You are on page 1of 38

# BY L.SWATHI 08951A21B1 B.

TEJASWI 08951A21B3

ABSTRACT
 Vortex shedding inside SRM is a well-known phenomenon,

which is a leading cause of pressure oscillations in the motors.  With the advent of high speed numerical techniques it has become possible to numerically simulate the flows of different regimes. CFD was one such tool which evolved as a consequence of these high speed numerical techniques. Vortex shedding phenomenon in SRM is predicted using this CFD tool.  In this project , in order to gain confidence in fluent solver , it has been validated by predicting the vortex shedding phenomenon in the flow past a circular cylinder and a flat plate to establish the methodology and then extended to SRM.

VORTEX
 A vortex is a spinning, often turbulent, flow of fluid. Any

spiral motion with closed streamlines is vortex flow. The motion of the fluid swirling rapidly around a center is called a vortex. The speed and rate of rotation of the fluid in a free (irrotational) vortex are greatest at the center, and decrease progressively with distance from the center, whereas the speed of a forced (rotational) vortex is zero at the center and increases proportional to the distance from the center. Both types of vortices exhibit a pressure minimum at the center, though the pressure minimum in a free vortex is much lower.

. real fluids exhibit viscosity and this dissipates energy slowly from the core of the vortex. However.  The core of every vortex can be considered to contain a vortex line.PROPERTIES OF VORTICES  The fluid pressure in a vortex is lowest in the center and rises progressively with distance from the center. and every particle in the vortex can be considered to be circulating around the vortex line  Two or more vortices that are approximately parallel and circulating in the same direction will merge to form a single vortex.  Vortices contain a lot of energy in the circular motion of the fluid. In an ideal fluid this energy can never be dissipated and the vortex would persist forever. The circulation of the merged vortex will equal the sum of the circulations of the constituent vortices.

VORTEX SHEDDING  Vortex shedding is caused when a fluid flows past a blunt object. The fluid flow past the object creates alternating low-pressure vortices on the downstream side of the object . the structure will begin to resonate and the structure's movement can become self-sustaining. .  If the frequency of vortex shedding matches the resonance frequency of the structure.

This phenomenon is of major importance in engineering design because the alternate formation and shedding of vortices also creates alternating forces. . Thus. A vortex is in the process of formation near the top of the cylinder surface. which occur more frequently as the velocity of the flow increases. the flow process in the wake of a cylinder or tube involves the formation and shedding of vortices alternately from one side and then the other. Below and to the right of the first vortex is another vortex which was formed and shed a short period before.

 The frequency at which vortex shedding takes place for a cylinder is related to the Strouhal number by the following equation The Strouhal number depends on the body shape and on the Reynolds number. and finally become chaotic and turbulent . . With increasing Reynolds number the flow becomes unsteady in a twodimensional periodic manner with regular vortex shedding. At even higher Reynolds number the flow becomes three-dimensional. At low Reynolds number the flow is steady and laminar.

DESIGN OF SRM .

begin to circulate.  Downwind of the obstruction are regions of lower pressure which causes the fluid which initially was deflected around the obstruction to get sucked into these regions. CFD is used to calculate the unsteady flow that arises from a fluid moving past an obstruction. .NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF VORTEX SHEDDING  To numerically simulate vortex shedding. and form vortices.

results for which are available for study even after the analysis is over. Momentum. . Generally a fluid flow problem is governed by different governing equations such as Mass. Energy.  In CFD we discretize these partial differential equations into algebraic equations which can be solved easily by using different software’s on computers. all these equations are PDE’s which are difficult to solve.  CFD is used especially for some reasons because CFD allows numerical simulation of fluid flows.

They are:  Finite Difference Method (FDM)  Finite Volume Method (FVM)  Finite Element Method (FEM) .Numerical Techniques In CFD For solving numerical equations we have different types of methods available.

k) is required). finite-difference methods are numerical methods for approximating the solutions to differential equations using finite difference equations to approximate derivatives. .  And then the governing equations are converted to algebraic equations (using Taylor’s series) which are solved iteratively until the solution converged.  In mathematics.FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD  In finite difference method the flow domain is discretized into a series of grid points (a structured mesh (i. j.

 "Finite volume" refers to the small volume surrounding each node point on a mesh.FINITE VOLUME METHOD  In FVM the flow domain is divided into finite number of control volumes using grid points then the integral form of equations are converted into algebraic equations and are solved until solution is converged. .

.FINITE ELEMENT METHOD  The finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for finding approximate solutions of partial differential equations (PDE) as well as integral equations.  The solution approach is based either on eliminating the differential equation completely. which are then numerically integrated using standard techniques such as Euler's method. or rendering the PDE into an approximating system of ordinary differential equations. Runge-Kutta. etc.

