Strategic planning

Levels of Goals/Plans

A model of a prescriptive strategy process The prescriptive strategic process .

the process of finding a strategic fit betweenexternal opportunities and internal strengths while working around external threats and internal weaknesses .Strategic formulations ‡ Alternate strategies are formulated based onSituation Analysis.

Situational analysis SWOTOpportunities-Threats in environment Strengths-Weaknesses of organisation Strategy must synchronize opportunity with organisational capability Opportunity has no real value unless a company has the capacity to take advantage of that opportunity .

Criticisms of SWOT analysis Generates lengthy lists Uses no weights to reflect priorities Uses ambiguous words and phrases Same factor can be in 2 categories Requires only a single level of analysis No logical link to strategy implementation .

Not for you.Ways to improve on swot Generating a Strategic Factors Analysis Summary (SFAS) Matrix SFAS summarizes an organization s strategic factors by combining the external factors from the EFAS Table with the internal factors from the IFAS Table .

Not for you.TOWS Matrix illustrates how the external opportunities and threats can be matched with internal strengths and weaknesses to result in 4 possible strategic alternatives Provides a means to brainstorm alternative strategies Forces managers to create various kinds of growth and retrenchment strategies Used to generate corporate as well as business strategies .

Inc. ©2009 6-9 .Prentice Hall.

Strategic formulations at 3 level ‡ Corporate ‡ Business ‡ Functional .

business and functional strategies . same set of people perform corporate.Corporate strategies ‡ It mean strategies for enterprise consisting of more than one business and or company ‡ In small and medium organisations.

the manner in which management coordinates activities and transfers resources and cultivates capabilities among product lines and business units . stability.Corporate strategies ‡ It concern with the choice of direction of the group as a whole and the management of its business or product portfolioDirectional or markets in which the firm competes through its products and business unites Parenting strategy.the firm s overall orientation toward growth. or retrenchment Portfolio analysis.


Simplified Stages of Vertical Integration: Shaw Industries Polypropylene Fiber Production Carpet Manufacturing Retail Stores Raw Materials Manufacturing of final product Distribution Backward Integration Forward Integration .

International Entry Options for Horizontal Growth Exporting Licensing Franchising  Turn-key Operations  BOT Concept  Management Contracts Joint Venture Acquisitions Green-Field Development Production Sharing .

Stability Strategies.continuing activities without any significant change in direction Pause/Proceed with caution do nothing new in a worsening situation but instead to act as though the company s problems are only temporary Prentice Hall. Inc.continuance of current operations and policies Profit opportunity to rest before continuing a growth or retrenchment strategy No change strategy. ©2009 7-16 .

Retrenchment Strategies. Inc. ©2009 7-17 .stabilization of the new leaner corporation Prentice Hall.effort to quickly stop the bleeding across the board but in size and costs Consolidation.emphasizes the improvement of operational efficiency when the corporation s problems are pervasive but not critical Contraction.used when the firm has a weak competitive position in some or all of its product lines from poor performance Turnaround strategy.

Porter¶s Competitive Forces Potential new entrants Bargaining power of buyers Bargaining power of suppliers Threat of substitute products Rivalry among competitors .

The Five Forces Affecting Industry Competition .

management views its product lines and business units as a series of investments from which it expects a profitable return Popular portfolio analysis techniques include: BCG Matrix GE Business Screen .Portfolio strategy Portfolio analysis.

Portfolio strategy. many± Product lines or Business units ‡ Analysis is done through along two factors± Significance of industry in terms of growth rate of industry in % and ± significance of product or business unit in its industry in terms of market share derivative.BCG Matrix ‡ Applied to analyse and compare cos.known as relative competitive position ± relative competitive position is arrived by dividing its market share by that of the largest competitor.a value of more than 1 shows leadership .

©2009 7-22 .Prentice Hall. Inc.

new products with the potential for success but require a lot of cash for development Stars.products that bring in far more money than is needed to maintain their market share Dogs.BCG Matrix Question leaders at the peak of their product cycle and are able to generate enough cash to maintain their high market share and usually contribute to the company s profits Cash cows.products with low market share and do not have the potential to bring in much cash .

BCG Matrix.Limitations Use of highs and lows to form categories is too simplistic Link between market share and profitability is questionable Growth rate is only one aspect of industry attractiveness Product lines or business units are considered only in relation to one competitor Market share is only one aspect of overall competitive position .

profitability.5 ( very weak to very strong) ‡ 3.9 cell GE Business screen ‡ Developed by GE with help from Mc-Kinsey & plotting in 9 cells ‡ Plot firms future portfolio. steps‡ 1. brand image. pricing structure etc and rate industry on a scale of technological position.5 (very unattractive to very attractive) ‡ criteria to rate industry. In case of a gap between projected and desired portfolio.volume growth rate.take corrective actions . size. distribution network etc then rate product line or business on scale of key factors needed for success in each product line or business ± like market share.

©2009 7-26 .Prentice Hall. Inc.

©2009 7-27 .Limitations Complex and cumbersome Numerical estimates of industry attractiveness and business strength/competitive position give the appearance of objective.GE Business Screen. but are actually subjective judgments that can vary from person to person Cannot effectively depict the positions of new products and business units in developing industries Prentice Hall. Inc.

Advantages and Limitations of Portfolio Analysis Advantages: Encourages top management to evaluate each of the corporation s businesses individually and to set objectives and allocate resources for each Stimulates the use of externally oriented data to supplement management s judgment Raises the issue of cash flow availability to use in expansion and growth Prentice Hall. Inc. ©2009 7-28 .

Advantages and Limitations of Portfolio Analysis Limitations: Defining product/market segments is difficult Suggest the use of standard strategies that can miss opportunities or be impractical Provides an illusion of scientific rigor when in reality positions are based on objective judgments Value-laden terms such as cash cow and dog can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies Lack of clarity on what makes an industry attractive or where a product is in its life cycle Prentice Hall. Inc. ©2009 7-29 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful