead Logistics to take on Lead Logistics Provider role - 2002
Source: Company Websites 23 Freight Logistics Point of View | 20050901-Freight-Logistics- POV Draft-v43.ppt Copyright IBM Corporation 2005
Agenda
24
Stage II
Core carriers Central purchasing with decentralized execution No compliance tracking Limited inbound freight controlled Electronic orders Manual with limited planning tools Decentralized Outbound only Manual routing guide for outbound and inbound Limited use of automation Dispatch and Delivery notification Limited use and reliance on EDI External Match and Pay Core Carriers Limited Performance monitoring
Stage III
Core carriers with volume commitments Central support and execution Compliance tracking Inbound freight fully integrated Automated load planning at the Entity level Centralized Inbound and outbound Automated carrier assignment No use of inbound carrier assignments in outbound planning Dispatch, shipment status, and delivery notification Integrated EDI Internal Match and Pay
Emerging
Carrier partnerships Use of electronic brokering
Shipment Planning
Manual Via Phone Based on carrier availability Vendors control inbound assignments Dispatch only Exception notification by customers Post Audit only
Automated carrier assignment using inbound carriers Continuous moves Integration of spot buy capabilities Proactive tracking and exception management Use of Internet Self Invoicing Working with Carrier community to reduce cost to serve
25