Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof.Paramita Malakar
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
Preferences
Income/ Budget
Social Factors
Personal Factors
Make preference : express our like or dislike Choice/Choose: select from the preferred alternatives that suit our budget
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
Utility
Utility: Satisfaction obtained from the consumption of the good and services preferred by consumer Anything that makes the consumer better off is assumed to raise his utility Anything that makes the consumer worse off will decrease his utility 1. Cardinal Approach: Utility can be measured in subjective unit 2.Ordinal Approach: Utility cant be measured but only rank Total Utility: Total satisfaction enjoyed from the consumption of good. More consumption lead greater utility Marginal Utility: Extra satisfaction a consumer can derive by consuming an extra unit of a good
04/14/12 Paramita/2010 6
The law of diminishing marginal utility, as defined by Alfred Marshall (1842-1924) states that Marginal utility of a good or service to anyone diminishes with every increase in the amount of it he / she already has
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
Cardinal Approach
Total Utility 1.The change in total utility from one more Burger . . .
6 Burger per day 3.Marginal utility falls as more Burger are consumed. Marginal Utility
Utils
50 38 33
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
10
1 2 3 4 5
04/14/12
50 38 33 25 0 -20
10 8 6 4 2
15 17 19 28 42 0
-3.33Paramita/2010 0
Equal Marginal Utilities per dollar for every goodThe Equilibrium condition
MUc/P1=MUb/P2=Mum
Marginal Utilities
Mum P
MU1
Quantity of Burger
MUc= Marginal Utility of Burger MUb= Marginal Utility of French-fries MUm = Marginal Utility of money P1= Price of Burger P2=Price of French-fries
12
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
13
Assumptions on Preferences
Rationality: Preferences are logically consistent or transitive among different alternatives. Completeness: Consumer would prefer a to b or indifferent between d & e Transitivity: Consumer would prefer c to a and a to b. Consumer would prefer c to b More is better than less : Generally feel that more is better
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
14
Preferred region d a b
Dominated region
a is preferred to all points in the dominated region but the consumer would prefer any point in the preferred region to a points like d and e involve more of one good and less of the other compared with a.
04/14/12
Quantity of Burger
Paramita/2010
15
Quantity of FFs
U2 A
C
04/14/12
a c b U1 U2
Violate assumption of consumer theory consumer would be indifferent among a, b and c But consumer would prefer c to b Quantity of Burger and French Fries more Give more utility
Quantity of Burger
04/14/12 Paramita/2010 17
cokes
IC1
IC0
IC
Pepsi
Perfect Substitute U( 04/14/12 x1,x2)= ax1+bx2 Slope=-a/b= Constant
Paramita/2010
Car
Perfect Complements Always consume together in fixed proportion U( x ,x )=min{ ax bx }
18
IC
IC1 IC0
Normal good
Bad good x1 x2 =0 04/14/12 = m/P1; Slope=Upward Sloping
Paramita/2010
Normal good
Neutral Good Slope= Vertical
19
m / P1
Slope = - P1/P2
Constraint Have to pay prices for the goods and services they buy Have limited funds to spend Budget constraint: combinations of goods and services the consumer can afford with a limited budget Mathematical expression: P1 * X 1+ P2 * X2 = m Where m is total income, P1 and P2 are prices for good X1 and good X2 respectively
Burger
04/14/12
m / P2
Paramita/2010
20
FFs
U1
U2 B
U3
where the budget line is at a tangent to an IC Points B and E are also affordable
C U3 E BL U1 Burger
04/14/12
U2
Paramita/2010
23
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
26
FFs 20
10
4
04/14/12 Paramita/2010
Burger
27
FFs
U1
Burger
Tracing out more of such points at different prices enables us to identify the Demand curve.
04/14/12 Paramita/2010 28
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
29
U2
U1 U2 H BL0 U1 BL1
The hypothetical budget line HH has the slope of the NEW relative prices and is tangent to the OLD indifference curve The SUBSTITUTION EFFECT is from E to D along U1U1 It is always negative a price decrease leads to a increase in demand
FFs
H E D
Burger
Paramita/2010 30
04/14/12
FFs
H E D
H BL0
04/14/12
Burger
Paramita/2010 31
10
10 5 2
04/14/12
J 5 8
4. The demand curve shows the quantity Max chooses at each price. Number of Burgers
32
Paramita/2010 32
In economics, demand is the desire to own anything and the ability to pay for it and willingness to pay. The term demand signifies the ability or the willingness to buy a particular commodity at a given point of time. Economists record demand on a demand schedule and plot it on a graph as an inverse (downward sloping) demand curve. The inverse curve reflects the relationship between price and quantity demanded: as price decreases, quantity demanded increases. The demand curve is equal to the marginal utility (benefit) curve. If there are no externalities, the demand curve is also equal to the social utility (benefit) curve
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
33
04/14/12
Paramita/2010
34