Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

209 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- MSC Nastran 2012 Dynamic Analysis User’s Guide
- Mdnastran r3 Training 133b Course Notes
- Restart Nastran
- Panel Buckling
- MSC Nastran 2012 Linear Static Analysis User’s Guide
- NASTRAN Nonlinear Elements
- eBJSFM
- LM2001-2
- Concepts of Computational Finite Elements and Methods of Static and Dynamic Analyses in MSC.NASTRAN and LS/DYNA
- Finite Element Modelling Techniques in MSC NASTRAN and LS DYNA
- Msc Nastran 2014 Demo Problems
- Patran Slide Tutorial
- NASTRAN Glued Contact
- MSC.Nastran 2007 Implicit Nonlinear (SOL 600) User's Guide
- Advanced MSC.patran Exercises
- FEMCI - Random Vibration Specification Magnitude Equations
- mdnastran_r3_training_120_notes.pdf
- Optimization Applications Jack Castro
- Finite Element Modeling Techniques in MSC NASTRAN and LS DYNA[1]
- MSC Fastener Modeling for Joining Composite Parts 06-SpiritAero_Boshers

You are on page 1of 17

Craig L. Stevens Craig.Stevens@nasa.gov Mechanical Systems Analysis & Simulation Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland FEMCI Workshop Presentation May 6, 2004

Overview

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Introduction Problem Description Pre-Test Analysis Test Results Model Correlation Conclusions

Introduction

Mercury Laser Altimeter (MLA) on Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft MLA produces accurate measurements of topography and measures Mercury's wobble (due to the planet's libration) MESSENGER Objectives:

Determine the structure of Mercurys mantle and crust Investigate Mercury's polar caps Determine the state of Mercurys core (fluid or solid?)

MESSENGER developed by Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) MLA developed by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (Delivered to APL June 2003) Launch

August 2004 Delta II 2925H-9-5

Introduction

MESSENGER Configuration

Gamma-Ray Spectrometer

MLA

Plasma Spectrometer

Neutron Spectrometer Energetic Particles Spectrometer

X-Ray Spectrometer

Introduction

MLA Configuration

Z

Laser beam expander (Be) Laser bench (Be)

Y X

Mounting flexures [3] (Ti) Aft optics (Be)

Housing (Mg)

Problem Description

Flight laser bench with attached beam expander Three point mount: #2-56 fasteners Beam expander: mass ~0.4 lbm, height ~6.5

MLA laser workmanship level vibration test/analysis Low level: 0.04 G2/Hz, 6.8 GRMS

Task: Pre Test Analysis: Predict natural frequencies and loads Correlate FEM with test data Investigate test anomalies and determine cause FEM: 80002 80001 CQUAD4 model Fixed Base

V1 C1

80003

Z X Y 123456

Pre-Test Analysis

Initial joint stiffness estimated using tension joint theory Bolt:

Kb Eb AEff Lb

Load, #

Joint Diagram 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.0E+00

Bolt Fitting Preload

Preload = 250#

where, Eb = Bolt Youngs modulus Aeff = Bolt effective area Lb = Grip Ef = Fitting Youngs modulus D = Bolt diameter L = Clamped fitting thickness dw = Washer diameter a = Apex angle (assume 30o) Bolt carries 10% of applied load

Kf=1.1E+7#/in

1.0E-04 2.0E-04 3.0E-04 Deflection, in 4.0E-04 5.0E-04 6.0E-04

dw

L Lb

D

#2-56 Fastener

Pre-Test Analysis

Use Springs (CELAS) to model joint stiffness: Fitting stiffness = Kf/4 (9) Bolt stiffness = Kb (3) Normal constraints (center flange) = KNC (3) Normal constraints (near bolt) = KNCb (6) Normal constraint locations chosen based on aluminum engineering model test data Value of KNC and KNCb chosen based on aluminum engineering model test data and fitting stiffness Same order of magnitude as fitting stiffness 1E+7 #/in X and Y shear forces reacted through bolts using RBE2

2

Y

X

1 3

Pre-Test Analysis

Normal modes analysis:

MODAL EFFECTIVE MASS FRACTION: PRETEST

T1 T2 T3 MODE FREQ NO. (Hz) FRACTION SUM FRACTION SUM FRACTION SUM 1 509.8 2.14E-01 2.14E-01 4.65E-05 4.65E-05 6.76E-05 6.76E-05 2 518.3 4.05E-05 2.14E-01 2.13E-01 2.13E-01 3.77E-09 6.76E-05

Test Results

Z-axis: Test performed with no issues (no major modes) Y-Axis: Modal Frequencies Sine Signature Y

Item Analysis PreSine Y X Fn (Hz) Y Fn (Hz) 510 507 518 522

102

102

-2

100

10-3

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Frequency, Hz

10-2 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Frequency, Hz

Test Results

Y-axis (cont):

