Page 9 of this declaration has the 12 places that Damon had said he was abused which were all completely ignored except for the one in Damon's top bunk on Feb. 23, 2003. Ignoring disclosures serves the purpose of covering up sexual abuse. Much of the rest is defending against the accusation of parental alienation. Note that Eric admitted that the incident had occurred, explaining what Damon had felt as the bedrail (which Judge Smyth rejected), so it is impossible that it was a result of Cindy alienating. This shows how the parental alienation theory is so ingrained in the system that it cannot even make sense, but is still considered.
Page 9 of this declaration has the 12 places that Damon had said he was abused which were all completely ignored except for the one in Damon's top bunk on Feb. 23, 2003. Ignoring disclosures serves the purpose of covering up sexual abuse. Much of the rest is defending against the accusation of parental alienation. Note that Eric admitted that the incident had occurred, explaining what Damon had felt as the bedrail (which Judge Smyth rejected), so it is impossible that it was a result of Cindy alienating. This shows how the parental alienation theory is so ingrained in the system that it cannot even make sense, but is still considered.
Page 9 of this declaration has the 12 places that Damon had said he was abused which were all completely ignored except for the one in Damon's top bunk on Feb. 23, 2003. Ignoring disclosures serves the purpose of covering up sexual abuse. Much of the rest is defending against the accusation of parental alienation. Note that Eric admitted that the incident had occurred, explaining what Damon had felt as the bedrail (which Judge Smyth rejected), so it is impossible that it was a result of Cindy alienating. This shows how the parental alienation theory is so ingrained in the system that it cannot even make sense, but is still considered.