Professional Documents
Culture Documents
this learning process as a four-phase cycle in which the learner: (1) does something concrete or has a specific experience which provides a basis for (2) the learners observation and reflection on the experiences and their own response to it. These observations are then (3) assimilated into a conceptual framework or related to other concepts in the learners past experience and knowledge from which implications for action can be derived; and (4) tested and applied in different situations.
1.EXPERIENCING: Concrete Experience/ immersing oneself in the doing of a task: Is the first stage in which individual, team or organization simply carries out the task assigned.The engaged person is usually not reflecting on the task this time but carrying it out with intention.
2.REFLECTION: REFLECTIVE OBSERVATION : Involves stepping back from task involvement and reviewing what has been done and experienced.
3.CONCEPTUALISATION: Abstract conceptualization: Involves interpreting the events that have been noticed and understanding the relationships among them. 4.PLANNING Enables taking the new understanding and translates it into predictions about what is likely to happen next or what actions should be taken to refine the way task is handled.
Experiencing
Processing Applying
Generalizing
provide your jobholders with fresh experiences and then facilitate these opportunities to make sure they complete the cycle and gain maximum benefit from the opportunity. A good trg mgr makes a habit of helping the job holder to systematically think about past events, analyzing what was learned from them and anticipating what they could do differently.
LEARNING STYLES:
Peter Honey and Alan Mumford have identified four
enjoy working with others but tend to dominate, doing too much themselves and hogging the limelight.
They tend to learn best from relatively short activities that involve immediate
involvement in active tasks. They dislike having to listen to long lectures of how to do things or follow instructions.
Training approach- problem solving, small gr. Discussions, peer feedback and
angles or viewpoints. They like to stand back and observe, collect data and think things through & analyse things carefully before coming to any conclusions.
They will prefer to take a back seat in the discussion and enjoy
listening to other before making their own points. They dislike being forced into limelight, being made to act as a leader or make a presentation.
rationally based theories. They like to analyse and synthesise and produce models and systems which combine disparate facts and fit them into rational schemes. They like to work through situations step by step. They tend to be perfectionists and reject anything intuitive that does not fit with their logical approach.
They are similar to reflectors but place a greater emphasis on a need to
place their learning in the context of a model or theory & feel uncomfortable if the activity is unstructured or presented in a disorganized way .or where they are not intellectually stretched.
experiences .They are interested in experimenting by applying new techniques. They are the type of people who return from courses and want to try out the new ideas straight away. They like to get on with things and act quickly and confidently and have a tendency to opt for a first expedient solution.
They need events where they are given the opportunity to try skills out
and receive feedback on their effectiveness but will be turned off by purely theoretical learning. Activities should apply skills
staff in the workplace, that we are aware of the differences between peoples learning styles. It is also important that we are able to recognize our preferred learning style as that will probably affect the way we develop our staff.
ACTIVIST
Strengths: Flexible and open-minded Happy to be exposed to new situations Optimistic about anything new and unlikely to resist change Weaknesses: Tendency to take immediate, obvious action without thinking Often takes unnecessary risks Tendency to do too much themselves and hog the limelight Rush into action without sufficient preparation Get bored with implementations/consolidation
REFLECTOR
Strengths: Careful Thorough and methodical Thoughtful Good at listening to others and assimilating information Rarely jumps to conclusions Weaknesses:
Tendency to hold back from direct participation Slow to make up their mind and reach decisions Tendency to be too cautious and not take enough risks Not assertive, they tend not to be too forthcoming and have little small talk
THEORIST
Strengths: Logical thinkers Rational and objective Good at asking probing questions Disciplined approach
Weaknesses:
Restricted in lateral thinking Low tolerance for uncertainty, disorder and ambiguity Intolerant of anything, subjective or intuitive Full of oughts, and musts
PRAGMATIST
Strengths: Keen to test things out in practice Practical, down-to-earth, realistic Business-like, gets straight to the point Technique oriented