Harmonics observed in random beam expander responses Integer multiples of resonant frequency Indicates nonlinear response Not present in sine runs

ASD (G2/Hz)

Axis Y

Frequency Migration X Fn (Hz) Y Fn Test Pre Sine 507 -18 dB 500 -6 dB 444 Full Level 402 Post Sine 482

10 Beam Expander Y Response, 7.765 Grms Laser Bench Y Response, 1.055 Grms Controller Input, 0.853 Grms -18 dB Input Spec, 0.854 Grms

0.1

0.01

0.001

0.0001

0.00001

Test Results

Why do harmonics of resonant frequency exist?: Asymmetrical distortion of sine wave

Test Results

Frequency shifts observed in pre and post sine sweeps Modal frequencies drop over 10% Modal Frequencies X F (Hz) Item X and Y modes switch order

n

507 482

2

Pre Sine Y Post Sine Y

10

H12(f)

10-1 10-2

100

-2 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 10 200 Frequency, Hz

400

600

Model Correlation

Use MSC NASTRAN Solution 200 to correlate model and investigate frequency shift Assume linear modes and mode shapes Vary CELAS stiffnesses to investigate preload loss Key cards: MODTRAK: Performs cross orthagonality check to ensure proper modes meet constraints DEQATN: Create Least squares objective function formulation

2

Y X

1 3

For Post Sine Y correlation: W1 = 1.0 W2 = 1.0 fn2act = 451 Hz (Y Mode) fn1act = 482 Hz (X Mode)

Model Correlation

Results:

$ UPDATED DESIGN MODEL DATA ENTRIES $ DESVAR * 1NCS *D 1V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 2KB1 *D 2V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 3KF1 *D 3V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 4KB2 *D 4V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 5KF2 *D 5V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 6KB3 *D 6V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 7KF3 *D 7V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 8NCB1 *D 8V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 9NCB2 *D 9V 1.00000000E+10 DESVAR * 10NCB3 *D 10V 1.00000000E+10 7.72887313E+05 1.19993400E+06 9.05991600E+05 1.19993800E+06 3.37498700E+06 1.19594200E+06 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1V 2V 3V 4V 5V 6V

1.45899362E+05

8.14678800E+06 4.54948100E+06 1.00000000E+04

1.00000000E+04+D

1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D 1.00000000E+04+D

7V

8V 9V 10V

$ MODE TRACKING HAS BEEN PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY WITH SOME CHANGE IN THE MODE ORDER. $ ALL THE DRESP1 ENTRIES ASSOCIATED WITH MODE TRACKING ARE WRITTEN HERE FOR CONVENIENCE. $ DRESP1 101FN1 FREQ 2 DRESP1 102FN2 FREQ 1

Model Correlation

Results (Cont):

Item NCS KB1 KF1 KB2 KF2 KB3 KF3 NCB1 NCB2 NCB3 Initial 1.00E+07 1.20E+06 3.00E+06 1.20E+06 3.00E+06 1.20E+06 3.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 Post % change 7.73E+05 -92.3% 1.20E+06 0.0% 9.06E+05 -69.8% 1.20E+06 0.0% 3.37E+06 12.5% 1.20E+06 0.0% 1.46E+05 -95.1% 8.15E+06 -18.5% 4.55E+06 -54.5% 1.00E+04 -99.9%

2

Y

X

1

3

Over 90 % stiffness loss in fastener 3 (or 2) Preload ~0 Results from post test investigation verified no structural failure and no other significant source for frequency shift

Load, #

1.0E-04

2.0E-04

3.0E-04 Deflection, in

4.0E-04

5.0E-04

6.0E-04

Conclusions

Presence of harmonics in broadband responses indicative of nonlinearities in test data Optimizer is quick and efficient method to correlate modes and mode shapes of models Over 90% stiffness loss in fastener 2 or 3 Results indicate preload loss is the probable cause of frequency shift

References 1. Joseph Shigley. Mechanical Engineering Design. Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York. 1989 2. Thomas Sarafin. Design and Analysis of Fastened Joints for Aerospace Engineers. Course Notes. Instar Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 2001. 3. John H. Bickford. Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York 4. Ryan Simmons. MLA Laser Subassembly Workmanship Vibration Post-Test Report. NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland, 2003. MLA-RPT-000127 5. Steven W. Smith. The Scientist and Engineers Guide to Digital Signal Processing, 2nd Edition. California Technical Publishing, San Diego, California, 1999. 6. Scott Gordon. Private Correspondence. NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland. 7. Daniel Kaufman. Private Correspondence. NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland.

