Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
0Activity
P. 1
Vringo v Google - Ds SJ - P Opposition (2012!09!26)

Vringo v Google - Ds SJ - P Opposition (2012!09!26)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 28 |Likes:
Published by Dan Ravicher

More info:

Published by: Dan Ravicher on Oct 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/11/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
DSMDB-3100989
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIANORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________)I/P ENGINE, INC., ))Plaintiff, )v. ) Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512)AOL, INC. et al., ))Defendants. )___________________________________________)
I/P ENGINE, INC.’S OPPOSITION TODEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Dated: September 26, 2012 Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531)W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423)CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC150 West Main StreetNorfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 623-3000Facsimile: (757) 623-5735Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222)Frank C. Cimino, Jr.Kenneth W. BrothersCharles J. Monterio, Jr.Jonathan L. FalklerDICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 420-2200Facsimile: (202) 420-2201Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.
 
 iiIV.
 
I/P ENGINE HAS SUBSTANTIAL AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVE THATTHE ACCUSED SYSTEMS INFRINGE THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE ‘420AND ‘664 PATENTS ........................................................................................................13
 
A.
 
The Accused Systems Filter Advertisements Using Feedback Data in the Formof Clickthrough Data ...................................................................................................14
 
1.
 
.........
 
The asserted claims do not require “tracking and using historical click through rate for a specific advertisement” .................................................14
 
2.
 
.........
 
“Tracking and using historical click through rate” is not “central” toI/P Engine’s allegation; I/P Engine has shown that the relevant claimlimitations are met through Google’s extensive use of feedback datain disabling and promotion ........................................................................15
 
3.
 
.........
 
The evidence also shows Google uses historical clickthrough rate ...........16
 
B.
 
With Respect to the ‘420 Patent, The Accused Systems Filter Based on DataFrom Users With “Similar Interests or Needs” ...........................................................19
 
C.
 
With Respect to the ‘664 Patent, The Claims Do Not Require Filtering Based onData From Users With “Similar Interests or Needs” ..................................................21
 
D.
 
With Respect to the ‘664 Patent, There is a Genuine Issue of Material Fact as toWhether the Accused Systems Filter the “Combined Information” ...........................22
 
V.
 
GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT EXIST BECAUSE THE EVIDENCEDEMONSTRATES THAT INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘420 AND ‘664PATENTS EXISTS ...........................................................................................................22
 
VI.
 
THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AS TO WHETHERBOWMAN AND CULLISS ANTICIPATE ALL OF THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OFTHE ‘420 AND ‘664 PATENTS .......................................................................................25
 
A.
 
Bowman Does Not Anticipate the Asserted Claims of the ‘420 Patent ......................26
 
1.
 
.........
 
Bowman does not disclose “filtering the informons on the basis of applicable content profile data for relevance to the query” becauseBowman does not analyze content profile data .........................................26
 
2.
 
.........
 
Bowman also does not disclose “filtering each informon on the basisof applicable content profile data for relevance to the query” becauseBowman does not filter items ....................................................................28
 
3.
 
.........
 
Bowman does not disclose “the filter system combining pertainingfeedback data . . . with the content profile data in filtering eachinformon for relevance to the query” .........................................................29
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->