. The plate is placed at a distance of 60mm from the inlet and flow was computed over a length of 335mm after the plate in the axial direction.VORTEX SHEDDING IN FLOW PAST A FLAT PLATE The width of the flat plate was about 5mm and the lateral width of the plate was about 30mm.

 A flat plate is placed at 90° to the oncoming fluid stream to disrupt the flow and generate vortices of alternating rotation from the edges of the body.  To model flat plate using GAMBIT software and numerically simulate the flow past the flat plate using FLUENT software to obtain the frequency of pressure oscillations due to vortex shedding phenomenon .

The mesh details in the computational domain around the flat plate are as shown in fig. flat plate case and the circular cylinder case. The magnified view of mesh details near the geometry of the flat plate is shown in this figure.. The computational domain of the flat plate has 158594 cells.Quadrilateral mesh has been implemented for both the cases i. 318033 faces and 159435 nodes with mesh interval size of 1mm. .e.

.

Boundary conditions and physical values Velocity inlet along x-direction Velocity inlet along x-direction Pressure outlet normal to boundary Velocity inlet along x-direction .

VORTICITY CONTOURS .

.

VORTEX SHEDDING IN CIRCULAR CYLINDER The radius of the circular cylinder was 15mm. The cylinder is placed at a distance of 100mm from the inlet and flow was computed over a length of 350mm beyond the aft end of the cylinder in the axial direction .

498232 faces and 249688 nodes with mesh interval size of 1mm.3.Quadrilateral mesh has been implemented within the computational domain and around the cylinder. The magnified view of mesh details near the geometry of the circular cylinder is shown in the subsequent figure .Meshing is done using the GAMBIT 2. The mesh details in the computational domain around the circular cylinder are as shown in fig. The computational domain of the circular cylinder has 248544 cells.

Boundary conditions and physical values Velocity inlet along x-direction Velocity inlet along x-direction Pressure outlet.normal to boundary Velocity inlet along x-direction .

VORTICITY CONTOURS .

VORTEX SHEDDING IN SOLID ROCKET MOTOR  The geometry of SRM considered for analysis has three segments namely head-end . middle and nozzle-end or aft-end.  The solid rocket motor combustion chamber is in the form of a circular cylinder of 150mm radius with 50mm radius left hollow (perforation) for the passage of combustion products .

. Two inhibition regions (obstacle walls) are considered in the model –one at the head end segment joint (Joint-1) and the other at the nozzle end segment joint (Joint-2).• The other 100mm radius consists of the solid propellant grain.

COMPUTATIONAL DOMAIN  Vortex shedding does not occur initially and to simulate the phenomenon of vortex shedding flow has to be considered after certain amount of propellant has been burnt. simulating inlet due to solid propellant combustion . .  For this reason four different cases will be studied with different levels of propellant burnt and inlet conditions are imposed normally to side walls.

CASE 1: In this configuration 30mm of the propellant is burnt with inhibitors projecting out of the propellant surface without any erosion .

CASE 2:  In the second case the geometry of SRM after 30mm (in radial direction) of the propellant is burnt was considered for analysis with the assumption that the inhibitor at head end was eroding at the rate of 30% with respect to the propellant which appears to be 9mm. And the inhibitor at the nozzle end was eroding at the rate of 50% with respect to the propellant which appears to be around 15mm .

post-test inspection of the SRM revealed larger projection of left-out inhibition at the head end joint compared to the nozzle end joint. Accordingly. Inhibition projection at the head end joint was higher than the projection at the nozzle joint because of higher thickness of inhibition at the head end joint. Also as the expected velocity of gas at the head end region is always less as compared to the velocity at nozzle end joint region. . the erosion rate of head end joint inhibition was low.

.CASE 3:  In the third configuration the propellant was burnt up to 60mm and the inhibitor at the head end was eroded up to 18mm in the radial direction (30% with respect to propellant). The inhibitor at the nozzle end was eroded up to 30mm in the radial direction (50% with respect to propellant).

CASE 4:  In the fourth and the final case considered for numerical simulation of vortex shedding 90mm of the propellant was assumed to be burnt with inhibitor at the head end burnt up to 27mm along the diameter of the SRM cylinder ( 30% with respect to the propellant) and the inhibitor at the nozzle end burnt up to 45mm along the diameter of the motor cylinder (50% with respect to propellant). .

The configuration of burning motor after 60mm of its propellant burnt has 187404 cells with mesh interval size of 2mm. Quadrilateral mesh has been implemented for all the above mentioned four cases. .

mesh near obstacle (head end) mesh near obstacle (nozzle end) .

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS AND PHYSICAL VALUES Inhibitor at head end (no slip wall) Inhibitor at nozzle end (no slip wall) inlet inlet Nozzle section .

PRESSURE PLOT .

VELOCITY PLOT .