- MSC Nastran 2012 Dynamic Analysis User’s GuideUploaded byMSC Nastran Beginner
- Mdnastran r3 Training 133b Course NotesUploaded byAdamD
- Restart NastranUploaded byJacob Verghese
- Panel BucklingUploaded bysunil_vrv
- MSC Nastran 2012 Linear Static Analysis User’s GuideUploaded byMSC Nastran Beginner
- NASTRAN Nonlinear ElementsUploaded bysons01
- eBJSFMUploaded byapmapm
- LM2001-2Uploaded byTrexa Gyreue
- Concepts of Computational Finite Elements and Methods of Static and Dynamic Analyses in MSC.NASTRAN and LS/DYNAUploaded bysreejit77
- Finite Element Modelling Techniques in MSC NASTRAN and LS DYNAUploaded bysreejit77
- Msc Nastran 2014 Demo ProblemsUploaded byBruce Lee
- Patran Slide TutorialUploaded bymyasirz
- NASTRAN Glued ContactUploaded bysons01
- MSC.Nastran 2007 Implicit Nonlinear (SOL 600) User's GuideUploaded byDon
- Advanced MSC.patran ExercisesUploaded byAlex da Silva
- FEMCI - Random Vibration Specification Magnitude EquationsUploaded byrenatobellarosa
- mdnastran_r3_training_120_notes.pdfUploaded byColin Blood
- Optimization Applications Jack CastroUploaded byXavi Vergara
- Finite Element Modeling Techniques in MSC NASTRAN and LS DYNA[1]Uploaded byIndranil Bhattacharyya
- MSC Fastener Modeling for Joining Composite Parts 06-SpiritAero_BoshersUploaded bySergey Fedorinov
- Aircraft Structures I Chapter-1Uploaded byEjigayehu Lemma
- Nafems Dynamic Fea WebinarUploaded byRama Baruva
- Patran 2012 LaminateUploaded byanddev
- MPC Equations Rigid Elements-5!13!2010Uploaded bysfhaider1
- Patran 2010 PCL and CustomizationUploaded byDon
- Nonlinear Analysis Using MSC.nastranUploaded byLoc Vu Van
- Msc Patran Making a Composite ModelUploaded bydulaijan
- Patran 2010 Interface To MSC Nastran Preference Guide Volume 1: Structural AnalysisUploaded byDon
- Bruhn Errata by Bill GranUploaded byRob Littlewood
- MAR101_ExercisesUploaded bypektasomer

- Airbus Damage Tolerance Methodology for Composite StructureUploaded byBoby Alexander
- Research Development and Enhance Me Net of High Performance Polymer Matric Composite for Aerospace in ChinaUploaded byBoby Alexander
- Effective Dihedral.pdfUploaded byAngel Villalonga Morales
- 1999 MTS [Aerospatiale Aeronautique - Composite Stress Manual MTS00Uploaded bysofianekha204243
- Linear Static Analysis,NastranUploaded byaee361
- Basic Properties of Reference Crossply Carbon Fiber CompositeUploaded byBoby Alexander

- MAT500 Paper PhylogeneticsUploaded byScottMcRae
- Proclimb Float Belt Deflection AdjusterUploaded bycpcracing
- daily lesson logUploaded byreina_reyes_18
- Mitsubishi Servo SystemUploaded byGanesh
- GIS (Global Information System)Uploaded bygeetsahani
- Rlibrary-wmtsaUploaded byKim Samejima
- ec1145Uploaded byRajesh Subudhi
- Yale-YJLHook---YJC680.pdfUploaded byscofiel1
- Assess Whole SEM Model--Fit IndexUploaded bysunru24
- unitplanbio10Uploaded byapi-297068612
- English Grammar - Using Numbers, Making ListsUploaded byChiby Mirikitufu
- PaperUploaded bySwapnil Jain
- Ping e on Hole ExamplesUploaded bythermopolis3012
- Fibonacci Math PaperUploaded byDavid Ye
- SDH AlarmsUploaded byMaster22
- Anterior Point of ReferenceUploaded byDentist Here
- Bomba pedrollo e n 732Uploaded bysadema372
- REF54_tob_750443_ENhUploaded byUday Powar
- Catalog_apply · Jean-Romain_lidR WikiUploaded byariesugm
- Paper 1 - Stevens (Instrument Interview Q&A)Uploaded bySilo Miyan
- Abreviation ArbusUploaded byРоман Дяченко
- daikinskyairgar-22Uploaded byadehak
- GEOTECHNICAL_SOIL_INVESTIGATION_REPORT_O.pdfUploaded byFarroszy Safana Putra
- Sparse signal recovery in a transform domain.pdfUploaded bychokbing
- 21-50-51Uploaded byflitecomponents
- Bridge BalancingUploaded byettypasewang
- At Mega 88Uploaded byNguyen Canh
- Existence of GodUploaded byRenz Marion Cortes Caras
- MicroVision Plus (mMOTOR) Technical ManualUploaded bykukumarcic
- (Sensor de Color)Aplication Note_ VEML6040Uploaded bydaniel