You are on page 1of 30

Cohort Studies

All studies involve some descriptive or analytic type of comparison of exposure and disease status. Analytical study design options include: observational or interventional (which one is based on the role of the investigator). There are three basic types of observational analytical study designs:
Cohort studies Case-control studies Cross-sectional studies

Specific epidemiological study designs can be used to reveal etiologic (causal) relationships

First, using observational analytical studies :

Determine whether there is an association between a factor or a characteristic and the development of disease

From these associations, derive appropriate inferences regarding a possible causal relationship

Analytical Studies
Control and experimental groups Randomized groups
data collected without bias

Dependent and independent factors

Cohort Studies
Group by common characteristics Start with a group of subjects who lack a positive history of the outcome of interest yet are at risk for it (cohort).
Think of going from cause to effect.

The exposure of interest is determined for each member of the cohort and the group is followed to document incidence in the exposed and non-exposed members.

When is a cohort study warranted?

When good evidence suggests an association of a disease with a certain exposure or exposures.

Cohort Effect
Changes and variation in the disease or health status of a study population as the study group moves through time. Generation effect

Types of Cohort Studies

Prospective (concurrent) Retrospective (historical) Restricted (restricted exposures)

Types of Cohort Studies

Prospective cohort characterized by determination of exposure levels (exposed vs. not exposed) at baseline (present) and followed for occurrence of disease in future
Groups move through time as they age

Retrospective - makes use of historical data to determine exposure level at some baseline in the past and then determine subsequent disease status in the present. Restricted - limited exposure, narrow behavior (military, long shore men)

Prospective Studies
Also called
longitudinal concurrent incidence studies

Looking into the future Example:

Framingham Study of coronary heart disease (CHD)

Design of a Cohort Experiment

The essential characteristic in the design of cohort studies is the comparison of outcome in an exposed group and a nonexposed group (or a group with a certain characteristic and
a group w/o that characteristic). A study population can be chosen by selecting groups for inclusion in the study on the basis of whether or not they were exposed

Selection of Cohort Groups

There are two basic ways to generate cohort groups.
Select a cohort (defined population) BEFORE any of its members become exposed or before the exposures are identified. Select a cohort on the basis of some factor (e.g., where they live) and take histories (e.g., blood tests) on the entire population to separate into exposed and non-exposed groups.

Regardless of which selection approach is used, we are comparing exposed and nonexposed persons.

Design of a Cohort Experiment

Design of a Prospective Cohort Experiment

Major problem with a prospective cohort design is that the cohort must be followed up for a long period of time.

Framingham Study
Designed to study the effect of multiple factors on coronary heart disease (CHD):
age hypertension elevated blood cholesterol tobacco smoking increased physical activity increase in body weight diabetes mellitus

Framingham Study Design

Framingham, Massachusetts population was 28,000 Study design called for a random sample of 6,500 Enrollment questionnaire form targeted age range 30-59 years No clinical evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Cohort re-examined every two years Problems: white, middle class

Hypothetical Cohort Study Approach

1. Examine people over their life times for contraction of diseases. In meantime, ask questions concerning diet, lifestyle,habits, work, etc. 2. Take blood and do lab tests (as many as possible). 3. Do same tests every year for a period of years.
Interventional aspect: If positive findings occur, they refer you to a specialist. By screening, they may have prolonged a life.

Valid, reliable surveys Critical number of subjects
the more, the better
Garbage in, garbage out

random selection random assignment

Rule out bias

For example, degree of accuracy with which subjects have been classified with respect to their exposure. For example, individuals who are sick may be more likely to give the kind of responses that they believe the investigator wants to hear

Data Gathering
Person - to - person Drop off questionnaire Mailed to people Telephone interview Newsletter or magazine

Potential Biases in Cohort Studies

Information bias Bias in estimation of the outcome Bias from non-response Bias from losses to follow-up Analytic bias

Your assignment:
Describe and differentiate between these types of biases.

Advantages of Prospective Cohort Studies

Captive groups Large sample sizes Certain diseases or risk factors targeted Can be used to prove cause-effect Assess magnitude of risk Baseline of rates Number and proportion of cases that can be prevented

Advantages of Prospective Studies (contd)

Completeness and accuracy Opportunity to avoid condition being studied Quality of data is high Considers seasonal and other variations over a long period Tracks effects of aging process

Disadvantages of Prospective Cohort Studies

Large study populations required
not easy to find subjects

Expensive Unpredictable variables Results not extrapolated to general population Study results are limited Time consuming/results are delayed Requires rigid design and conditions

Disadvantages of Prospective Studies (contd)

Subjects lost over time (dropouts) Costs are high Logistically demanding Maintaining quality, validity, accuracy and reliability can be a problem

Survivorship Studies
Survivorship is the number of persons out of a study population who would survive until a certain time interval has been reached Shows the chance that an event (such as death from cancer) will occur in successive intervals of time once a diagnosis has been made Analysis yields a cumulative probability of surviving the projected time period
For infectious diseases, we use case fatality rate to assess survival For chronic diseases, we use cohort life tables

(Cohort) Life Tables

Charts which summarize the patterns of survival and death in study groups of certain types of disease (chronic) Insurance companies study these charts very closely.

Survival curves and risk of death for males vs. females based on life tables in California for 1980.
Dip at beginning of life is due to infant mortality rate. As one reaches the later years of life, the survival curve goes down and the risk of death goes up.

Is the Association Causal?

To be continued